Energy-Time Tensor: The Physics of Wonderland Part 1

A clock shows the time gradient that produces gravity, yet the mathematical description of gravity causes the measurable time gradient? Gravity is the product of a time gradient.

The gradient in time between the Earth and space is incredibly small. Yet it takes escape velocity (11 kms) to move through this tiny little difference in time. Time is the mother of all forces.

E=mc2 is the amount of energy (in variable energy units of time) that matter displaces to produce the gradient. A sphere surrounding a mass (at any radius) is equivalent to its energy (currently expressed as gravitational potential). Converting the gravitational potential to gradient time we move from a theoretical property (gravity) to one that we can actually measure.

Unlike the simplified mathematical structure of gravity, a time gradient has complex real properties.

The amount of energy required to remove time from space increases as the mass density of space increases. This is the basis for the Energy-Time Tensor. The Energy-Time Tensor gives rise to other phenomena (😊) in Wonderland but we will restrict this discussion to the Galactic Rotation Curves.

The energy required to displace a unit of time is not fixed. It requires less energy to displace time in weak gravitational fields. Therefore the “gravitational” potential displaces more time in weak space producing a greater force on a mass than calculated by Newton. The greater force corresponds to the observed Doppler shift (velocity proxy) in the Galactic Rotation Curves.

Fn= Gm1m2/r^2 Standard Gravitational Calculation
FET=Fn x (1+ (Mond^2)/(Fn^2) )^1/3

The equation above roughly calculates the energy cost for a mass to displace time relative to a weak local gravitational field. Fn is the classic Newtonian calculation. Be careful to use the cube root and not the square root. It is the volume reverse of the time dilation equation.

This calculation uses the galactic mass that was visually measured for a galaxy (no dark matter calculated in). The acceleration of the temporal gradient (F) is in meters per second squared.

The 1.2e-10 term was publicly published by Mordehai Milgrom.
Mordehai Milgrom’s MOND was not arguing for a change in the mathematics that predicts the gravitational strength (Newton’s original iteration) of r-squared, Milgrom was arguing for a change in a mass’s inertia.

If Newton had access to atomic clocks, he would have a written his equation to represent gravity as a temporal gradient. Newton recognized that he did not know what caused gravity, what he did know, was how to describe gravity with some precision in the local environment.

The r-squared term of Newtonian gravity was an early calculation made with limited observational data. Confounding the phenomena of gravity with a simple mathematical term is an error in logic.
Why is space-time so hard?

There is a big difference between a work field (time displacement) and a stress field (time gradient).

Ok, the wings fell off, but it looked great up until then.