John Gribbin in his book "Six Impossibilities" made the following conclusions about quantum physics:
The First. The world doesn't exist if you don't look at it.
The Second. The movement of the particles is controlled by an invisible wave, but the particles do not affect the wave.
The third. Everything that could happen, even in principle, happens in one of the many parallel realities.
Fourth. Everything that could have happened, at least in principle, has already happened, and we have noticed only part of it.
Fifth. Everything affects everything else instantly, as if space didn't exist.
Sixth. The future influences the past.
In fact, this is a squeeze from the modern theory of the quantum world. Do you think such a theory can be a science, or is it closer to fiction or even a fairy tale?
The First. The world doesn't exist if you don't look at it.
The Second. The movement of the particles is controlled by an invisible wave, but the particles do not affect the wave.
The third. Everything that could happen, even in principle, happens in one of the many parallel realities.
Fourth. Everything that could have happened, at least in principle, has already happened, and we have noticed only part of it.
Fifth. Everything affects everything else instantly, as if space didn't exist.
Sixth. The future influences the past.
In fact, this is a squeeze from the modern theory of the quantum world. Do you think such a theory can be a science, or is it closer to fiction or even a fairy tale?