The "eye roll" emoji had to do with the indelicate image of astronauts biologically producing methane in a closed cabin space - for months at at time, and how this "optimum diet" might have some "unintended consequences".
There are a lot of considerations for feeding astronauts on long missions. Unfortunately, the links lead to a paywall, so the only info we get about this study is what is in the article, which is basically an expansion of what is in the abstract. So, it comes across to me as "overselling" the concept of vegetarian diet.
I think it is important to note that there is also work being done to produce "lab-grown meat" and that it might be an important factor for feeding astronauts enroute and in "continuous occupancy" situations on the Moon and Mars. See
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultured_meat .
I think that this study probably has more to it than the article provides. At least, it does indicate that there needs to be a "closed cycle" in the food production and utilization processes. So, it is important to consider what comes out of the astronauts to be recycled into more of what went in.
Regarding your interpretation of my attitude from my remarks, what I am really reacting to is the type of hype that headline writers put on articles like this. "Male astronauts headed to Mars could thrive on this vegetarian salad" makes it sound like male astronauts are going to just love eating it every day for months. The article says "It turns out the optimal space meal is a tasty vegetarian salad," and again that it "was found to be the optimal meal." The article's emphasis is on "
the" optimum meal. That is what I am being critical about.
You did not imply unintended consequences, and if so, you should probably convey complete thoughts to avoid "misinterpretation." I provided a link to the actual study from a reputable source, and while the rest of the information is hidden behind a paywall, don't you have access that was previously provided to you, especially because you want to openly and publicly critique and especially because you recognize that you're limited in the information that you're receiving? Also, libraries are free.
Aren't these studies being developed by astronauts and people who are in the company of them? There was also an emphasis on
could be. You have a personal vendetta against the vegetarian diet, and while I do not adhere to a vegetarian diet and
KNOW that complete proteins are required in moderation, I did not get the impression that this article was "overselling" the concept of a vegetarian diet. Because this is a science-based article, I approached this topic as a scientist.
"
think that this study probably has more to it than the article provides. At least, it does indicate that there needs to be a "closed cycle" in the food production and utilization processes. So, it is important to consider what comes out of the astronauts to be recycled into more of what went in."
You didn't all of that from the article(s)?
Also, I don't understand how you misinterpreted the article as overselling when the article distinctly noted that supplements were required with the vegetarian option. Space is a different environment. There are still studies being performed on the long-term effects of a micro-gravity environment on the body. There are many different factors to consider aside your dislike of, "vegetarian trendism," including but not limited to how heavier proteins and fats are digested in space.
The "salad" is composed of plant-based proteins and softer foods that allow for easier digestion. It is much harder and takes much longer to breakdown meats and from a gastrointestinal perspective, it would make sense that this diet would be the gentlest option.
Yes, I am well aware of the growth of meat on an "agar" plate, lol. That's pretty old information.
Before you approach something critically, you should be more curious and explore before saying something, especially if you're going to attach a negative connotation. Don't read between the lines. Read everything including what's in between.
Hey and fun fact, I found out about this study via
www.weather.com, The Weather Channel, your trusted source for weather-based information.
Have a good one.