Recent content by Viktor Vasylyev

  1. V

    DART result and deflection of dangerous NEAs

    Dear colleague, if you do not know which methods of disclosure regarding scientific or technological results are evidence-based and credible (see my first post), do not agree with the experimentally established internal structure of NEAs (which excludes the use of any "pulse" approaches and...
  2. V

    DART result and deflection of dangerous NEAs

    I agree with your assessment of the gravitractor method efficiency . For the sake of brevity, I have given only one of its shortcomings, which has manifested itself recently, thanks to an understanding of the NEAs internal structure. To illustrate it, one can do (or imagine) the following simple...
  3. V

    DART result and deflection of dangerous NEAs

    It seems that avoiding collisions with the help of an extremely risky and contrary to international law nuclear explosion, alas, remains popular ... However, more optimal options are needed, in addition to sci-fi (for example, laser with the PRACTICAL impossibility of cooling powerful lasers in...
  4. V

    DART result and deflection of dangerous NEAs

    Dear colleague, unfortunately your statements “you argue that the rubble pile is not monolithic, then seem to argue as if it is, except for the ejecta. And you argue that the heavy ejecta does not rotate with the main body" are wrong. First, looseness (rubble pile) for NEAs is currently well...
  5. V

    DART result and deflection of dangerous NEAs

    These are additional details needed to understand. Please see this video RIGHT after 50th second ignoring the relatively far-flung and expanding "cloud". It shows that Dimorphos`s image has approximately doubled in size, which leads to an estimate of the photometric center displacement by...
  6. V

    DART result and deflection of dangerous NEAs

    Regarding the «DART mission having been declared a resounding success». Briefings, emotional interviews, impressive photos, PR-type publications - all this can be important for discussions and conclusions in politics, but not in science. Before the appearance of publications in peer-reviewed...