Dextre questions

Status
Not open for further replies.
W

willpittenger

Guest
<p>1. Why does Dextre have to be assembled rather than shipped up in one piece like CanadaArm2 was?</p><p>2. Does someone have images showing the pre-assembly layout (the various pieces)?&nbsp;</p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <hr style="margin-top:0.5em;margin-bottom:0.5em" />Will Pittenger<hr style="margin-top:0.5em;margin-bottom:0.5em" />Add this user box to your Wikipedia User Page to show your support for the SDC forums: <div style="margin-left:1em">{{User:Will Pittenger/User Boxes/Space.com Account}}</div> </div>
 
C

Cygnus_X_1

Guest
<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>1. Why does Dextre have to be assembled rather than shipped up in one piece like CanadaArm2 was?2. Does someone have images showing the pre-assembly layout (the various pieces)?&nbsp; <br /> Posted by willpittenger</DIV></p><p>&nbsp;The SSRMS was folded in half and needed some assembl.</p><p>&nbsp;It was for launch loads </p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> </div>
 
J

JonClarke

Guest
<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>1. Why does Dextre have to be assembled rather than shipped up in one piece like CanadaArm2 was?2. Does someone have images showing the pre-assembly layout (the various pieces)?&nbsp; <br />Posted by willpittenger</DIV></p><p>1) No idea.</p><p>2) http://www.space.gc.ca/asc/img/0627_dextre_08.jpg&nbsp;</p><p>http://www.space.gc.ca/asc/img/0627_dextre_13.jpg</p><p>Jon</p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><em>Whether we become a multi-planet species with unlimited horizons, or are forever confined to Earth will be decided in the twenty-first century amid the vast plains, rugged canyons and lofty mountains of Mars</em>  Arthur Clarke</p> </div>
 
M

MeteorWayne

Guest
<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>1. Why does Dextre have to be assembled rather than shipped up in one piece like CanadaArm2 was?2. Does someone have images showing the pre-assembly layout (the various pieces)?&nbsp; <br />Posted by willpittenger</DIV></p><p>1 Wouldn't fit in the payload bay assembled.</p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font color="#000080"><em><font color="#000000">But the Krell forgot one thing John. Monsters. Monsters from the Id.</font></em> </font></p><p><font color="#000080">I really, really, really, really miss the "first unread post" function</font><font color="#000080"> </font></p> </div>
 
W

willpittenger

Guest
<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>1 Wouldn't fit in the payload bay assembled. <br /> Posted by meteorwayne</DIV></p><p>Why not when folded up?&nbsp; CanadaArm2 did despite being considerably longer than the arm originally designed for that same bay.&nbsp;</p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <hr style="margin-top:0.5em;margin-bottom:0.5em" />Will Pittenger<hr style="margin-top:0.5em;margin-bottom:0.5em" />Add this user box to your Wikipedia User Page to show your support for the SDC forums: <div style="margin-left:1em">{{User:Will Pittenger/User Boxes/Space.com Account}}</div> </div>
 
C

Cygnus_X_1

Guest
<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>Why not when folded up?&nbsp; CanadaArm2 did despite being considerably longer than the arm originally designed for that same bay.&nbsp; <br /> Posted by willpittenger</DIV></p><p>&nbsp;It is not the same design as the arm.&nbsp; It was launch loads on the joints is why it was disassemble </p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> </div>
 
S

SpaceKiwi

Guest
<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'><font color="#3366ff">Why not when folded up?&nbsp; CanadaArm2 did despite being considerably longer than the arm originally designed for that same bay.</font>&nbsp; <br /><strong>Posted by willpittenger</strong></DIV></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>It's not a question of physical dimensions, it's a question of launch environment and weight.&nbsp; As I understand it, DEXTRE would have suffered unacceptably high vibration in a fully assembled config during the climb to orbit.&nbsp; Additionally, DEXTRE was not designed for 1G assembly and elements of the robot would not have been able to bear its own weight.&nbsp; The CSA never completely assembled DEXTRE during any of the manufacturing and testing process on Earth for precisely this reason.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>SK&nbsp; <img src="http://sitelife.space.com/ver1.0/Content/images/store/8/9/a8828026-fb53-4627-a93d-94a841436b09.Medium.gif" alt="" /></p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><em><font size="2" color="#ff0000">Who is this superhero?  Henry, the mild-mannered janitor ... could be!</font></em></p><p><em><font size="2">-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------</font></em></p><p><font size="5">Bring Back The Black!</font></p> </div>
 
L

lampblack

Guest
<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>1. Why does Dextre have to be assembled rather than shipped up in one piece like CanadaArm2 was?2 <br />Posted by willpittenger</DIV><br /><br />I have read elsewhere that the fully assembled Dextre would be unable to support its own weight in earth's gravity. Maybe that has something to do with the "some assembly required" business?</p><p><strong>&nbsp;Edit:</strong> I noticed (after posting) that SpaceKiwi has addressed this more fully.</p><p>&nbsp;Cheers!</p><p>&nbsp;</p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <font color="#0000ff"><strong>Just tell the truth and let the chips fall...</strong></font> </div>
 
B

bobble_bob

Guest
Anyone else thinking of Dextre as a "he" rather than an "it". It was mentioned in the conference, and i have to agree. With its almost human like appearance i do think of it as almost human <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> </div>
 
C

CalliArcale

Guest
Apart from maniacal laughter scenarios, I do tend to think of it as a "he".&nbsp; It's kind of an eerie device, really. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p> </p><p><font color="#666699"><em>"People assume that time is a strict progression of cause to effect, but actually from a non-linear, non-subjective viewpoint it's more like a big ball of wibbly wobbly . . . timey wimey . . . stuff."</em>  -- The Tenth Doctor, "Blink"</font></p> </div>
 
Z

Zipi

Guest
<p>If mr. Dextre is he, when the CSA will build ms. Dextress to avoid him being lonely? :p</p><p>Sorry guys, but I couldn't help myself and I had to post this stupid offtopic "joke" kind of. :)</p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> </div>
 
C

CalliArcale

Guest
Hey, I'd be cool with seeing a Mrs Dextre up there.&nbsp; ;-)&nbsp; Robotics are cool, and robotics in space have that extra tinge of nerdy goodness. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p> </p><p><font color="#666699"><em>"People assume that time is a strict progression of cause to effect, but actually from a non-linear, non-subjective viewpoint it's more like a big ball of wibbly wobbly . . . timey wimey . . . stuff."</em>  -- The Tenth Doctor, "Blink"</font></p> </div>
 
W

willpittenger

Guest
Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>I have read elsewhere that the fully assembled Dextre would be unable to support its own weight in earth's gravity. Maybe that has something to do with the "some assembly required" business?&nbsp;Edit: I noticed (after posting) that SpaceKiwi has addressed this more fully.&nbsp;Cheers!&nbsp; <br /> Posted by lampblack</DIV><br /><br />Personally, I question that Dextre's ability to handle the Hubble mission.&nbsp; No one would have been present to assemble it and there would be no CanadaArm or CanadaArm2 arms to provide it with power. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <hr style="margin-top:0.5em;margin-bottom:0.5em" />Will Pittenger<hr style="margin-top:0.5em;margin-bottom:0.5em" />Add this user box to your Wikipedia User Page to show your support for the SDC forums: <div style="margin-left:1em">{{User:Will Pittenger/User Boxes/Space.com Account}}</div> </div>
 
C

Cygnus_X_1

Guest
<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>Personally, I question that Dextre's ability to handle the Hubble mission.&nbsp; No one would have been present to assemble it and there would be no CanadaArm or CanadaArm2 arms to provide it with power. <br /> Posted by willpittenger</DIV></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Dextre has nothing to do with the Hubble mission. </p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> </div>
 
T

Testing

Guest
<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>Hey, I'd be cool with seeing a Mrs Dextre up there.&nbsp; ;-)&nbsp; Robotics are cool, and robotics in space have that extra tinge of nerdy goodness. <br />Posted by CalliArcale</DIV></p><p>Might I suggest Julie Payette as a starting point? She certainly knows enough about it and will be paying a visit this fall.</p><p>Speaking of DEXTRE, did they install one or two CLPA last night? There was to be two units but I only heard words and had &nbsp;eyes on one. Is the second hidden by the tool holder? No good views.</p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> </div>
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts