Impractical and impossible were words they used before we went to the moon. The late President Kennedy always reminds us "We do things not because they are easy, but because they are hard."
There are other technologies they are working on. Alternate propulsion systems as well as artificial gravity. Even a fossil found on Mars would be worth the trip.
I get your point, however nothing about the then proposed apollo mission required anything outside of the known laws of physics at the time. Which still pretty much exist today. Similar to how the SR-71 was the fastest air breathing jet plane in the early 60s, and remains so today some 60 years later. They ran into a wall of physical laws that nothing could breach, aside from entirely new propulsion systems.
I wasnt aware of "artificial gravity", I do know that centrifigual solutions are a myth. What was that Bruce Willis movie? LOL.
Then theres the issue of shielding the crew in optimum conditions, are mass coronal ejections even survivable?
Keeping humans alive on long missions in space adds so much of a burden in cost and complexity, its probably best we put that part aside until technology catches up.
I hope we are beyond the silliness of doing it just to beat the enemy at it. I could be wrong...
On another note I partly share Stephen Hawkings feelings on space exploration. That golden record on Voyager might look like a Dennys menu to the wrong species! We really have this naive notion that advanced civilizations are so much so that they would be past warfare and aggression and must want to help us. Think of humans coming across a field of cows or sheep. We use them as we needed with zero concern for their wishes. We should expect the same toward us.