Gravity and Magnetism

nopatience · Aug 3, 2004

Is there a connection between the size of the magnetic field that a celestial body produces and the gravity it sustains?<br /><br />

ironsun · Aug 3, 2004

No. The only connection is that larger bodies can potentially produce larger magnetic fields but that doesn't mean they do or they will. It has more to do with the composition of the body as well as the internal mechanisms of the body.

nopatience · Aug 3, 2004

"The pair suggest that electromagnetism and gravity influence one another enough for gravity's pull to be noticeably affected by the Earth's magnetic field."<br />this article made me look into the connection.<br /><br />http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99992814<br /><br />http://www.mountainman.com.au/news96_f.html<br /><br /> Anybody care to comment on these two articles? Have scientists explored using magnetism to create gravity?<br /><br />"There certainly is gravity in space - it's just not as strong as it is on Earth. The force of gravity exists between any two masses, and depends on how massive they are are how far apart they are. The force of gravity is strong close to Earth (or near any other massive body, such as the Sun or other planets), but gets weaker as you go out in space. Gravity is the force that keeps the relatively tiny mass of a satellite from leaving the orbit of Earth. "<br /><br />

Saiph · Aug 4, 2004

IIRC the swiss team forgot something, like a big lead apparratus in teh basement or something. I'm not sure.<br /><br />It would be nice if it lead to a link, and there is supposed to be one, if you follow the ideaof GUT.<br /><br />My guess though, is it's some error, this time anyway. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p align="center"><font color="#c0c0c0"><br /></font></p><p align="center"><font color="#999999"><em><font size="1">--------</font></em></font><font color="#999999"><em><font size="1">--------</font></em></font><font color="#999999"><em><font size="1">----</font></em></font><font color="#666699">SaiphMOD@gmail.com </font><font color="#999999"><em><font size="1">-------------------</font></em></font></p><p><font color="#999999"><em><font size="1">"This is my Timey Wimey Detector. Goes "bing" when there's stuff. It also fries eggs at 30 paces, wether you want it to or not actually. I've learned to stay away from hens: It's not pretty when they blow" -- </font></em></font><font size="1" color="#999999">The Tenth Doctor, "Blink"</font></p> </div>

Aaupaaq · Aug 5, 2008

<p>The invisible force that everyone has doubts and don't fully understand, I want to explain.  We like to label people, objects, and whatever, and despite labelling, we still call a female person a human and we still call a male person a human.  In much the same way, gravity and magnetism is being misunderstood by a lot of individuals.  I for one is saying that gravity and magnetism is one, but share the same principal.  One characteristics of this force is the "Attraction and Repelling" properties of magnets, everybody knows this I think.  Next, is the weights.  The exact same dimension of two different elements will vary by weight.  For example, wood is lighter than lead.  And last but not least, the atom to atom or cell to cell attraction.  These are the three different manifestations of Gravity and Magnetism.</p><p> </p><p>That is why, all things are magnetic, but we fail to detect them.  For instance, there are magnetic properties within a piece of wood, but we fail to detect them even with our gadgets or whatever.  Because it used to bask in the sandy particles, dirt, which might be magnetic, and the "ElectroMagnetic Field" can be explained. </p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> We always walked on water, like skating! </div>

et_earth · Aug 5, 2008

Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>The invisible force that everyone has doubts and don't fully understand, I want to explain.  We like to label people, objects, and whatever, and despite labelling, we still call a female person a human and we still call a male person a human.  In much the same way, gravity and magnetism is being misunderstood by a lot of individuals.  I for one is saying that gravity and magnetism is one, but share the same principal.  One characteristics of this force is the "Attraction and Repelling" properties of magnets, everybody knows this I think.  Next, is the weights.  The exact same dimension of two different elements will vary by weight.  For example, wood is lighter than lead.  And last but not least, the atom to atom or cell to cell attraction.  These are the three different manifestations of Gravity and Magnetism. That is why, all things are magnetic, but we fail to detect them.  For instance, there are magnetic properties within a piece of wood, but we fail to detect them even with our gadgets or whatever.  Because it used to bask in the sandy particles, dirt, which might be magnetic, and the "ElectroMagnetic Field" can be explained. <br />Posted by Aaupaaq</DIV><br /><br />Are you ready?  <img src="http://sitelife.space.com/ver1.0/Content/images/store/15/1/ff69d0a5-177d-4c1f-81e7-6f6dbbd28bc7.Medium.gif" alt="" />  <p>I take it you think this invisible force is alive. Please give us your definition of alive?</p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> </div>

Mee_n_Mac · Aug 5, 2008

<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>Are you ready?    I take it you think this invisible force is alive. Please give us your definition of alive? <br />Posted by <strong>et_earth</strong></DIV><br /><br />I didn't get the sense from the OP that gravity or magnetism were alive in any sense though I've haven't been paying close attention to his other posts on this topic.  I don't get why he thinks the two "forces" are, to coin a phrase, opposite sides of the same coin.  Gravity is only known to attract while magnetism attracts and repels.  How does the density of various substances play into this topic ?  Why might wood have "magnetism" that we can't detect ?  Huh ???</p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p>-----------------------------------------------------</p><p><font color="#ff0000">Ask not what your Forum Software can do do on you,</font></p><p><font color="#ff0000">Ask it to, please for the love of all that's Holy, <strong>STOP</strong> !</font></p> </div>

a_lost_packet_ · Aug 5, 2008

<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>The invisible force that everyone has doubts and don't fully understand, I want to explain. </DIV></p><p>I don't have any doubts but, you're welcome to introduce some. </p><p>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>We like to label people, objects, and whatever, and despite labelling, we still call a female person a human and we still call a male person a human.  In much the same way, gravity and magnetism is being misunderstood by a lot of individuals.  I for one is saying that gravity and magnetism is one, but share the same principal.</DIV></p><p>Are you saying that gravity and magnetism are the same?  You use the word "but" which would imply that there is a qualifier. </p><p>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>One characteristics of this force is the "Attraction and Repelling" properties of magnets, everybody knows this I think.</DIV></p><p>What is gravity's version of a magnet?  Why? </p><p>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>Next, is the weights.  The exact same dimension of two different elements will vary by weight.  For example, wood is lighter than lead.</DIV></p><p>Wood is not an element.  But, I think I understand what you are saying... Maybe. </p><p>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>And last but not least, the atom to atom or cell to cell attraction.</DIV></p><p>What could "atom to atom" or "cell to cell" attraction (whatever that means) possibly have in comon? </p><p>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>These are the three different manifestations of Gravity and Magnetism. That is why, all things are magnetic, but we fail to detect them.  For instance, there are magnetic properties within a piece of wood, but we fail to detect them even with our gadgets or whatever.  Because it used to bask in the sandy particles, dirt, which might be magnetic, and the "ElectroMagnetic Field" can be explained. Posted by Aaupaaq</DIV></p><p>Wait a sec...</p><p>"That is why all things are magnetic?  Sorry, you forgot to explain "why" all things are magnetic.</p><p>Bits of cereal in a bowl of milk and kitchen magnets do not seem drawn together because of the same reason.  Just because you observe a similiar result does not mean that there is a shared cause. </p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <font size="1">I put on my robe and wizard hat...</font> </div>

derekmcd · Aug 5, 2008

<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>The invisible force that everyone has doubts and don't fully understand, I want to explain.  We like to label people, objects, and whatever, and despite labelling, we still call a female person a human and we still call a male person a human.  In much the same way, gravity and magnetism is being misunderstood by a lot of individuals.  I for one is saying that gravity and magnetism is one, but share the same principal.  One characteristics of this force is the "Attraction and Repelling" properties of magnets, everybody knows this I think.  Next, is the weights.  The exact same dimension of two different elements will vary by weight.  For example, wood is lighter than lead.  And last but not least, the atom to atom or cell to cell attraction.  These are the three different manifestations of Gravity and Magnetism. That is why, all things are magnetic, but we fail to detect them.  For instance, there are magnetic properties within a piece of wood, but we fail to detect them even with our gadgets or whatever.  Because it used to bask in the sandy particles, dirt, which might be magnetic, and the "ElectroMagnetic Field" can be explained. <br /> Posted by Aaupaaq</DIV></p><p>Care to explain how a photon with no mass, no charge and no magnetic moment can be affected by a magnetic field?  For example, explain gravitational lensing due to magnetism.  </p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <div> </div><br /><div><span style="color:#0000ff" class="Apple-style-span">"If something's hard to do, then it's not worth doing." - Homer Simpson</span></div> </div>

a_lost_packet_ · Aug 5, 2008

<p>After carefull consideration, I think the general gist of the OP's approach is this:</p><p>Gravity attracts.</p><p>Magnetism attracts.</p><p>Therefore, magnetism and gravity are the same.</p><p>...</p><p>To which I would think a suitable reply would be:</p><p>Witches burn, therefore, they are made of wood. </p><p>Wood floats.</p><p>Therefore, if she floats, she is made of wood and thus, a WITCH!</p><p><br /> <img src="http://sitelife.space.com/ver1.0/Content/images/store/6/5/66fcf49f-d899-4ed2-b541-6b24b477eccf.Medium.jpg" alt="" /><br /> </p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <font size="1">I put on my robe and wizard hat...</font> </div>

Aaupaaq · Aug 7, 2008

<p>I think almost everyone knows the attraction and repelling properties of magnetic objects.  This is one characteristics of magnetic and gravity I am going to try and explain again.  Provided that we induce some voltage to an metallic element, it becomes magnetic.  Energy from any source is energy.  Action.  </p><p>Now, for the non magnetic particles.  Light, is matter.  You can feel it.  If you did not feel it, you would have not gone to the beach and tan yourself.  These are from the light particles.  Fire, you can see.  What if you break down fire, and all that, you end up with neutrinos.  Slowly cooking you.  Energy, is manifested in a tan.  Also, energy will manifest in a spark or illumination.  Energy is like action.  Travelling.  This invisible force, magnetic force, and when you multiply the magnetic force, you get gravitational.  The size is what we're probably misinterpreting.  But this force is just the same thing.  Since light is matter, travelling towards us, to inside our eye, to the brain, just like water, when it is disturbed, or quicken, you will see the rings of waves pertruding outward.  Pulling toward each other.  Just force rippling toward it, and the end result is the lensing of this gravity.</p><p>The cell to cell and atom to atom pull of all matter should be straight forward when you look them under the microscope.  Attracting each other.  We would need an external force to separate them. </p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> We always walked on water, like skating! </div>

MeteorWayne · Aug 7, 2008

Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>by Aaupaaq</DIV><br /><br />I would strongly suggest you educate yourself further in physics. F=ma would be a good start. A basic understanding of Gravity, electromagnetic force, strong and weak force. Without that most basic understanding, your posts are meaningless strings of words. PLEASE, educate yourself!! Then we can have intelligent converstaions. Your ideas are so far off base, so distant from the reality we measure, we really can't have a useful conversation. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font color="#000080"><em><font color="#000000">But the Krell forgot one thing John. Monsters. Monsters from the Id.</font></em> </font></p><p><font color="#000080">I really, really, really, really miss the "first unread post" function</font><font color="#000080"> </font></p> </div>

greddytalon · Aug 7, 2008

<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>Witches burn, therefore, they are made of wood. Wood floats.Therefore, if she floats, she is made of wood and thus, a WITCH!   <br /> Posted by a_lost_packet_</DIV><br /></p><p>Hahaha, too funny...I think I just pee'd myself laughing! </p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> </div>

derekmcd · Aug 7, 2008

<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>I think almost everyone knows the attraction and repelling properties of magnetic objects.  This is one characteristics of magnetic and gravity I am going to try and explain again.  Provided that we induce some voltage to an metallic element, it becomes magnetic.  Energy from any source is energy.  Action.  Now, for the non magnetic particles.  Light, is matter.  You can feel it.  If you did not feel it, you would have not gone to the beach and tan yourself.  These are from the light particles.  Fire, you can see.  What if you break down fire, and all that, you end up with neutrinos.  Slowly cooking you.  Energy, is manifested in a tan.  Also, energy will manifest in a spark or illumination.  Energy is like action.  Travelling.  This invisible force, magnetic force, and when you multiply the magnetic force, you get gravitational.  The size is what we're probably misinterpreting.  But this force is just the same thing.  Since light is matter, travelling towards us, to inside our eye, to the brain, just like water, when it is disturbed, or quicken, you will see the rings of waves pertruding outward.  Pulling toward each other.  Just force rippling toward it, and the end result is the lensing of this gravity.The cell to cell and atom to atom pull of all matter should be straight forward when you look them under the microscope.  Attracting each other.  We would need an external force to separate them. <br /> Posted by Aaupaaq</DIV></p><p>I'm not even sure where to start with this word salad.  </p><p>I guess I can start with stating that light is generally not considered matter.  At least, not in physics.  The photon can be considered a particle, but it does not obey the Pauli Exclusion Principle.  A photon may add energy to a system, but it does not occupy space.</p><p>Fire does not produce neutrinos and neutrinos pass right through your body without nary an interaction.  Neutrinos are produced through radioactive decay, nuclear reactions and particle collisions.</p><p>What does any of this have to do with gravitational lensing?  Do you even understand what gravitational lensing is? </p><p>Is this stuff you are learning or are you just making this up as you go? </p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <div> </div><br /><div><span style="color:#0000ff" class="Apple-style-span">"If something's hard to do, then it's not worth doing." - Homer Simpson</span></div> </div>

Aaupaaq · Aug 8, 2008

<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>Are you ready?    I take it you think this invisible force is alive. Please give us your definition of alive? <br /> Posted by et_earth</DIV></p><p>What I mean by alive is that the object is not inert.  When something goes forth and back, restrain and constrict, unsqueeze then squeeze.  Then it's alive. </p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> We always walked on water, like skating! </div>

Aaupaaq · Aug 8, 2008

<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>I didn't get the sense from the OP that gravity or magnetism were alive in any sense though I've haven't been paying close attention to his other posts on this topic.  I don't get why he thinks the two "forces" are, to coin a phrase, opposite sides of the same coin.  Gravity is only known to attract while magnetism attracts and repels.  How does the density of various substances play into this topic ?  Why might wood have "magnetism" that we can't detect ?  Huh ??? <br /> Posted by mee_n_mac</DIV></p><p>When I say that the gravity and magnetism are one, I am saying what I am saying.  This invisible force, which we call gravity, is actually a magnet.  But what this gravity does, is extend the effect of magnetic objects to non magnetic objects by falling to the ground.  When this object stops, it did because other matter on the way stopped it from going further down (meaning the crust).  </p><p>If you're ever familiar with metal detectors, we know they work because they only point to the magnetic objects.  When we try to point it to a non magnetic object, the detector will not sound the alarm.  When you point this metal detector, it will not sound, but this wood have magnetic properties which is too miniscule to detect, but it is there.  When you take away the atmosphere, and everything else, objects will react a little differently because I think the atmosphere acts as a damper on the impact. </p><p>Now the density.  Different elements weighs different.  A lead particle is heavier than soapstone, or limestone particle.  When you understand the weight principle, then you can understand which will be heavier to lift up.  This is another property of magnetism, but we would call it specifically, gravity. </p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> We always walked on water, like skating! </div>

Aaupaaq · Aug 8, 2008

<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>I'm not even sure where to start with this word salad.  I guess I can start with stating that light is generally not considered matter.  At least, not in physics.  The photon can be considered a particle, but it does not obey the Pauli Exclusion Principle.  A photon may add energy to a system, but it does not occupy space.Fire does not produce neutrinos and neutrinos pass right through your body without nary an interaction.  Neutrinos are produced through radioactive decay, nuclear reactions and particle collisions.What does any of this have to do with gravitational lensing?  Do you even understand what gravitational lensing is? Is this stuff you are learning or are you just making this up as you go?  <br /> Posted by derekmcd</DIV></p><p>Because of the size of the universe, the Mirage effect is what you're seeing.  Add temperature, it will suddenly start to move like a mirage.  Some people say that a shadow is a two dimensional object.  I'd say it is 3-dimensional.  If you do not believe me, you can have someone stand between you and the sun, then you'll see a shadow.  If you move toward the shadow, you will continue to see this shadow and not the light.  In much the same way, we do not see this so called "Dark matter" and "Dark Energy".  The universe is too big for us to perceive wholly.  We need instruments in order for us to detect all the other energy sources. </p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> We always walked on water, like skating! </div>

MeteorWayne · Aug 8, 2008

<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>When I say that the gravity and magnetism are one, I am saying what I am saying.  This invisible force, which we call gravity, is actually a magnet.  But what this gravity does, is extend the effect of magnetic objects to non magnetic objects by falling to the ground.  When this object stops, it did because other matter on the way stopped it from going further down (meaning the crust).  If you're ever familiar with metal detectors, we know they work because they only point to the magnetic objects.  When we try to point it to a non magnetic object, the detector will not sound the alarm.  When you point this metal detector, it will not sound, but this wood have magnetic properties which is too miniscule to detect, but it is there.  When you take away the atmosphere, and everything else, objects will react a little differently because I think the atmosphere acts as a damper on the impact. Now the density.  Different elements weighs different.  A lead particle is heavier than soapstone, or limestone particle.  When you understand the weight principle, then you can understand which will be heavier to lift up.  This is another property of magnetism, but we would call it specifically, gravity. <br />Posted by Aaupaaq</DIV><br /><br />Your asertions are in a word, laughable. If you paid for your physics education, you should demand your money back, since your ideas disagree with all evidence collected over the last century. </p><p>I am on;y being kind since I assume English is not your first language, because in English, it makes no sense whatsoever. </p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font color="#000080"><em><font color="#000000">But the Krell forgot one thing John. Monsters. Monsters from the Id.</font></em> </font></p><p><font color="#000080">I really, really, really, really miss the "first unread post" function</font><font color="#000080"> </font></p> </div>

et_earth · Aug 8, 2008

Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>What I mean by alive is that the object is not inert.  When something goes forth and back, restrain and constrict, unsqueeze then squeeze.  Then it's alive. <br />Posted by Aaupaaq</DIV><br /><br /><p>I don’t know that you’re describing alive accurately. It seems a balloon could fit your definition.</p><p>p.s. You would first have to squeeze something before it could un-squeeze.</p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> </div>

et_earth · Aug 8, 2008

<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>I didn't get the sense from the OP that gravity or magnetism were alive in any sense though I've haven't been paying close attention to his other posts on this topic.  I don't get why he thinks the two "forces" are, to coin a phrase, opposite sides of the same coin.  Gravity is only known to attract while magnetism attracts and repels.  How does the density of various substances play into this topic ?  Why might wood have "magnetism" that we can't detect ?  Huh ??? <br />Posted by mee_n_mac</DIV></p><p>A definition or explanation of words or terms the op is using is in order; just to ensure everybody is on the same page.</p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> </div>

Mee_n_Mac · Aug 9, 2008

<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>When I say that the gravity and magnetism are one, I am saying what I am saying.  This invisible force, which we call gravity, is actually a magnet.  But what this gravity does, is extend the effect of magnetic objects to non magnetic objects by falling to the ground.  When this object stops, it did because other matter on the way stopped it from going further down (meaning the crust).  Posted by <strong>Aaupaaq</strong></DIV></p><p> When you "extend" magnetism to include non-magnetic materials, indeed all materials, it sure sounds like a different force to me. I don't think you're talking about a Unified Field Theory where gravity and "magnetism" are different elements of a single field, are you ?</p><p>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>If you're ever familiar with metal detectors, we know they work because they only point to the magnetic objects.  When we try to point it to a non magnetic object, the detector will not sound the alarm.  When you point this metal detector, it will not sound, but this wood have magnetic properties which is too miniscule to detect, but it is there.  When you take away the atmosphere, and everything else, objects will react a little differently because I think the atmosphere acts as a damper on the impact. Posted by <strong>Aaupaaq</strong></DIV></p><p> I let this go for the moment but while you might get a response from a metal detector to a piece of wood, it's not for the reasons you state.</p><p>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>Now the density.  Different elements weighs different.  A lead particle is heavier than soapstone, or limestone particle.  When you understand the weight principle, then you can understand which will be heavier to lift up.  This is another property of magnetism, but we would call it specifically, gravity. <br />Posted by <strong>Aaupaaq</strong></DIV><br /><br />Different elements weigh differently because their components have different masses because they are made of more, or less, numbers of the same atomic parts.  Mass is a different property from magnetic "susceptability". Having more mass does not make a thing more "magnetic".  Think about a pound of lead vs a pound of steel.  Both weigh the exact same (1 pound) so gravity is affecting them exactly the same amount, but they are vastly different in their response to a magnet. Why is that do you think ? </p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p>-----------------------------------------------------</p><p><font color="#ff0000">Ask not what your Forum Software can do do on you,</font></p><p><font color="#ff0000">Ask it to, please for the love of all that's Holy, <strong>STOP</strong> !</font></p> </div>

yevaud · Aug 9, 2008

<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>Your asertions are in a word, laughable. If you paid for your physics education, you should demand your money back, since your ideas disagree with all evidence collected over the last century. </p><p>Posted by <em>MeteorWayne</em></DIV></p><p>I have to agree.  This all makes no sense, whatsoever.</p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><em>Differential Diagnosis: </em>"<strong><em>I am both amused and annoyed that you think I should be less stubborn than you are</em></strong>."<br /> </p> </div>

a_lost_packet_ · Aug 9, 2008

<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>I have to agree.  This all makes no sense, whatsoever. <br /> Posted by yevaud</DIV></p><p>Shh...</p><p>I'm trying to find the gravitic poles!  Then, when I reverse them.... MUAHAHAHA!  Any of you puny mortals that don't have your feet stapled to the floor like me are going to be in for a surprise!  MUAHAHAHAHA!</p><p> </p><p> </p><p><br /> <img src="http://sitelife.space.com/ver1.0/Content/images/store/9/11/290107ac-ed85-4f4e-9b54-6918045ac684.Medium.jpg" alt="" /></p><p><br /><font size="7"><strong>/ </strong></font></p><p><br /> <img src="http://sitelife.space.com/ver1.0/Content/images/store/0/11/b0e1fa37-2bd9-4c36-8b60-6645e839d7f7.Medium.gif" alt="" /></p><p><font size="7"><strong>= </strong></font></p><p><br /> <img src="http://sitelife.space.com/ver1.0/Content/images/store/9/13/69cc84f0-fa3e-4814-ad9c-275f4b7d7ec5.Medium.jpg" alt="" /><br /> </p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <font size="1">I put on my robe and wizard hat...</font> </div>

yevaud · Aug 9, 2008

<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>Shh...I'm trying to find the gravitic poles!  Then, when I reverse them.... MUAHAHAHA!  Any of you puny mortals that don't have your feet stapled to the floor like me are going to be in for a surprise!  MUAHAHAHAHA!   + =   <br /> </p><p>Posted by <em>a_lost_packet_</em></DIV></p><p>Emit Verteron Particles from your Emitter Array.  The dimensions will invert, causing a negative chronotron field in local Subspace, which is a good thing; it will save your cookies, yes indeedy!  Or so I am informed.  </p><p>Hell, that's what always worked in STNG.</p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><em>Differential Diagnosis: </em>"<strong><em>I am both amused and annoyed that you think I should be less stubborn than you are</em></strong>."<br /> </p> </div>

a_lost_packet_ · Aug 9, 2008

<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>Emit Verteron Particles from your Emitter Array.  The dimensions will invert, causing a negative chronotron field in local Subspace, which is a good thing; it will save your cookies, yes indeedy!  Or so I am informed.  Hell, that's what always worked in STNG. <br /> Posted by yevaud</DIV></p><p>DANGIT!</p><p>I hocked my Emitter Array for an Orion Slave Girl.  I wonder if I could pick one up in trade for a slightly used Phase Coupler and a couple of Ewoks?  Or, was that a Phase Coupler and a couple of slightly used Ewoks?  I forget.. will have to check inventory. </p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <font size="1">I put on my robe and wizard hat...</font> </div>

Gravity and Magnetism

nopatience

Guest

ironsun

Guest

nopatience

Guest

Saiph

Guest

Aaupaaq

Guest

et_earth

Guest

Mee_n_Mac

Guest

a_lost_packet_

Guest

derekmcd

Guest

a_lost_packet_

Guest

Aaupaaq

Guest

MeteorWayne

Guest

greddytalon

Guest

derekmcd

Guest

Aaupaaq

Guest

Aaupaaq

Guest

Aaupaaq

Guest

MeteorWayne

Guest

et_earth

Guest

et_earth

Guest

Mee_n_Mac

Guest

yevaud

Guest

a_lost_packet_

Guest

yevaud

Guest

a_lost_packet_

Guest

Similar threads

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts

Share this page