Recent content by jim_robison

It will be interesting to see what happens when OBJECT A meets OBJECTS D and E. Could OBJECT A be a predator and OBJECTS D and E targets?

Imagine an early human gazing into the sky at night as she nurses her child. She wonders what it would be like to visit the moon and the stars. She realizes she is not capable of the journey, but she feels confident that a child of hers will someday make the journey for her. Flash forward to...

And what if that "distant observer" was the entangled partner photon?

While we are making our super lens, let’ save some of that negative gravity for a no-fuel-required spacecraft. We put a glob of negative gravity on the tail and some positive gravity on the nose, and we can travel throughout the universe with zero fuel consumption.

I think the light from individual stars (or other objects) would get "mixed-up" in the gutter and the output at the focus would just be a bunch of light. That would make a poor magnification device, but it may have other uses.

The sun is not creating global warming. Man-made changes are causing the earth to retain more of the suns energy, thus warming the planet.

I believe it was Heraclitus who said “The only constant is constant change.” The other quote I like, but don't know the source, is "Constant change is here to stay."

I agree with you, 400%, more or less.

I have always thought "black hole" was an unfortunate choice of names. A hole is usually considered empty or sparsely populated, yet the center of a black hole is the most dense object we know of. I nominate "light sucker" as the new name.