Recent content by sgtnos

Every argument against why it should not work is based on, well it did not work that way in the beginning. The laws are different now or they changed. Do you see a problem with changing laws and rules? That breaks everything they have done because they should never get the same answer due to...

This points out some of my arguments. I am guessing you may not know the laws of thermodynamics. More evidence against big bang, as it is actually closer to being debunked than the rest. https://www.discovermagazine.com/the-sciences/could-the-big-bang-be-wrong...

An alternate approach is to measure quasar nuclear-narrow line emission, which is free from microlensing and present in virtually all quasar lenses. In this paper, we double the number of systems which can be used for gravitational lensing analyses by presenting measurements of narrow-line...

You are not correct and do not seem to understand observable light and how images work for objects that far away. They do not actually get images, as much as they get data points and try to determine what they mean. They have to make up the explanation for what they see. No landmark discovery of...

You believe in infinity, you brought up black holes. They require infinite gravity, which is not possible. Also, with gravitational collapse, which supposedly forms black holes, causes gases to turn into a star. The process described requires gravity to work upon itself to form heat as the...

He did not do extensive work on the bomb and he did not know enough to keep him around as they continued the project. I can only guess that he was accessible, similar to what Tesla was doing when he would send ideas into the future by talking to the press and hoping it will inspire someone. Look...

Einstein had a different theory until Hubble "Proved" him wrong through his observations. Again, we are in a cloud of dust that Hubble did not know about when he made his measurements. The equipment he used to do this is less accurate than what people have at home and this effectively ended the...

The problem for them is all of the research and I worked in the Signal Corp in the Army and I understand how radio/radar/light waves travel. Also, because as an MP I had to learn some of that again for running radar/lidar. Cops are not supposed to run radar in the rain or snow for a reason.

https://www.space.com/33892-cosmic-microwave-background.html Same, last one I will be contacting and no mention of anything other than not everything is moving at the same rate, well a dust cloud would cause that to appear to be the case. It is based on space acting as a perfect vacuum, I don't...

No mention of the space cloud in any of them or Hubble's own work. If they messed this up, they need to go.

https://www.space.com/hubble-constant-measurement-universe-expansion-mystery.html This article is the next one I will contact.

Also I did check all of the other studies linked in the article and I am going to email them after I get a response. I am adding this just to timestamp my plan and ideas. Nobody is going to say they came up with this suddenly, because I have proof.

I emailed the Prof from the article saying they had different results, I intend on posting the reply.

Look, the measurements are all bad because of https://www.sciencefocus.com/space/is-space-a-perfect-vacuum/ they ignore the fact that space is not a perfect vacuum and https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn24153-solar-system-caught-in-an-interstellar-tempest/ we are in a dust cloud. They are...

We need new physics because they cannot get the same answers while we are traveling through a cloud of gas. I don't even know what to say.