Recent content by promytius

Well that's just horrible, but no surprise given the deteriorating state of things everywhere; chaos only creates more chaos - we could argue that - oh, wait... My takeaway is that this group led me to explore AI chat and that helped a lot in finding , sorting, and organizing information. Thanks...

Our concept of 'universe' is human-limited. All that we perceive as "universe" is a minuscule, tiny tiny local event in the infinity of the true Universe. There is no end, there is no boundary, there is no loop-back there is only a flat infinite universe. I know this. How? It is what it is. It...

You don't know that any of what you said is true, as you pointed out, it's a thought experiment; you're just listing your beliefs in 1D, you have no access to proofs. Your premises are just as speculative as mine - so to claim some sort of correctness over the use of one word - believe - is...

(No AI involved) Or, one could also by reversing the two, say: Indeed, our universe may not be a closed hypersphere—space curving not only into itself but also through time, forming a higher-order dimensional loop. It may well be an infinite 3D expanse with an arrow of time. Such a topology...

AI seems to have created a rabbit hole for you, and you went down it.

It seems illogical to declare something 'elegant' that is just as theoretical as its alternative. No proof for a closed loop, and no proof for infinity. Your argument falls apart.

I'll vote when anyone from any multiple world gets back to us.

"NOTHING" My definition may be different from yours and different from others. Google's response is a non-human, logic-based summation of available data, including Wikipedia, NASA, Redbook, Playboy, and the Goat Farmer's Annual. There is no incentive to pursue such a conversation, when it starts...

"There is zero sign of a major cosmological paradigm shift coming out of academia. Any new ideas remain very much fringe, and I think the reason is that none of them are sufficiently radical -- they just don't involve a large enough departure from the existing dominant paradigm." does this add...

Are there measurements to show your results? Say 1 microgram of an element is transformed into energy, in joules. Can that be accurately measured? If so, how can you obtain the same results by moving the speed of light to the denominator?

Schrödinger's cat now has a flashlight; is it on?

I cannot answer how long entanglement lasts, and I have long wondered why no one ever mentions how heat interacts with entangled particles; I've not seen a detailed list of the conditions for entanglement, nor the maximum distance, nor the details of creating them - I certainly don't read enough...

This may be a new definition for scientific trolling. Accusing Einstein of "Lying" is simple hyperbole in order to cause others to react - I sure did - this thread should close soon because there's nothing here. And learn some manners!

Yes neutrinos are important and have always been found throughout the universe in a very active way. They're small, but they are also made of more than one thing, so they are not the smallest bit by any means.

Have you tried proper manners when interacting with AI? Your aggressive and insulting comments added nothing to the discussion. Instead of engaging in a discussion of the factors, of which you offered nothing other than the same quote over and over; sometimes I had to check who's text it was...