My Time Theorem, Einstein's "Theory of Everything"??

[yourmanjoe]

Since 1975 I had a theory relating to time and black holes. In all these years, I figured I would see someone else come up with the same theory, but as yet, never have. Soo, with the power of the internet I decided it wouldn't hurt to thorw it out there for the world community for feed-back.<br /><br />Although I am not a professional physicist, I think many of you will be interested in my T=1∞ theorem.<br /><br />I feel it could quite possibly be the answer to Einsteins final years search for the simple mathematical theory for our universe.<br /><br />It is more than can be posted here, but if you would care to look at the page I created and let me know what you think I would appreciate it: http://www.studio960pd.com/timetheorem.htm<br /><br />Thanks,<br />Joe

 

[vandivx]

what I fail to see is what use would all that be<br /><br />vanDivX <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> </div>

 

[yourmanjoe]

I can understand your comment, but I think it COULD help support or relate to Peter Lynds theory as in the article I found here when I was researching where to post my theory:<br />http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/time_theory_030806.html<br />

 

[billslugg]

yourmanjoe<br /><br />Welcome to Space Dot Com Joe! Good to have you here. I have read the first paragraph of your cover letter.<br /><br /><font color="yellow">"I need to preclude this article with the acknowledgement that I am not an advanced mathematician, nor a physicist. My intention is to make known a theory I have had since my senior year in high school, 1975. I further want to emphasize that I present this NOT as a science fiction basis, but a real possibility and hope that it finds the ears of professional physicists for review."</font><br /><br />"I need to preclude this article..." has no meaning. You might use the word "preface". Look up both and report back.<br />"...NOT as a science fiction basis..." Lose the CAPS. The word "as" should be "on". <br />Instead of ears, you should hope it finds their eyes.<br /><br />You fix these and I'll go get some more.<br /> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p> </p><p> </p> </div>

 

[yourmanjoe]

Thanks Bill. I made the corrections as noted.<br />Your grammar notations are appreciated.

 

[yourmanjoe]

I could be entirely wrong as I am not completely up to date as to exactly what was known of black holes at the time of his death, but:<br />It is my impression that the theory of black holes was in existence, but not actually observed. Today, we have seen evidence of their existance, and is pretty much accepted.<br />Secondly, once the scientific community agreed as to their existance, the question was shortly followed with if it was possible that these black holes could eventually "pull back" all of the universe into black holes. It seems to me that recent studies have concluded that it could in fact be a possibility.<br />These are the facts that lead me to my hypothesis. Wether or not the "time" factor is a reality is another question.

 

[yourmanjoe]

Hi Tim,<br />I wish to address your question "I take you do not believe in the possibilty that the universe is static yet infinite?"<br />On the contrary, I think my hypothesis implies exactly that.<br /><br />Aside from that, I pose another question. If in fact the theorem were correct, could it not also help define ONE and ∞ ??

 

[alokmohan]

I like to know what is a mini black hole?I like to t see if you think they exist.