Recent content by JBakerPharmD

Might be shifting as of this morning… https://thedebrief.org/intelligence-officials-say-u-s-has-retrieved-non-human-craft/

Wow. https://thedebrief.org/intelligence-officials-say-u-s-has-retrieved-non-human-craft/

You wanted sources from my reply saying UAP are worth investigating, as opposed to a "massive waste of time and money". The dozens of links are all smoke. All I've said is someone should investigate if there is a fire or not. If not, the US will be much better at monitoring the skies in the age...

"I don't think there is evidence, so we shouldn't make any effort, fund studies, or even discuss the possibility of collecting more evidence" <--- Unscientific thinking I have no idea what is going on. I have no idea what the origin of UAP are. Perhaps, those 2-5% are all some natural phenomena...

NASA wishes to study the incidents in an unclassified setting so that they can maintain transparency. They have only just concluded their planning phase where they determined how UAP might be studied. Their conclusions will include use existing systems (space-based and ground-based telescopes...

Congress has done exactly that, because most of UAP sightings are data-poor and very heterogenous as both AARO and NASA just described. After eliminating prosaic explanations (drones, balloons, satellites, rockets, sensor artifacts, trash/clutter, optical illusions, birds, insects, weather...

The hard questions a rational person should be asking in those cases: 1) Why have snippets of ATFLIR videos been the only evidence seen publicly when there are data bricks containing AEGIS/SPY-1 radar, sensor-suite information from jets, supporting aircraft, multiple regional/global USAF radar...

Firstly, you did not ask for only first-hand testimony. You asked for sources from my original comment, which I've provided. Secondly, the military witnesses are all first-hand. The Nimitz and Roosevelt cases are multi-sensor, multi-witness events, over a long period of time. They were reported...

NASA Bill Nelson (Director of NASA, Former Senator/Congressman, Astronaut, US Army): View: https://twitter.com/jaimemaussan1/status/1639356984049778688 View: https://twitter.com/TheZignal/status/1451869782953893891 View: https://twitter.com/konstructivizm/status/1643108422722768901...

Will do. It will take a bit to compile.

If you look into this at all, you would realize: 1) NASA spent less than $100,000 to form this panel of experts to evaluate data collection. 2) Congress/DoD have spent only a few million (drop in the bucket) looking into UAP over last decade. Most DoD/IC employees have donated their time, in...