Recent content by Turtle

  1. T

    UFOs worth investigating despite lack of 'real evidence,' former astronaut Scott Kelly says

    And you would have me provide physical evidence for this event to a government and authorities that have already destroyed their own credibility? When the people represented by the person I talked to want to be so known they will present their own evidence. I have a strong feeling that if they...
  2. T

    UFOs worth investigating despite lack of 'real evidence,' former astronaut Scott Kelly says

    Thanks Dave, As I mentioned, once one has met an alien face to face all the conjecture about being alone fades away or actually is blown away. Cobwebs disappear. Being relegated isn't so bad. After all, who needs who? As far as physical evidence, I had hand prints from one or two of them on...
  3. T

    UFOs worth investigating despite lack of 'real evidence,' former astronaut Scott Kelly says

    If you want to see a massive waste of time and money try to buy a used car.:confused_old:
  4. T

    UFOs worth investigating despite lack of 'real evidence,' former astronaut Scott Kelly says

    Something in this makes me laugh. I wonder what would happen if you and some others had had an experience such as I have had and still ended up with NO verifiable evidence to share with others? All this experience and nothing but dirt in the old pockets to take to the bank. Anyway, I was...
  5. T

    UFOs will remain mysterious without better data, NASA study team says

    The human mind is easily outraged. It is normally a terrible observer. It insists that its world exists within its own understandable boundary s. Not all events that impinge upon the physical world are physical nor have physical substance. They are events none the less. Not saying what...
  6. T

    UFOs will remain mysterious without better data, NASA study team says

    Please remember that I am not asking for any validation. Don't need it. As for NASA they might benefit from what I said but doubt they would ever read this. If they knew me they would believe me, but they don't know me and there are too many people that just plain lie. So they would be stuck...
  7. T

    UFOs will remain mysterious without better data, NASA study team says

    Bill, that is most likely the case. I can't argue about what may be called definitive proof. I do however know my own experience. That experience does not require any authority of any kind to validate it, especially from a government that lies to us as an operating parameter. No matter...
  8. T

    UFOs will remain mysterious without better data, NASA study team says

    If our government keeps the data so very secret maybe NASA should try a few other governments. Make contact. Other governments might be more willing to share. It is truly a shame that these fine people are receiving harassment for even studying the UAP subject. The article didn't mention the...
  9. T

    Entropy Means...Nothing!

    Well OK, But one should admit that the concept of entropy works well for engineering designs. I have designed some engines and wouldn't throw out the use of entropy. A T-S chart is a very good tool to have around. That said, I found what I believe is a limit to a classical concept of...
  10. T

    Why does SETI require this?

    So if one entangled photon out in space went through an unknown polarization process along its way without being observed it would maintain it's entangled state???? Once its state is observed (by some intelligence?) it loses its entangled state???
  11. T

    Pentagon releases its long-awaited 2022 UFO report

    I thought those military photographs were classified because they didn't want to admit that their cameras were so darn bad. How far away from the UAP were they? Anyway they were UAPs, we all know what a UFO is don't we? I've seen a UAP. It was way up high in the sky, it was coming right...
  12. T

    Why does SETI require this?

    But if they go through the filter it's because they haven't touched anything. That's because they were polarized the same way as the filter. Like going through a window. The rest of the photons smacked into the filter and were done for. How would they lose their entanglement? And I was...
  13. T

    Why does SETI require this?

    Well, can't we filter the home stream of photons for vertical polarization and send the cross polarized ones to the receiver and maintain the entanglement? If that were the case then another equally far away receiver could get our vertically polarized ones and they could communicate.
  14. T

    Why does SETI require this?

    OK, so now take a stream of trillions of entangled photons and send the outgoing ones out there to a receiver person. Next run the home stream through a polarizer and eliminate all the photons which are not say vertical. Those vertical photons then are unscathed by a detector. Untouched...
  15. T

    Why does SETI require this?

    I probably missed out on something here. I thought that if an entangled photon was found to be polarized vertically than its corresponding photon would be polarized horizontally. If it just hit the wall then what?