Tracking, but the fixed point changes the fundamental complexity of the n-body problem as the coordinates are in relation to that point.
Am I over simplifying?
Not trying to be funny, but this suggests a 4-body problem with the 4th being a fixed location.
With all calculations in reference to the fixed location, this changes the nature of the original 3-body problem.
Am I interpreting correctly?
There will be multiple solar eclipses in the future. There are multiple sites available to show where/when they will occur.
For example:
https://www.timeanddate.com/eclipse/list-total-solar.html
https://science.nasa.gov/eclipses/future-eclipses/...
Dark side of the moon is a misnomer. It is "dark", as in unknown. Not dark as in relation to an absence of light.
Tidal locking keeps one side facing the Earth.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Far_side_of_the_Moon
I would assume your observation has been taken into account, as necessary.
I am not the biggest fan of SpaceX and its owner, but they do some decent engineering. Have to give them credit where credit is due.
Thank you for the suggestion. Sorry, but there is nothing of substance there.
The U does not mean extraterrestrial. I am more than familiar with all of those sensor platforms and how they work, including their capabilities and limitations.
I have no doubt you saw something. As to what it was is in question.
Eyewitness testimony is often misleading. That is an endless debate all in itself.
Riddle me this. With all the high-definition cameras covering the globe, why do none of them ever capture a clear image of these UAPs/UFOs...