Can we solve the black hole information paradox with 'photon spheres'?

The article concludes, "Despite the change, the differences in the photon spheres between classical relativity and the predictions of these exotic models are still too small to be seen with the Event Horizon Telescope. But that telescope's incredible image will not be the last picture we take of a black hole. Future attempts to study M87* and other supermassive black holes will deliver higher-resolution images. If we can resolve the photon ring, studying its width and brightness will give us clues as to the nature of the event horizon and, ultimately, how to resolve the black hole information paradox."

Indeed, follow the Galileo example at Jupiter with the Galilean moons observed, observed again and again :)
 
Apr 23, 2020
12
1
4,510
Visit site
Why doesn't an outside observer measure the mass of a black hole as being located at the event horizon (instead of the center) due to time dilation. I imagine light passing close to a black hole would bend differently depending on whether the mass is at the center versus at the event horizon, and that could be measured.

Also, since gravity travels at the speed of light, and light inside the event horizon can't escape, and spacetime itself is warped to the point where it rotates around the black hole, then how can gravity (or gravitational waves or energy) escape the black hole if it originates at the center? That wouldn't be an issue if black hole mass were instead located at the event horizon.
 
Jul 23, 2021
1
0
10
Visit site
Theories that attempt to resolve the so-called black hole information paradox predict that black holes are much more complicated than general relativity suggests.

Can we solve the black hole information paradox with 'photon spheres'? : Read more
I have a hypothesis and would like you to think about it and it's a kind of physics beyond the physics we know. The last few years lots of new observations have been made what Einstein and Schwarzschild and Hawking didn't have the chance to see. We shouldn't be trapped in theories that make us stop thinking but we have to use logic to understand what we see and don't wait for new math or physics as logic could lead to them. The issue is that the matter that enters the black holes just become invisible but not destroyed. There are two different possibilities: first one is that the speed of the entering matter accelerates till it reaches a speed faster than the speed of light in a way that the image or information becomes too fast to be transferred by light or invisible. The second possibility is that the temperature inside the black hole is lower than the absolute zero, in this case the atoms get stalled and can't be detected as there is no energy created or both possibilities together. The mainstream science may not agree but if we want to look beyond we must use the most powerful tool and that's the logic.
 

Latest posts