<p>Hello,</p><p>I've read almost all of Bova's work, including some recent stuff that appeared in Analog, which he used to edit. In fact, year to year I read as much of one author as possible. Last year was my Bova Year.</p><p>I think Bova is very good at extrapolating current trends, technology, and science and then explaining these as background or as some key to a story. His writing is entertaining and it keeps a good pace. It is also memorable. Trouble is, most people I speak with about his stuff have never been able to think of it as "great." And that bothers me because he is a good, solid, and well-established writer. If not great, he certainly knows how to take an audience exploring.</p><p>I think that what I enjoy is he seems to write as an engineer writes, albeit a divorced engineer who was at one point a poor city-kid!<img src="http://sitelife.space.com/ver1.0/content/scripts/tinymce/plugins/emotions/images/smiley-wink.gif" border="0" alt="Wink" title="Wink" />Sometimes the interpersonal relations between men and women are a tad too strained. And I don't think rich people really talk the way he has some of his megalomaniacal billionaires talk. That being said Bova ventures into areas not explored by other authors. </p><p>I thought his story about manned exploration of Venus was well done. His exiles saga was fun for the time it was written, and the Kinsman saga extrapolated a lot of 1960s stuff right into the SDI of the 80's and what might have been if the two were combined. I also enjoyed the Orion saga, and some of that seemed to come out of some short stories he wrote in the 60s. Indeed, Orion had a touch of Stapledon, Carter, and even Wells and I think "Orion" really would give Benford's "Core" saga a run for its money.</p><p>When I want a solid, steady, and enjoyable read I read Bova. I would recommend most things by him.</p><p>****1/2</p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> </div>