Collisions could increase chance of 'God of Destruction' asteroid Apophis hitting Earth

Sep 16, 2024
2
0
10
Visit site
At best, this article is clickbait. At its worst, this article is bad journalism.

Writing a headline like that when you know well that NASA has already stated there is 0% chance of Apophis hitting Earth for the next 100 years. You all should be ashamed of yourselves...

Stop sensationalizing Apophis just for clicks & ad revenue. Greed on its finest display.
 
Sep 16, 2024
2
0
10
Visit site
Eh, NASA still said 0%. I think I'll trust NASA over some random stranger on the internet who has an opinion.

"Now, the results from a new radar observation campaign combined with precise orbit analysis have helped astronomers conclude that there is no risk of Apophis impacting our planet for at least a century."

 
I’ve always been an oddball. Even if I had a catalog with all the rocks and moving positions for the last hundred years, I would not give any rock a 0% chance of collision with earth.

And I don’t believe in probability. But I do believe in unknown happenstance.

The center of our MW could have super nova-ed 23 k years ago and we not know it. Not even the shine has got here. One of out neighbors could have done so years ago and might hit us until tomorrow.

The only warning is arrival. Just a shine shock could plummet us with our rocks.
 
I look at this article as a good example of thinking about the incompleteness of most of our probability modeling.

Clearly, just like we hope to be able to defend our planet by striking an asteroid with a spacecraft impactor to deflect it enough, early enough, for it to be made to miss Earth, there is an opposite side to the same physical concept - a natural object collision with an asteroid could make a miss turn into a hit on Earth.

Looking at it as carefully as we know how, including what sized objects could move Apophis' path 19,000 miles towards Earth by 2029, how many such objects are in the area of its orbit, and what the probability is for such an impact to move the orbit to the "wrong" path instead of a "better" path, seems like good scientific thinking to me. It helps us gauge the reliability of the projected path and prediction that we are "safe" (from this one) for 100 years or more.
 
From what we know, we think only our home brew rocks have impacted. Who’s to know if external system debris could enter. Or might have in the past. And what kind of warning we might get.

What would it be like to pass thru a galactic debris field.

If 100,000(probably many more) foreign rocks entered our system and would assume at high velocity, would we even have time to calculate probability? What could we really do but watch.
 
I note this report I read yesterday. Earth may have had a ring system 466 million years ago, https://phys.org/news/2024-09-earth-million-years.html, ref - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012821X24004230?via=ihub

"In a discovery that challenges our understanding of Earth's ancient history, researchers have found evidence suggesting that Earth may have had a ring system that formed around 466 million years ago, at the beginning of a period of unusually intense meteorite bombardment known as the Ordovician impact spike."

My note. As more and more astronomical studies take place involving impacts in the solar system, Charles Darwin warm little pond in 1871 needs much modification now for violent catastrophism, including long ages for evolution to take place, more violence, more mass extinction, and death. Looks like violent impacts and catastrophism must be extended well beyond 4 billion years ago now. Apophis fits into this paradigm and extending catastrophism into the present, perhaps :)
 
Sep 19, 2024
1
0
10
Visit site
At best, this article is clickbait. At its worst, this article is bad journalism.

Writing a headline like that when you know well that NASA has already stated there is 0% chance of Apophis hitting Earth for the next 100 years. You all should be ashamed of yourselves...

Stop sensationalizing Apophis just for clicks & ad revenue. Greed on its finest display.
And you expect NASA would tell the truth? LOL Super brilliant!
 
NASA is not the only source of information. There are many universities and other groups who would communicate information like this. They would keep NASA on the up and up. That’s one reason to doubt the Apollo nay-sayers. If Apollo was faked, the Soviet Union and others would have jumped right on it with proof. NASA and related sites are pretty good sources as they are a lot of information in one location.
 

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts