R
robnissen
Guest
There is still at least a glimmer of hope in keeping Hubble alive:<br /><br />http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A45041-2005Apr11.html<br /><br />"NASA engineers have taken a successful first step in showing they could service the Hubble Space Telescope using only robots, implicitly challenging NASA headquarters' insistence that Hubble will have to be abandoned because the controversial $470 million mission is too expensive and too difficult. <br /><br />"In an unpublished March 28 letter marking the end of a 'preliminary design review' of the robotic proposal, review chairman Dennis B. Dillman, a NASA engineer, complimented Goddard Space Flight Center's Hubble team for an 'extremely successful' presentation. 'Congratulations are due for reaching this milestone in such [a] short time,' the letter said, urging 'robust support' in 'resources and staffing' for the Hubble team."<br /><br />Of course NASA had to immediately throw a wet blanket on the idea:<br /><br />"NASA's Mark Borkowski, the headquarters program manager for the Hubble Robotic Servicing Mission, said yesterday that the agency did not intend to let a robotic servicing mission proceed and had allowed the preliminary design review to go forward 'because the folks [at Goddard] asked for the opportunity.'" <br /><br />All well, we shall see, maybe the Senate will take up the cause since the Bush administration would rather spend research dollars making new nukes.<br /><br /><br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />