Recent content by maglioned

  1. M

    Discussion on: Theory of the Four-Dimensional Electromagnetic Universe

    I think it’s useful to post this discussion: Temporal waves are explored in the second part of my book. In my theory, there is no inflation, and the expansion speed of the 4D universe occurs along the temporal dimension always at the speed of c "expressed in privileged quantities." This is...
  2. M

    Discussion on: Theory of the Four-Dimensional Electromagnetic Universe

    In my theory, the 4D universe is not a space plus an imaginary time dimension as in Minkowski spacetime, but rather four real spatial dimensions. The fourth dimension, according to the restricted holographic principle of my theory, appears to us—living in the 3D part of the 4D universe—as time...
  3. M

    Discussion on: Theory of the Four-Dimensional Electromagnetic Universe

    I'm glad you find my theory interesting! Your feedback is welcome anytime, whether you decide to comment or just reflect on it.
  4. M

    Discussion on: Theory of the Four-Dimensional Electromagnetic Universe

    I would like to discuss with you my latest work, which led to the publication of my book: Theory of the Four-Dimensional Electromagnetic Universe. (If you’re interested in buying my book, feel free to message me directly. Thanks, everyone!) Below the abstract and table of contents: This...
  5. M

    James Webb Space Telescope adds to the confusing drama of Hubble tension

    It seems to me that, based on the paper's abstract, the Hubble tension seems to be resolved. In fact, the results from the Chicago Carnegie Hubble Program (CCHP) to measure the Hubble constant (Ho) using data from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) are statistically consistent with the Ho...
  6. M

    Redefining Electrons

    Thank you for your response. While I appreciate your perspective, I believe the core scientific issues I raised remain unaddressed. Accurate use of terminology and understanding of established principles are crucial in any scientific discussion. I encourage further review and consideration of...
  7. M

    Redefining Electrons

    I read the introduction of your book, I noticed some significant, non-negligible errors: 1. Confusion between electric charge and energy : You confused charge (Coulomb) with energy, which should be expressed in Joules or electronvolts. 2. Incorrect energy unit: The unit of energy for an...
  8. M

    Theory of Four Dimensional Electromagnetic Universe.

    Sorry, but your arguments are just chatter without any 'scientific-mathematical theory behind them.' Fortunately, you prefaced it by saying "it's my opinion", and I don't comment on your opinion precisely because it is yours. As I mentioned before, the universe (whatever its definition, which is...
  9. M

    Theory of Four Dimensional Electromagnetic Universe.

    Understand what you want to understand. Good evening
  10. M

    Theory of Four Dimensional Electromagnetic Universe.

    I didn't write that the universe was born from itself, but from the quantum vacuum that has always existed. On the other hand, this is not my hypothesis, but that of many others. You can find this concept explained in simple terms around; for example on...
  11. M

    Theory of Four Dimensional Electromagnetic Universe.

    Sorry, but where is contradiction? The definition of universe is everywhere. The following one comes from the most important Italian encyclopedia: Universe In astronomy, the set of celestial bodies (planets, stars, galaxies, dust and diffuse gas) that surrounds the Earth. The astronomical study...
  12. M

    The Discovery of Photon Mass Supports the Theory of Photons Having a Gravitational Effect

    Since the photon is energy, according to the theory of relativity, it is enough to generate gravity. Mass does not necessarily have to exist to generate gravity.
  13. M

    Theory of Four Dimensional Electromagnetic Universe.

    ok, but if you read my publications you will see that I am talking exactly about a 4D hyperspherical universe, where we live in the 3D part whose volume is 2(pi^2)(R^3) (3D hypersurface) and not 4 /3 pi R^3.