Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Home
Featured
Forums
New posts
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Billboard
Trophies
Catastrophe's latest activity
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
C
Catastrophe
replied to the thread
Question
Infinity or not infinity that is the question.
.
Please note:
Feb 1, 2025
C
Catastrophe
reacted to
marcin's post
in the thread
Basic Error: The accelerating Universe conclusion - reason
with
Like
.
https://forums.space.com/threads/basic-error-the-accelerating-universe-conclusion-reason.67148/page-9#post-612899 Moreover, if there was...
Feb 1, 2025
C
Catastrophe
reacted to
marcin's post
in the thread
Basic Error: The accelerating Universe conclusion - reason
with
Like
.
@George² If the temperature is higher, the particles move faster, so they collide and interact more frequently. If there is a catalyst...
Feb 1, 2025
C
Catastrophe
reacted to
marcin's post
in the thread
Basic Error: The accelerating Universe conclusion - reason
with
Like
.
@Catastrophe Thx for the confirmation :) "If there is a catalyst, it must cause the reactants to interact more frequently, probably by...
Feb 1, 2025
C
Catastrophe
replied to the thread
Basic Error: The accelerating Universe conclusion - reason
.
As a Chemistry B.Sc., my explanation of catalysis is as follows Consider two reactants, A and B, which react to form AB directly only...
Feb 1, 2025
C
Catastrophe
replied to the thread
Basic Error: The accelerating Universe conclusion - reason
.
Just for clarification, Marcin " If there is a catalyst, it must cause the reactants to interact more frequently": correct. "a...
Feb 1, 2025
C
Catastrophe
replied to the thread
Argument by analogy
.
I am aware of the following, but I take serious issue with it...
Feb 1, 2025
C
Catastrophe
replied to the thread
Argument by analogy
.
This does not mean that the radiation is static. Photons do not stop moving because they are everywhere. They would not get everywhere...
Jan 31, 2025
C
Catastrophe
replied to the thread
Argument by analogy
.
Gibsense, we must, as always, watch the semantics. A background can be construed as static, but we are discussing cosmic microwave...
Jan 31, 2025
C
Catastrophe
replied to the thread
Argument by analogy
.
https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=to+radiate&sca_esv=bbddf6f6e47022e4&sxsrf=AHTn8zq7evhVB8uhZIZ_Sryy87ebwLC2MA%3A1738339588277&source=hp&...
Jan 31, 2025
C
Catastrophe
replied to the thread
Argument by analogy
.
Apologies for the repetition, but you seem to have missed this: Cat :)
Jan 31, 2025
C
Catastrophe
replied to the thread
Argument by analogy
.
Keep going . . . . . . you are getting there. The CMB radiation is not static. It is radiation. Cat :)
Jan 31, 2025
C
Catastrophe
replied to the thread
Argument by analogy
.
Do not confuse adjective and noun:
Jan 31, 2025
C
Catastrophe
replied to the thread
Argument by analogy
.
Do not confuse adjective and noun:
Jan 31, 2025
C
Catastrophe
reacted to
billslugg's post
in the thread
Argument by analogy
with
Like
.
CMBR is not static, it is composed of radio waves at several millimeters of wavelength coming at us from all directions at the speed of...
Jan 31, 2025
RESOURCES
Advertising
Cookies Policies
Privacy
Term & Conditions
FOLLOW
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
Top
Bottom