Question Is the Universe Only Relatively 13.787B~ Years Old?

[Questioner]

Is the Universe Only Relatively 13.787B~ Years Old?

I believe and there is evidence to support the idea that space volume & time speed are a co-extant function.
A faster time speed is concurrent with a greater volume of space.

The early universe was dense with energy/mass.
It was concurrently shrunken of space.
This quite possibly means time was dilated per the POV of the vast majority of the current universe.

So while technically from an internal POV it's 13.787B~ years old,
if one could use a contemporary clock in its own adjacent time-space bubble & POV the time measured back to the start of the big bang the universe would be vastly older.

The big bang may have been in slo-mo in the molasses of time dilation.

The initial instant might stretch back through a span of time that from our POV approaches infinity.

 

[Gibsense]

Is the Universe Only Relatively 13.787B~ Years Old?

I believe and there is evidence to support the idea that space volume & time speed are a co-extant function.
A faster time speed is concurrent with a greater volume of space.

The early universe was dense with energy/mass.
It was concurrently shrunken of space.
This quite possibly means time was dilated per the POV of the vast majority of the current universe.

So while technically from an internal POV it's 13.787B~ years old,
if one could use a contemporary clock in its own adjacent time-space bubble & POV the time measured back to the start of the big bang the universe would be vastly older.

The big bang may have been in slo-mo in the molasses of time dilation.

The initial instant might stretch back through a span of time that from our POV approaches infinity.

This hints at where Greenlight is 'coming from' in his thread "Isn't expansion just a Lorentz Transformation through time

 

[promytius]

I've never seen a resolution for the length of the time period comprising the so-called beginning of the Universe; if time is just a simple, local measurement, then it's logical to take today and count backwards to what is called the Big Bang, and get a result of 13+ billion years. If time is connected to space, and if space is distorted, time would be as well. The BB was the most intense change we know of, and it makes a certain sense that whatever happened was outside any known science, and that our current understanding of physics doesn't include a complete explanation of the BB.
Space-time has its own mystery for me, never being able to comprehend how a measurement (time) can be altered in any way: a second is a second, always and forever. An inch is an inch, forever, when it is a local measurement. Relativistic measurements are confounding, as things get weird when the astronaut returns 100 years later and has only aged 10 years. Hasn't happened yet, so pure speculation. Seems to me, certainly in my mind, we haven't successfully explained time: static, malleable? I get lost when a measurement is somehow tied to gravity - gravity makes an inch shorter? Speed makes it shorter? I like my Newtonian world.

 

[Classical Motion]

The mass and energy in this cosmos is quantum. Quantum exchanges. In order for the quantum characteristics to be had, this cosmos has one constant length and one constant time.

Distance is not a property of space, it’s a property of mass. Space doesn’t need to be created. Space is the absence of property. It fills infinity.

Light is quantum too. And a quantum shift is much different than a Doppler shift.

And because of that, only ½ of light’s propagation shifts. And the original wavelength and period is contained within it. The emission wavelength is always there. It’s quantum. It’s set and it’s constant.

The suppositions about space expansion, DM, DE, CMBR will continue until someone discovers light.

And a brand new cosmology will begin.

A future supposition.

 

[Gibsense]

've never seen a resolution for the length of the time period comprising the so-called beginning of the Universe; if time is just a simple, local measurement, then it's logical to take today and count backwards to what is called the Big Bang, and get a result of 13+ billion years. If time is connected to space, and if space is distorted, time would be as well. The BB was the most intense change we know of, and it makes a certain sense that whatever happened was outside any known science, and that our current understanding of physics doesn't include a complete explanation of the BB.

Right on!

 

[Gibsense]

I like my Newtonian world.

First Sphereland. Then spacetime.