Recent content by Absolute zero

I will amend my statement to " I believe a person would be torn apart at the event horizon of a very large black hole and the larger the black hole, the larger the tidal forces at the same distance above the black hole," It should never been stated in the "been proven mode" . I had assumed the...

If you take the time to understand how the equation was derived, maybe the realization of the equation NASA used is indistinguishable from Newtonian. Also I am trying to show the equation was derived from RsC²/r² or is exact equivalent in Newton's theory of gravity. For Unclear Engineer ...

Do you want just equations or are you interested in a logical reasoning to why RsC²/r² should not be used at R=Rs? Manipulating the wrong equation at the start will most often result in an incorrect equation as a result. Here is a link to how the equation in question was derived. Note: It...

The error in problem three and four is the use of a newtonian equation near a black hole. Take orbital velocity for example, at R=1.5Rs, which answer would you consider correct V=1C or V~.58C Orbital velocity is connected to gravitational acceleration. A higher orbital velocity at a given...

Unfortunately, the tidal forces are larger the larger the black hole. The statement of tidal forces getting smaller the larger the black hole comes from using Newtonian equations where GR use is mandatory.

I can only tell you how I rectified the same " quibbles", First, try to forget about Newtonian gravity and replace it with spacetime warping. The spacetime at the event horizon is so warped that time doesn't exist (question is 'does spacetime exist without time'). Light cannot originate from...

This is an interesting link https://www.quantamagazine.org/massive-black-holes-shown-to-act-like-quantum-particles-20220329/ It has been known for awhile, black holes can be described with the same three parameters as a particle- mass, spin and charge. I wonder if this is the underlying...

But I have more emojis than I could ever use. 🙄😜🤯😵🤬😈👻🧠🏌️‍♀️🤘ect

I'm using android, had to get another keyboard app just to get pi and sqr. No sub script so apologize for that.

🥴 I don't know, substantially different R values covers a pretty big volume and possible situations. But for any value of R where Gravitational red shift would be significant, I can't imagine dark matter would be a significant factor. What we really don't know is if I know anything 🤯

None of the following is to be taken as gospel, how I would try to unravel this is to take measurements of the maximum red shift of object orbiting the black hole. Than convert it to a velocity. Do the same for the minimum red shift (or blue shift, depending on the situation). From this, orbital...

My guess is we are seeing some form of gravitational lensing, perhaps of a near by gas cloud? I think the chances of us seeing a face-on disk to be pretty small but not impossible. 🤔

I am trying to keep my posts relevant to the OP's question. Given an object in a stable close just outside the event horizon of a black hole. To a distant observer, will time dilation make the orbital period appear to be longer/slower than expected by purely Newtonian mechanics? Short answer...

Observer A and B are 2Rs from the center of the black hole. If the black hole has an Rs of 10km than 2Rs is 20km. Every black hole we observe from earth, we are the distant observer. Our clock is unaffected by objects we observe. Try to figure out what you would see in different situations in...

What an observer 'sees' depends on location, location and location. With a black hole, locations can be described in a way to make it clear what is being seen. For example: distant observer (D) is looking at a black hole from a position perpendicular to the orbital plane of observer B...