M
mikeemmert
Guest
While the car was getting lubed this morning, I went into the public library. It was a different branch than the one I escaped the cold in during the homeless horror.<br /><br />But they did have the print version of Scientific American for January of 2006. They had a nice article on brown dwarfs by Subhanjoy Mohanty and Ray Jayawardhana, so I photocopied it. It's not online, to my knowlege, so the inevitable typos quoting it are my bad. I also changed the order of some paragraphs because I felt it was clearer that way, my bad.<font color="yellow"><br /><br />"What is a planet? It seems such a simple question, but the answer keeps getting more and more confused. On the one hand, the line between planets and lesser bodies is notoriously hazy...Less well known, though, is the muddle at the upper end of the planetary scale: the blurring of the divide between planets and stars...<br /><br />These are the brown dwarfs. They span a mass range of 12 to 75 Jupiters: too light to aattain the high central temperatures required to fuse ordinary hydrogen nuclei but heavy enough to fuse deuterium, a less common isotope of hydrogen. Newly formed brown dwarfs shine like feeble stars but quickly exhaust their deuterium supply...<br /><br />Do they form basically like planets or basically like stars? According to the most popular model, a gas giant planet stars with the gradual agglomeation of dusto debris inot larger and larger bodies. Once such an object reaches a few Earth masses in size, it undergoes ruanway growth...the disk gas also dissipates by either accreting onto the central star or getting blown<br /> out of the system altogether. So the amount of gas available to build a gas giant planet diminishes with time, limiting the heaviest object that can arise to a mass of about 10 to 15 Jupiters...<br /><br />...stars form within so-called molecular clouds; vast agglomerations of cold gas and dust, each with enough material to form scores of suns. Within such a cloud some reg</font>