Recent content by Wolfern

Exactly! Not observable, not testable, not provable. Requires faith based on claims by scientists who are not able to use scientific methods to prove it.

You do not have any specific examples because there are none. As interesting as the math, involving gravity, velocity, mass, etc, might be, they have no relation to the evolution of life.

I'm sorry, but in my seventy years, I have never seen anyone point to a beneficial mutation. Please send me some documentation, or at least refer to them in this thread, that points to even one beneficial mutation. Thanks.

Nor has anyone ever seen a bacterium evolve into even the most simple of ameba. Evolution not only does not happen, it cannot happen. Consider the eye. In order for the lens to have evolved, it would have needed the retina for it to focus light on to. In order for the retina to have evolved, it...

Confidence equals faith. If I swing out over a precipice on a rope, it is only because I have the confidence/faith in the rope. If I step out of a plane with a parachute, it is only because I have confidence/faith in that parachute. You can have confidence in evolution, but you cannot observe or...

Humans remain human. There have been no documented changes of any species into other species. Humans have been endowed with the ability to be aware of self and to reason, developing thoughts, ideas, ambitions, and tools. In all that, they remain the same humans. Macro evolution is a myth. Micro...

You are right, this is perhaps not the forum for that debate, although I would love to have it with you. Suffice it to say that having faith in nothing exploding and turning not only into everything, but also into life, without actually being able to test or observe it, requires a great deal of...

The evidence shows only that life exists, not how it got here. Your faith in evolution is remarkable. It is a greater faith than many religious people have in God. It is that faith that makes evolution a religion.

If I listed all my sources, it would in itself be a book. Simple solution, check out Institute for Creation Research, Answers in Genesis, Etc. There are many scientists who write about and clarify what actual beginning looks like.

You are correct. There obviously had to have been a "cause", because statistically it is "impossible." Read "Evolution, a Theory in Crisis, but Michael Denton, a secular scientist who does not believe in God, but articulates the reasons evolution could not have happened.

Statistical analysis is not arrogant. Facts are facts. The chances of "evolution" of life is absurdly impossible. No matter how much one might believe it could happen, it is totally, statistically, impossible. We cannot ignore the science or math.

The short answer is, the statistically impossible chain of events that would be required to form life, even if you used every atom in the universe and had them recombine a trillion times a second, would require trillions of years to accidentally come up with the right combination for life. Using...

The simple answer is "NO". Evolution would require a statistically impossible chain of events. Nothing comes from nothing, unless there is a cause. Having nothing explode and turn hydrogen into life is impossible.

The inane drivel of someone using connect the dots as a means of proving intelligent life in the Milky Way is very disappointing. If there were intelligent life and they had the advanced technology which allowed them to move stars into a pattern, which would be prohibitively expensive and time...

It is clear that "suspecting" something happened, for which there is no evidence, but would explain, if it might have happened that way, how something we believe to have been the case, could have explained something we have no way of knowing or testing.............. This supposition and make...