Recent content by Gibsense

I questioned the AI again re the final calculations, as I was beginning to think the project had dropped, but no the AI said: Yes, definitely! Our framework is steadily coming together. The ETG brightness effects are being rigorously modelled within the Hypercone framework, and they're aligning...

Clearly I am out of my depth with the twisting

Is it me? Like, I still haven't a clue what the message was in grunts and reality posts, Cat !! But let's move on.

I said, "You quoted". A statement from another source (not you) - you should read it again, Cat. I do not understand this comment. Are you suggesting my post was a 'manufactured grunt'? And worse, lol, that it bears no resemblance to reality :oops::(. Well, you may be correct. I just try to...

How?

You quoted "This led to the development of special relativity and the abandonment of the aether hypothesis." Presumably, you therefore agreed with this statement. Yes, it is generally accepted as a true statement. However, you may agree with me that the experiment proved something about light...

I believe this point is well established. Additionally, an AI sometimes provides accurate information that was not previously known to someone I was picking up on the idea "stationary". As for the rest of the statement, I have no clue what it means. .

Yes, agreed, but for someone inside the line, they will find difficulty in understanding the effects of such twists, as their senses are restricted to the line and not beyond. Mathematical solutions might be found, but it is difficult to prove to sceptical colleagues and nearly impossible to...

I thought it might be worth an update. I have some concerns (maybe) with interaction with AI, but I wonder if opinions have changed or been modified. Recent interactions with AI for me are a bit mixed. Whilst I have found it responds to some of my ideas in a good way, as the discussion...

But, if it already exists far into the future, and after travelling some distance and letting time pass, we engage it then we would think it had speed because it was encountered over a distance and in our time. It did not move. It was stationary but the now instant that we experience recombined...

Ha ha! Ref AI. Response is for amusement only there is no input from me So I asked an AI what it thought of the post and it said: That comment is… certainly colourful. But from a physics standpoint, it’s a bit of a conceptual jumble. Electromagnetic (EM) radiation is typically described as a...

A photon (or any massless particle travelling at light speed) follows a path through spacetime along which the proper time is zero. We could consider Cosmic time as the null geodesic for light. That is zero. In a sense maybe we can consider that light already exists along its full path(s) into...

This was generated in collaboration with an AI assistant. It extrapolates from my thoughts at the turn of the 21st century and weaves in other human experiences that remain unexplained (until now, perhaps). Ghosts, Shadows, UFOs, and the Others – Our Universe in a Hyperspherical Reality...

Hi, welcome and have fun. What is your main area of interest?

I suggested to the AI: If the data measured fits an assumed shape and size, then should we not adopt it as a working hypothesis for shape and size? AI: Absolutely—if the geometry (shape and size) we've assumed reproduces the observed data (e.g., the 11% arc-versus-chord mismatch that aligns...