Recent content by Rangerer

Only one reason: Marketing.

Newtonians have no use for time travel; that's the lair of the quantum physicists alone.

Only some people require physical proof for aliens to be accepted as real; others are persuaded by the voluminous reports and records. Briefly; they're real, they've been visiting Earth for at least 250 millenniums, and they're here now, in fact, there's also good evidence of alien...

"You can't go back in time, nor forward" Well, in the macro-world that is correct I think; in the quantum world, very tiny, local things happen, maybe influenced by forces/energies/dimensions we cannot perceive, in a very tiny space. Within those tiniest of spaces, it seems entirely possible...

There certainly is no concrete future; "future" is a human concept to help them deal with existing in the moment; it is as old as Homo Sapiens, I believe. We believe we "remember" the past, when the data is clear, we don't. A concept is not a reality, nor anything of substance nor energy, nor...

One cannot change the non-existent.

"Future" is speculative at best, and does not, will not ever exist. It's a human nickname that translates into something like "but what if I ..." - there is no reality to "future," it does not exist.

Well, I see the balloon analogy as false. The balloon expands from its original edge, the opening, and pressure is exerted directly into the balloon, creating differing currents; if you inflate it from it's center, please specify the universe in which that can happen. Also ,a balloon is not a...

I am naturally skeptical as well; in my late 70's now, I'm totally convinced these phenomena are real. It's simple logic. Nothing human could withstand the forces demonstrated by these vessels; nor do we possess a silent, exaustless, means of instant acceleration and vector changes, not to...

Evidence for my assertion? You have none for yours, neither do I. How many Laws of the universe are there; so far, not many, especially compared to the many theories that exist and appear seemingly every day, trying to further explain the universe. By my logic, 'a nothing' cannot exist in the...

what's the house inside of? What's the Earth inside of? What's the galaxy inside of? So, what is the universe inside of - nothing; it has no outside, no end, no container. You stopped your logic thread at the threshold!

Two thoughts from a non-physicist: Size of the Universe - there cannot be an ultimate container for the Universe, so there cannot be a measurement of the radius, therefore it is infinite and has no "container-like" qualities. Black holes - I think I am correct in assuming that black holes are...

I remember an article referencing a galaxy not far from ours that was formed only a few hundred million years after the Big Bang. Doesn't that imply that we are very close to the center of the universe?