> <i><font color="yellow"> Personally I think NASA had the nads all along.</font>/i><br /><br />What I like is the honest and open evaluation of the risks and then choosing to go ahead anyways.<br /><br />One the major failures of NASA revealed during the Challenger accident review was the chasm between the estimated probability of failure for engineers (1 in 100) and managers (1 in 100,000). If you believe there is only a 1 in 100,000 chance of failure, it doesn't take any courage to launch. If you believe there is a 1 in 100 chance of failure, it does take courage to launch -- especially when you know there are another ~17 launches that must follow.</i>