Space.com article reported, "The whole reason these exomoons showed up in the transit method is that they are huge mini-Neptune-size bodies that could have diameters between 1.6 times to 4 times that of Earth. If they're there, they're huge. Kipping thinks that's part of what could make them just too unusual to be widely accepted as the first exomoon discoveries. "I think there is a lot of suspicion about Kepler-1625 b I and Kepler-1708 b I because they're both weird. They're both like these mini-Neptune size moons, right? And everyone is asking, 'Who ordered that? How does the universe make such bizarre stuff?'" he said. "And then this controversy doesn't help at all. They're too damaged now."
I do not see them listed now at the exoplanet sites I use.
This encyclopaedia provides latest detections and data announced by professional astronomers about exoplanetary systems. It is about objets lighter than 60 Jupiter masses, which are orbiting stars/brown dwarf or are free floating. It provides also a database about planets in binary systems, and...
exoplanet.eu
exoplanetarchive.ipac.caltech.edu
Perhaps an old fashioned sword duel is needed here to settle the debate
Tycho Brahe style
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram