Recent content by George²

Yes, sure 😁 One engine to accelerate between 1 and second space speed. Must take more time, and how to balance trajectory when work only one engine?

This vehicle is huge and heavy and can cause a lot of casualties on earth surface even when flying without a crew.

How much do they pay? All the ideology painted around the inspiration will not pay for my lost time and bills. If the stuffing is impressive, I'll be willing to live in this prison for the duration described.

Just make a new generation probe, with better and more number of scientific instruments, install a powerful enough reactor and generator and improved versions of the Hall effect engine, or VASIMR, and accelerate that ship to 10X the speed of Voyager 1. It will much faster and more meaningful...

Below 5% lose mass in all live period of Sun. From ignition to now.

No one who read this article now be alive in 2070. These bureaucracy timings are DOA.

The work of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory should be mainly that of the other end of the rocket, which ensures the delivery of the precious cargo, otherwise it would not be called that. As for how much the delivered freight costs. I think that the priority for profit is for private companies...

I wonder when this lab last built and tested a brand new large rocket engine, as they say, from scratch?

Because weight. Any gram more=feet lower flight. Martian atmosphere is very thin.

The telescope that will be able to detect extraterrestrial life, who knows, may already exist as a project. But certainly its construction and launch into space has not taken place yet.

Which one is for Starship v2?

I guess you can guess what happens to a closed space, even a high-tech one, when several people breathe, eat, exercise, bathe, excrete, conduct experiments, etc., in it for decades? About solar panels which adsorb decades solar and other cosmic radiation.

The differences in background power are not a particularly large number, but the granule sizes are too large and are themselves not the same apparent size. I do not think that the fluctuations that are assumed provide a sufficient explanation for these facts.

Have too big anisotropy and seen universe in microwaves is granulated in last maps.

Yes, this looks like it was set up on purpose. Nothing else works, well it's relic radiation, which may be of a different origin than the big bang-friendly interpretation.