Life on the moon: Lockheed Martin shares exploration vision for 2044

[Admin]

Lockheed Martin has shared its vision for humanity's future in space, as global space agencies aim for the moon and beyond.

Life on the moon: Lockheed Martin shares exploration vision for 2044 : Read more

 

[ZZTOP]

Lockheed Martin has shared its vision for humanity's future in space, as global space agencies aim for the moon and beyond.

Life on the moon: Lockheed Martin shares exploration vision for 2044 : Read more

LOL, I guess that this means that they gave up on Mars and they will still have to fix the rockets that blow up on takeoff and that cannot get to low Earth orbit without leaking. So 3044 might be more realistic, that is if we are still here

 

[ChrisA]

I agree that in the end exploration will depend more on human-supervised AI then on Elon Musk's vision of a one million-person city on Mars. What would those people do that can't be done by the advanced robots we might have in 50 or 60 years?

Does anyone remember the old 1940s plans to send rockets to the Moon? These ships had large crews with dozens of people because the values that controlled the rockets and the life support system all had to be operated by human hands. Automation has made it so that today we can do unmanned landings even on Mars. The automation will advance over the next 50 to 100 years to the point where the only people we need to send to space are tourists. Tourism will be what drives manned space missions.

In 60 years few people will drive cars on city streets, likewise, there will be no need for human drives in lunar vehicles or pilots in spaceships.

 

[ZZTOP]

I agree that in the end exploration will depend more on human-supervised AI then on Elon Musk's vision of a one million-person city on Mars. What would those people do that can't be done by the advanced robots we might have in 50 or 60 years?

Does anyone remember the old 1940s plans to send rockets to the Moon? These ships had large crews with dozens of people because the values that controlled the rockets and the life support system all had to be operated by human hands. Automation has made it so that today we can do unmanned landings even on Mars. The automation will advance over the next 50 to 100 years to the point where the only people we need to send to space are tourists. Tourism will be what drives manned space missions.

In 60 years few people will drive cars on city streets, likewise, there will be no need for human drives in lunar vehicles or pilots in spaceships.

Everything automated has to be built and maintained by humans unless AI takes over and terminates us like in the movies.

 

[COLGeek]

Everything automated has to be built and maintained by humans unless AI takes over and terminates us like in the movies.

By that logic, AI would be inducing its own extinction.

 

[ZZTOP]

By that logic, AI would be inducing its own extinction.

In reality AI could blast itself into space, design a supervirus and launch it back to Earth and we vanish in 48 or less hours.

 

[COLGeek]

In reality AI could blast itself into space, design a supervirus and launch it back to Earth and we vanish in 48 or less hours.

You are watching too many bad films/shows or reading too many sci-fi novels. We are FAR from such things, if ever.

 

[ZZTOP]

You are watching too many bad films/shows or reading too many sci-fi novels. We are FAR from such things, if ever.

Nope because the Congress has already passed legislation banning AI from nuclear launches. Just like the terminator movies. Google already has a conscious program which means that the DOD has the same

https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/1394#:~:text=Introduced in Senate (05/01/2023)&text=This bill prohibits the use,of launching a nuclear weapon.

S.1394 - Block Nuclear Launch by Autonomous Artificial Intelligence Act of 2023118th Congress (2023-2024)​

Introduced in Senate (05/01/2023)​

Block Nuclear Launch by Autonomous Artificial Intelligence Act of 2023

This bill prohibits the use of federal funds for an autonomous weapons system that is not subject to meaningful human control to launch a nuclear weapon or to select or engage targets for the purposes of launching a nuclear weapon. With respect to an autonomous weapons system, meaningful human control means human control of the (1) selection and engagement of targets: and (2) time, location, and manner of use.

 

[COLGeek]

Nope because the Congress has already passed legislation banning AI from nuclear launches. Just like the terminator movies. Google already has a conscious program which means that the DOD has the same

https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/1394#:~:text=Introduced in Senate (05/01/2023)&text=This bill prohibits the use,of launching a nuclear weapon.

S.1394 - Block Nuclear Launch by Autonomous Artificial Intelligence Act of 2023118th Congress (2023-2024)​

Introduced in Senate (05/01/2023)​

Block Nuclear Launch by Autonomous Artificial Intelligence Act of 2023

This bill prohibits the use of federal funds for an autonomous weapons system that is not subject to meaningful human control to launch a nuclear weapon or to select or engage targets for the purposes of launching a nuclear weapon. With respect to an autonomous weapons system, meaningful human control means human control of the (1) selection and engagement of targets: and (2) time, location, and manner of use.

Sorry. You are over interpreting this. But that is okay. We are safe, in this regard.

Not passed. See status here:

https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/1394/related-bills

 

[ZZTOP]

Sorry. You are over interpreting this. But that is okay. We are safe, in this regard.

Technically the above legislation makes this AI controlled F-16 illegal because F-16's are capable of carrying tactical nuclear weapons as Russia has recently noted

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NaY5rF7n6VE

 

[COLGeek]

Technically the above legislation makes this AI controlled F-16 illegal because F-16's are capable of carrying tactical nuclear weapons as Russia has recently noted

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NaY5rF7n6VE

I think we are done here.