Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Home
Featured
Forums
New posts
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Billboard
Trophies
Catastrophe's latest activity
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
C
Catastrophe
replied to the thread
Need some help
.
OK, but Mercury is 0.000000166 ... and both M terms on RHS are ^2 so 0.0277755556 etc. squared 0.0277755556 x 10^-12 or about .03 in a...
Feb 10, 2025
C
Catastrophe
reacted to
Helio's post
in the thread
Need some help
with
Like
.
I think the answer is yes, but Einstein wasn't looking for a fairly accurate result, he wanted to nail it to as many decimals as...
Feb 10, 2025
C
Catastrophe
replied to the thread
Need some help
.
Helio, a Google ref gives: Post #4 quote includes: Does this mean that the mass of Mercury is not needed? I don't know. If mass of...
Feb 10, 2025
C
Catastrophe
replied to the thread
Need some help
.
Helio, it is Einstein's modified equation, not mine. I cannot see any reference by me to mass in my posts, which are mostly posts. Cat :)
Feb 10, 2025
C
Catastrophe
replied to the thread
Need some help
.
Was that by Jzz in #1? Cat :0
Feb 10, 2025
C
Catastrophe
replied to the thread
Need some help
.
That was the quotation referenced, in toto. Where does it suggest that mass is represented in the equation? Cat :)
Feb 10, 2025
C
Catastrophe
replied to the thread
Need some help
.
https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=Einstein+equation+for+precession+of+Mercury&sca_esv=9219933314578648&sxsrf=AHTn8zpRaPMQyHy06Ev1XB_MBhOC...
Feb 10, 2025
C
Catastrophe
replied to the thread
Need some help
.
Jzz Please pardon a slight coorrection - hardly centuries. Nearer one and a half: Cat :)
Feb 10, 2025
C
Catastrophe
reacted to
Harry Costas's post
in the thread
Basic Error: The accelerating Universe conclusion - reason
with
Like
.
Massive Cosmic Bubbles Discovered Above & Below the Milky Way View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tYxLRAY3neM
Feb 10, 2025
C
Catastrophe
reacted to
billslugg's post
in the thread
It's all in plain sight, maybe
with
Like
.
That is an accurate statement, but we are constantly told the Feds know, but they cover it up. The response only addresses one...
Feb 9, 2025
C
Catastrophe
reacted to
billslugg's post
in the thread
It's all in plain sight, maybe
with
Like
.
I cannot point out any flaws in the AI response. However, if it is a generative response it is giving us the "most popular" response. In...
Feb 9, 2025
C
Catastrophe
replied to the thread
It's all in plain sight, maybe
.
Yes, I see what you mean. Cat :)
Feb 9, 2025
C
Catastrophe
replied to the thread
It's all in plain sight, maybe
.
I don't know what credance you give to Google, but in answer to: it gives: I don't know how up to date this might be. Cat :)
Feb 9, 2025
C
Catastrophe
replied to the thread
Basic Error: The accelerating Universe conclusion - reason
.
What do you make of the Google then? Cat :)
Feb 9, 2025
C
Catastrophe
replied to the thread
Basic Error: The accelerating Universe conclusion - reason
.
I have no particular interest in this thread, other than to point out the variety of responses resulting from Google. Just trying to be...
Feb 9, 2025
RESOURCES
Advertising
Cookies Policies
Privacy
Term & Conditions
FOLLOW
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
Top
Bottom