Recent content by Xinhang Shen

It seems the last attempt to cheat the public for grant because quantum mechanics itself is totally wrong and the wave-particle duality is the result of a particle disturbing its surrounding aether, nothing to do with probability wave. Two years later, nobody will believe it any longer and there...

Disproving special relativity In Newtonian mechanics, we have Galilean Transformation between two inertial reference frames: X' = X - vT Y' = Y Z' = Z T' = T where v is the speed of the origin of the inertial reference frame represented by Galilean spacetime (X', Y', Z', T') relative to the...

Yes, it is true that gravity can slow down atomic clocks and can also make pendulum clocks tick faster, but it just influences specific physical processes just like the influences of temperature which can be corrected through calibration. It can not make time go faster or slower. All so-called...

Regarding the twin paradox in special relativity, the traveling twin's biological age is the product of relativistic time and his aging rate. The aging rate of the traveling twin is getting faster than the aging rate of the twin on the earth similar to the frequency of the moving clock shown...

Special relativity only tells us that the relativistic time t' of the moving frame observed in the stationary frame (relative to the observer) becomes shorter than the relativistic time t of the stationary frame: t' = t/γ Nothing else. It is a wrong interpretation that the clock on the...

The article you mentioned and the quotes you presented seem irrelevant to my question: Are all the atomic clocks on the GPS satellites and the clocks on the ground synchronized relative to the reference frame of each satellite and the ground frame after correction? According to SR, the speed...

Many thanks, Dr. Joe for answering so many questions here! It has been a while since my last question. How is it going? Have you got someone to confirm how the clocks on the GPS satellites and clocks on the ground are synchronized? >DrJoePesce said: >Thanks for the follow-up XinhangShen. My...

Dr. Joe, The reason that I repeatedly raise the issue about Einstein's relativity here is that I am confident that Einstein's relativity is wrong but the mainstream physicists and journal editors refuse to accept the fact and are rejecting all anti-relativity papers unconditionally without...

Many thanks, Dr. Joe for your very detail explanation. Do your words above confirm that the clocks on the GPS satellites are synchronized relative to all reference frames (the reference frames of all satellites and the ground frame) to show the same absolute time, which means clock time is...

Many thanks, Dr. Joe. May I repost my question from the previous week? >DrJoePesce said: >Thanks for the follow-up XinhangShen. My understanding (maybe incorrect) is that the >GPS satellites' clocks are synchronized. I don't think they are synchronized with the >ground clocks. I'll see if I can...

Thanks, Dr. Joe. I think that all the clocks including the ground clocks should be synchronized so that they all have the same time that can be used to determine the position. Some people argue that the clock on a satellite and the clock on the ground are synchronized only relative to the...

Many thanks for your quick reply. But Special relativity tells us that simultaneous events observed in one inertial reference frame must not be simultaneous observed in another inertial reference frame, i.e., clocks synchronized relative to the ground frame must not be synchronized relative to...

Hi Dr. Joe, It's wonderful that you are back to answer our questions. Here is my question: The article for "GPS" on the wikipedia has a sentence: "The satellites carry very stable atomic clocks that are synchronized with one another and with ground clocks." Does that mean these clocks are...

Many thanks, Dr. Dave Bobolts for your quick response! Regarding atomic clocks on the GPS satellites, I think your interpretation is the current official interpretation but is a misinterpretation. As I proved theoretically in my question, the effect of special relativity can never be shown on...

Dear Dr. David Boboltz, It seems a great opportunity for people in astrophysics to get a direct channel of communication with top decision makers. As an expert with Ph. D. in Astrophysics and a government decision maker in funding astrophysics programs, you will definitely be interested in...