Latest activity Postings Featured content About Trophies
-
-
Sstanwaterman replied to the thread Goodbye infinity and all that infinite singularity and infinite density descriptions.It's perfectly simple really, it was a huge mass but not zero size. Why would it be? Dividing by zero, just gives infinity of course and...
-
Sstanwaterman replied to the thread Polaris defined..Both Ursa Minor and Ursa Major are still there, glowing in the night, and will be long after we are all dust!
-
Sstanwaterman reacted to ChrisA's post in the thread Why does classical physics gravity formulas/measurements do not work at a quantum level, what’s missing? with
Like.
My opinion is that classical physics is just a shortcut. It is the result of summing trillions of quantum effects. Other examples of... -
Sstanwaterman reacted to promytius's post in the thread Why does classical physics gravity formulas/measurements do not work at a quantum level, what’s missing? with Like.
You're too young to remember when cars were started with a crank; you had to crank it, over and over, in order to start it, so you did...
-
Sstanwaterman replied to the thread A possible insight into the Big Bang.It's all just piffle, there is not much pint in trying to understand something which has no meaning!
-
Sstanwaterman replied to the thread Scientists find highest energy cosmic ray electrons ever seen.Rest-mass is constant, the mass at rest! The apparent mass increases with speed not acceleration although if you are accelerated you do...
-
Sstanwaterman replied to the thread Question Speed of light.You can't travel at the speed of light and spaceships don't have headlights! However, hypothetically, if you were travelling just under...
-
Sstanwaterman replied to the thread What is the wavelength of a 1 Hz photon ? The particle-wave non-sense.What a load of rubbish again! Einstein was very probably the greatest scientist of the 20th century and all the other top scientists of...
-
Sstanwaterman reacted to billslugg's post in the thread Gravity does not cause any light bending, NASA scientist claims. But what does ? with Like.
We can look at dispersion of radio waves. We find a pure source of radio waves, could be a chemical maser in a cloud somewhere. We know...
-
Sstanwaterman reacted to billslugg's post in the thread Gravity does not cause any light bending, NASA scientist claims. But what does ? with Like.
Space is a high vacuum. No refraction going on there. The interstellar medium contains about 10^6 hydrogen molecules per cubic meter. A...
-
Sstanwaterman reacted to billslugg's post in the thread Gravity does not cause any light bending, NASA scientist claims. But what does ? with Like.
The only reason we can't measure the bending of starlight outside the corona is the bending is too small to measure. We see it all over...
-
Sstanwaterman replied to the thread NASA confuses gravitational redshift with refractional redshift.More endless twaddle! There is zero doubt among all physicists that NASA have got it right. It's lucky that house-builders don't get...
-
Sstanwaterman replied to the thread The absurdity of space-time curvature and geodesics.More and more and more twaddle!
-
Sstanwaterman reacted to Helio's post in the thread Basic Error: The accelerating Universe conclusion - reason with Like.
Yes. This was, IIRC, an element within de Sitter's modeling in 1917. The view was that the wavelengths would become longer due to...
-
Sstanwaterman replied to the thread The absurdity of space-time curvature and geodesics.This is just twaddle I'm afraid, the writer really needs to learn some physics!
-
-
Loading…
-
Loading…
-
Loading…
-
Loading…
Forum statistics
TRENDING THREADS
-
Basic Error: The accelerating Universe conclusion - reason- Started by Gibsense
- Replies: 188
-
-
-
Definition of Universe requires clarification, to enable discussion
- Started by Catastrophe
- Replies: 36
-
Just a couple of questions please about just how far back we can model.- Started by Starstruck
- Replies: 12
-
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram