stanwaterman's latest activity
-
Sstanwaterman replied to the thread A possible insight into the Big Bang.It's all just piffle, there is not much pint in trying to understand something which has no meaning!
-
Sstanwaterman replied to the thread Scientists find highest energy cosmic ray electrons ever seen.Rest-mass is constant, the mass at rest! The apparent mass increases with speed not acceleration although if you are accelerated you do...
-
Sstanwaterman replied to the thread Question Speed of light.You can't travel at the speed of light and spaceships don't have headlights! However, hypothetically, if you were travelling just under...
-
Sstanwaterman replied to the thread What is the wavelength of a 1 Hz photon ? The particle-wave non-sense.What a load of rubbish again! Einstein was very probably the greatest scientist of the 20th century and all the other top scientists of...
-
Sstanwaterman reacted to billslugg's post in the thread Gravity does not cause any light bending, NASA scientist claims. But what does ? with
Like.
We can look at dispersion of radio waves. We find a pure source of radio waves, could be a chemical maser in a cloud somewhere. We know... -
Sstanwaterman reacted to billslugg's post in the thread Gravity does not cause any light bending, NASA scientist claims. But what does ? with Like.
Space is a high vacuum. No refraction going on there. The interstellar medium contains about 10^6 hydrogen molecules per cubic meter. A...
-
Sstanwaterman reacted to billslugg's post in the thread Gravity does not cause any light bending, NASA scientist claims. But what does ? with Like.
The only reason we can't measure the bending of starlight outside the corona is the bending is too small to measure. We see it all over...
-
Sstanwaterman replied to the thread NASA confuses gravitational redshift with refractional redshift.More endless twaddle! There is zero doubt among all physicists that NASA have got it right. It's lucky that house-builders don't get...
-
Sstanwaterman replied to the thread The absurdity of space-time curvature and geodesics.More and more and more twaddle!
-
Sstanwaterman reacted to Helio's post in the thread Basic Error: The accelerating Universe conclusion - reason with Like.
Yes. This was, IIRC, an element within de Sitter's modeling in 1917. The view was that the wavelengths would become longer due to...
-
Sstanwaterman replied to the thread The absurdity of space-time curvature and geodesics.This is just twaddle I'm afraid, the writer really needs to learn some physics!
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram