Debris from Chinese rocket crash found in Indonesia and Malaysia

Catastrophe

"Science begets knowledge, opinion ignorance.
The 25-ton (22.5 metric tons) core stage of a Long March 5B rocket crashed back to Earth uncontrolled on Saturday (July 30), slamming into our atmosphere over the Indian Ocean. Much of the booster burned up as it fell, but a significant portion of it — about 20% to 40% by weight, experts have estimated(opens in new tab) — survived the fiery journey.

It is very quiet so far about deaths/damage. Let us hope for the best.

Cat :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: sam85geo
Aug 2, 2022
17
1
15
Visit site
Someone has to win the lottery. It also depends on how many lottery entries you make.

Also, did you hear about something unexpected hitting the JWST?

Cat :)

No, in this case it is not true that "someone has to win the lottery". Earth has been bombarded by meteor debris for centuries and only one person has been hit. And many trillions of person-days of existence on earth is a LOT of lottery entries. And the "unexpected" Webb hit was just expected to be more rare that it was (expected yearly or more); maybe a fluke, maybe the models are off a bit.

Mod Edit
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Isn't the "rule". .... Given enough time and attempts what's probable can and usually does happen". A really fast moving piece of sand just put a rather large, unfixable hole in the JWST. So much for saving the taxpayers' money via low cost bidders, or "Nay! don't worry it's very low probability. P.S.: I buy a weekly lotto ticket....... just in case Lady Luck winks.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Catastrophe
I'm not sure how those probabilities of hitting a person are calculated. This is not one piece coming down. As illustrated in the videos, it breaks apart, and a substantial fraction of the total mass reaches the ground as multiple pieces. It is more like being down-range from a shotgun blast than at rifle shot.

And, hitting a building in an urban area might still result in harm to inhabitants, even if not directly impacted by the space junk itself.

My suspicion is that this has been underestimated by a bit, both because it is easiest to do that, and because the message to support is "don't worry".

Still, it is a low probability risk.
 
I think the larger parts of the debris are tracked pretty carefully, not to mention the active satellite paths. So, a launch can be calculated to miss (or be missed by) the things we track.

On the other hand, once a launch vehicle is well clear of the atmosphere (where debris density is extremely low because it can't stay there for even one orbit), the small pieces of junk that are not tracked, or even trackable, might do damage to something like a heat shield surface, which might cause a catastrophic failure during reentry.

This problem is only going to get worse as more and more counties launch their own space vehicles, often on small budgets and with limited capabilities for things like engine restarts while in orbit (where there is no "bottom" in a tank and ignition may be an issue).

And any sort of a war that involves disabling adversaries' satellites could jack this risk into the unacceptable range for manned flights.

Some international rules might help, but we have all seen how effective the U.N. isn't at making countries behave ethically.
 

Latest posts