Recent content by COLGeek

App? How are you accessing the site?

Might be worth your time to do so.

That isn't time travel. We have the same time reference. It is future only in so much as a difference from when you posted to when I responded.

Not sure this is new thinking. Others have certainly addressed this on a global scale, for many years.

The way previously worded implied something else. Looking forward...okay.

In reference to the previous post, that member started a new thread. The AI generated content was a summary of his paper. Not directly relevant to this thread. It was his "new thinking": https://forums.space.com/threads/structure-of-the-universe.70575/ As you can see there are many topics to...

Have you looked at any other the related threads on your topic? https://forums.space.com/search/449597/?q=dark+matter&o=relevance

So, what are your concise summary findings? Recommendations for future study? I am still struggling with the apparent (to the casual observer) the (coincidental) symmetry of the model and the associated assumptions. Just too clean and convenient.

Typically, you don't edit out previous forum posts. Just not how a forum operates..

Seems this, with an introduction, needs it own thread.

I draw your attention to this thread as well: https://forums.space.com/threads/my-ideas.69336/

I'll stand by to see what others think of these ponderings. In the meantime: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_gravity https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faster-than-light Visions?

Fighting who and why?

So, what is one new thing, with the supporting science/math to justify it, that does not draw on old knowledge (as you put it)? Just one completely new thing?

Maybe. Depends on your posture and how braced or not. The size of the round would also have tremendous bearing on the outcome (trying not to complicate all of this). The real question, other than curiosity, is why test at all? P.S. I have been shot. It is highly overrated. I do not recommend...