Fire-Starter James's latest activity
-
They say it can go as high as geosynchronous. -
Fire-Starter James replied to the thread X 37B.What is the range of that thing? The Earth looks really far away there.
-
Being military and not NASA we can make some educated guesses and weigh what's more likely. Unmanned long term missions where the added...
-
Fire-Starter James replied to the thread Cosmic voids may explain the universe's acceleration without dark energy.I suppose we could write a library about why science has problems with the question "Why?". So not doing that here. What if the cosmic...
-
Fire-Starter James reacted to Unclear Engineer's post in the thread Einstein wins again! Quarks obey relativity laws, Large Hadron Collider finds with
Like.
How theorists think about "particles" is also part of the issue. We can all agree that when we try to measure subatomic "things", we... -
Fire-Starter James replied to the thread Cosmic voids may explain the universe's acceleration without dark energy.If we apply relativistic addition of velocities to the cosmic expansion, V(r)=Hr becomes V(r) = c * tanh(Hr/c). This explains the...
-
Fire-Starter James posted the thread Question We can't comment on the political bias in an article. in Forum Feedback & Competitions.But politically biased articles are protected, not rejected.
-
Fire-Starter James replied to the thread James Webb Space Telescope finds supermassive black holes that seem impossibly large.Wow. Amazingly not surprised.
-
Fire-Starter James replied to the thread Hubble tension is now in our cosmic backyard, sending cosmology into crisis.In our case, the mirage is caused by bad assumptions. #1 Hubble's Law is linear. That is, if object B is x times farther away than...
-
Fire-Starter James replied to the thread Unexpected cosmic clumping could disprove our best understanding of the universe.Why is clumping unexpected? Spill a pot of dry beans on the floor, and you'll see an example of random clumping.
-
Fire-Starter James reacted to Atlan0001's post in the thread Basic Error: The accelerating Universe conclusion - reason with Like.
Two infinities. Infinite occupancy on the one hand, infinite space available on the other hand. Schrodinger's cat. Good thinking! That...
-
Fire-Starter James replied to the thread Basic Error: The accelerating Universe conclusion - reason.I like the infinite hypersphere. It resembles math in general.
-
Fire-Starter James replied to the thread Basic Error: The accelerating Universe conclusion - reason.Guys, an infinite expanding universe doesn't need a fourth dimension to "expand into". Remember the hotel with an infinite number of...
-
Fire-Starter James replied to the thread Hubble tension is now in our cosmic backyard, sending cosmology into crisis.V(r) = c × tanh(Hr/c) relieves the "tension" in Hubble's Law. I don't know for sure why nobody will even try it out. (I suspect...
-
Fire-Starter James replied to the thread Hubble tension is now in our cosmic backyard, sending cosmology into crisis.Has anyone tried Lorentz contracting the redshift based measurements? Using V(r) = c × tanh(Hr/c) for Hubble's Law predicts this sort...
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram