Maybe I am just tired. Whatever I want to fix this idea.
I imagine the universe as a sphere (ok boring but..) the drawn representative circle cannot be smooth. It must be roughened by loads of gravity wells drawn as delves in the surface. On the opposing side of the circle (universe) would be the same roughness caused by gravity wells. All this graphic is of course dimension reduced.
The gravity wells on the opposite side would be viewed as humps if it were possible to see them and of course with time running in the opposite direction they would be (relatively) antimatter.
So, what if anti-matter existed locally; how would we draw it in my simplistic way? Instead of wells, we would draw them as humps. To anyone who has understood my idea of radial distance as a description of time this would mean that the mass in gravity wells and the mass in gravity humps were separated by time. Anhilliation avoided? Would we, could we, equate antimatter with Dark Matter in some way? Probably nonsense but does the idea have any merit?
I imagine the universe as a sphere (ok boring but..) the drawn representative circle cannot be smooth. It must be roughened by loads of gravity wells drawn as delves in the surface. On the opposing side of the circle (universe) would be the same roughness caused by gravity wells. All this graphic is of course dimension reduced.
The gravity wells on the opposite side would be viewed as humps if it were possible to see them and of course with time running in the opposite direction they would be (relatively) antimatter.
So, what if anti-matter existed locally; how would we draw it in my simplistic way? Instead of wells, we would draw them as humps. To anyone who has understood my idea of radial distance as a description of time this would mean that the mass in gravity wells and the mass in gravity humps were separated by time. Anhilliation avoided? Would we, could we, equate antimatter with Dark Matter in some way? Probably nonsense but does the idea have any merit?