Recent content by skynr13

I think that would only add to their angst for confusing everyone.

I guess I was a bit confused on this whole memory thing, I don't know why they don't call it a 'pre-state' then instead of memory, it makes it seem like the BH is a brain!

I really think MPI scientists should have something better to do than make up a bunch of theoretical nonsense such as this ! ! !

But I'm wondering what kind of info. BH's have, besides, 'we're a bunch of atoms and we're squishing so tight!'.

Ok, but in my & Darwin's theory, when the Earth was 4-4.5 billion year ago, it was spinning 6-8 times faster. Making it only necessary to spin at 4-3x faster for the Moon to reach orbit. The moon made of mostly sand and radioisotopes and the gravity on both probably reduced do to its and Earths...

Ok, you are the first person I've talked to about this. But I really believe this theory and I won't go easily, I hope you have some physics background. What I've read about the early Earth says that it was spinning at 6 times the speed it is now or more when the Moon appeared. Would that be...

I wonder why very few people actually believe in Darwin's idea of the Moon's creation? to me it is the most realistic!

You have my vote. 30 attonewtons is necessary to attract how massive a particle? Assuming all things are relevant, we suppose.

Yea, except I edit stuff out too, if I sent a lander all the way to the moon and forgot to flip the switch to turn it on!!!

In reference to the SDC that is mounted on the leading face of the New Horizons spacecraft. How do we know that the particles striking it are made of dust and not some particles of ice from the Oort cloud?

In the comment in this article, 'a new moon race, a competition between the U.S. and China for the right to establish precedents and norms of behavior in the high frontier. ' There is no competition going on here, as all precedents and norms of behavior will apply to everyone on the Moon...

Well Adoni Yannop, it's pretty hard to argue with all that! But I disagree with the idea that things need to be hot to create gravity. Most all planets in the Universe are cold, lifeless places, yet they have gravity, no real heat necessary. Also I don't actually believe the hype that there is...

It isn't the spin so much that's dragging space/time, it's the gravity of the space body.

Yes I feel the same way. If only he didn't have that attitude of que sera sera about everything he's into. (Twitter, self-driving cars, his massive Tesla paycheck, etc.)

If they observe the orbit of plasma at 60% of C (SoL) I realize that gives them some idea of how fast it's spinning. But since the accretion disk is some distance from Sag A, then Sag A must be spinning even faster. How can a BH spin at a speed so close to the speed of light? Could there be...