I watched the 1:06 minute video, "How many multiverses are there?"

How Many Multiverses Are There? - YouTube

Watched it and it contained so many of my own pictures, so much of my own modeling, and even used so much of my description, particularly my late description with almost complete alteration in interpretations and deductions, I grew irritated. I knew I was not the only one pursuing forms of my own modeling, that it itself was a paralleling rail to rails others were laying down but then they go off on diverging tangents so irritating to me . . . as mine would be to them.

I take immortality in duplicate universes first, which I've dealt with a few times before. Duplication to infinity where an infinite number of you, exact duplicates of you, are living in exactly the same universes duplicated to infinity. I would tell these seers they will never meet since they are essentially quantum entangled. What I mean is they overlay and inlay in reality into just one (single) universe that is all these infinity of duplicate universes in one. Near duplicates in essentially different path lines is a different story, but the borders of these will never cross because there too many ever more differing borders and universes, to infinity, between.

With my own realization that there is no such thing as infinity of quality, I realized that there is no such thing as infinity of dimensions. Having read and thought much on Complexity Science, I confirmed early on, thanks partly to experience, my own view to my own satisfaction that beyond certain points complexity must collapse and fall in on itself. And complexity is exactly what multi-dimensionality is, so it cannot go beyond relativity's four closing box or bubble dimensions. That is what 3- and 4-dimensionality does, close the system.

The 4th dimension, though, is actually '0', the real bottom dimension with '1' (unity), binary base2 0|1 which mathematicians and physicists have not throughout history and still do not recognize as a bottom base singularity (of base2 [and/or] you will not go below) that I know of. Thus, because the primal / fundamental base is binary base 2 (fbb2 0|1) the 4-dimensional cube can be taken to infinity in number and size, and one finite and infinity within the other, of cube. It both opens and closes systems, and universes. It (fbb2 0|1, the double-barrel positive-negative chain-string, the sandwich of positive energy matter and negative energy anti-matter 'Flatland', and/or [grand unifying relativity's 4-dimensional magic cube) provides self-protection for the universe, and the countless universes of the Infinite Multiverse Universe. Dimensions can be built to infinities, but they always reduce to the base no matter what the infinity. It's there but it does not run away . . . it does not run amok, because it cannot.

The video speaks of sterile universes. Of course, because there are multi-levels, multi-horizons, multi-space-times of every universe of a multiverse. Stephen Hawking wrote of the ever shifting over "Life Zone" of our verse. I write of an infinite 'Flatland' horizontal versus, or perpendicular to, an infinite creative / destructive verticality.

People will have differing views (observations) of . . . differing interpretations of . . . differing dimensions for . . . exactly the same object or subject matter. Often irritating even when largely compatible.

How Many Multiverses Are There? - YouTube

Watched it and it contained so many of my own pictures, so much of my own modeling, and even used so much of my description, particularly my late description with almost complete alteration in interpretations and deductions, I grew irritated. I knew I was not the only one pursuing forms of my own modeling, that it itself was a paralleling rail to rails others were laying down but then they go off on diverging tangents so irritating to me . . . as mine would be to them.

I take immortality in duplicate universes first, which I've dealt with a few times before. Duplication to infinity where an infinite number of you, exact duplicates of you, are living in exactly the same universes duplicated to infinity. I would tell these seers they will never meet since they are essentially quantum entangled. What I mean is they overlay and inlay in reality into just one (single) universe that is all these infinity of duplicate universes in one. Near duplicates in essentially different path lines is a different story, but the borders of these will never cross because there too many ever more differing borders and universes, to infinity, between.

With my own realization that there is no such thing as infinity of quality, I realized that there is no such thing as infinity of dimensions. Having read and thought much on Complexity Science, I confirmed early on, thanks partly to experience, my own view to my own satisfaction that beyond certain points complexity must collapse and fall in on itself. And complexity is exactly what multi-dimensionality is, so it cannot go beyond relativity's four closing box or bubble dimensions. That is what 3- and 4-dimensionality does, close the system.

The 4th dimension, though, is actually '0', the real bottom dimension with '1' (unity), binary base2 0|1 which mathematicians and physicists have not throughout history and still do not recognize as a bottom base singularity (of base2 [and/or] you will not go below) that I know of. Thus, because the primal / fundamental base is binary base 2 (fbb2 0|1) the 4-dimensional cube can be taken to infinity in number and size, and one finite and infinity within the other, of cube. It both opens and closes systems, and universes. It (fbb2 0|1, the double-barrel positive-negative chain-string, the sandwich of positive energy matter and negative energy anti-matter 'Flatland', and/or [grand unifying relativity's 4-dimensional magic cube) provides self-protection for the universe, and the countless universes of the Infinite Multiverse Universe. Dimensions can be built to infinities, but they always reduce to the base no matter what the infinity. It's there but it does not run away . . . it does not run amok, because it cannot.

The video speaks of sterile universes. Of course, because there are multi-levels, multi-horizons, multi-space-times of every universe of a multiverse. Stephen Hawking wrote of the ever shifting over "Life Zone" of our verse. I write of an infinite 'Flatland' horizontal versus, or perpendicular to, an infinite creative / destructive verticality.

People will have differing views (observations) of . . . differing interpretations of . . . differing dimensions for . . . exactly the same object or subject matter. Often irritating even when largely compatible.

Last edited: