Artemis 1's Orion spacecraft captures stunning photos of the moon during its closest approach

Dec 4, 2019
3
1
1,515
Visit site
Those pictures are not "stunning". Those are 1960's archive pictures oversaturated black and white photographs. Very poor quality for 2022 technology and a real disappointment for such an expensive mission.
 
Oct 30, 2021
41
26
4,560
Visit site
While not "stunning", they're not 1960's archive photos (though they look that way!) As the article states they're test shots from the navigational camera.

Direct from the article:

Orion has been busy capturing images of Earth and the moon at different phases and distances to test the effectiveness of its optical navigation camera under different lighting conditions as a way to aid spacecraft orientation during future crewed missions, according to the image descriptions on NASA's Flickr account(opens in new tab).

NASA had said early on that the high resolution photos and 4K video they are capturing (they have a ton of cameras on Orion) are far too much data to stream back through the Deep Space Network are instead being captured and stored on-board Orion to be released upon its return. Let's hope for a successful landing and retrieval or most of that will be lost.

It is a bit disappointing for a mission designed to not only justify the insane cost of this mostly disposed of rocket, but to inspire a new generation to pursue STEAM careers, that for whatever reason the massively talented public relations folks behind JWST, Hubble and all the planetary missions are not on-board with Artemis and the human spaceflight program.

Instead we're subjected to statements like, "gee, the rocket was so powerful it nearly destroyed the $2Billion mobile launcher that will take a year or more and another $1Billion at least to repair!". Or a really cool "where is Orion" app that isn't tracking in real-time but what the planned trajectory was before launch.

For all the money spent and planned to still be spent it feels like such a missed opportunity to sell this program to the public.

Spoiled we are from SpaceX's candid, professional launch commentary and gorgeous on-rocket camera views from launch to landing and payload deployment. As a space enthusiast I eat that up like gummie bears!
 
I am still trying to figure out the relationship with SpaceX Starship.

Since Starship is contracted by NASA to take Artemis astronauts from lunar orbit to lunar surface, what is the point of having the NASA SLS take those astronauts to lunar orbit in the first place? Why not just put them on the SpaceX Starship as it goes to lunar orbit where it is planned to wait for the Artemis capsule?

I do think that the Starship development schedule sounds optimistic. So, I can understand that NASA wants a "plan B" option for getting their astronauts onto the surface of the Moon. But, NASA is just starting the process to get a second contractor working on that. And, that contractor might well need to hire SpaceX to get their lander up there. Could a Falcon Heavy do it, if no boosters were recovered?
 

TRENDING THREADS