Recent content by Bowers3934

YES. I am ending here as I don't like your inference that I could be incapable of understanding your analysis. So, what if the sample rate was 12 seconds? The result produced and recorded 6EQUJ5 which is what was interesting.

The original article on the WOW signal said that the signal travelled 1800LY. That being the case it originated 1800LY ago. (I am not pedantic) The report said the sample rate was every 10 seconds. The values were not arbitrary, they represented signal strength. Who knows what other surprises...

https://phys.org/news/2024-12-interstellar-visitor-orbits-planets.html?utm_source=nwletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=daily-nwletter This article today may account for the AU distances being out of order. And Mercury and Venus missing. 6EQUJ5 numbers may relate to planetary positions 1800LY...

Thanks Billslugg, but 6EQUJ5 is what it is. Not perfect but this article today may account for the distances being out of order. And Mercury and Venus missing. 6EQUJ5 numbers may relate to planetary positions 1800LY ago...

In 1977, astronomers received a powerful, peculiar radio signal from the direction of the constellation Sagittarius. Its frequency was the same as neutral hydrogen, and astronomers had speculated that any ETIs attempting to communicate would naturally use this frequency. Now the...