Recent content by Emil Enchev

Of course I know. :) The problem is that almost no one takes them seriously and that must change, because they are not baseless hypotheses. They are de facto the most logical hypotheses we can currently offer about the internal structure of celestial bodies.

I'm just adding, not deleting or changing the original post, except for a few mistakes I found (my English is not native though) but ok.

I'm not talking about little cavities here. I'm talking about a large number of them, which makes the interior of cosmic bodies almost hollow. I don't say anything about how the internal structure of these cavities is built exactly, although I can. In fact, this is the way to prove that the...

I once worked at the Academy of Sciences in Bulgaria. Believe me, in such places there is mainly only one thing to talk about: MONEY. These are places where many social parasites congregate, feeding on society's taxes. Universities are no different. P.s. By the way, it can easily be proven...

I am simply describing to you a scientific hypothesis that will soon become a theory when serious work begins to disprove or prove it. Unfortunately, NASA is a ossified bureaucratic organization that has little interest in moving science forward if there are no financial incentives associated...

That's exactly what I'm saying. Many of the celestial bodies that have a similar hollow skeletal structure in them often reaching a point where their own gravitational forces destroy them. Some of them don't even need a blow from an external body for this to happen.

The greatest threat to scientific progress is the reluctance of scientists to ask questions. Every civilization that has had any scientific achievements in the past has died out just as it stopped asking questions and began to believe that it understood the world around it almost completely. I...