NASA Lied. Plain. Simple. Proof. UPDATED! New Earth Distance!

[hey_amigo]

<span class="postbody">this is an article i wrote disproving science and existance of planets <br /> <br /> it is currently uploaded at 2 places. <br /> <br /> check out either of the links below. <br /> <br /> http://pastebin.com/f1bca4e76 <br /> <br /> http://www.scribd.com/full/4816885?access_key=key-13a1xtivs8rikoxt5r31 <br /> <br /> please note: when i speak of surface area, i mean that of a picture of a sphere, wich is in fact a circle. <br /> <br /> i send my apologies, the weight of telescope owners, out weighs my theory of no planets. <br /> <br /> my main reason for thinking planets were fake are that when i look at a picture of what appears to be outer space or a planet, even earth. it appears fake. it just coincides that i debunked their calculations about planets.</span>

 

[hey_amigo]

<span class="postbody">this is an article i wrote disproving science and existance of planets <br /> <br /> it is currently uploaded at 2 places. <br /> <br /> check out either of the links below. <br /> <br /> http://pastebin.com/f1bca4e76 <br /> <br /> http://www.scribd.com/full/4816885?access_key=key-13a1xtivs8rikoxt5r31 <br /> <br /> please note: when i speak of surface area, i mean that of a picture of a sphere, wich is in fact a circle. <br /> <br /> i send my apologies, the weight of telescope owners, out weighs my theory of no planets. <br /> <br /> my main reason for thinking planets were fake are that when i look at a picture of what appears to be outer space or a planet, even earth. it appears fake. it just coincides that i debunked their calculations about planets.</span>

 

[DrRocket]

<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>this is an article i wrote disproving science and existance of planets it is currently uploaded at 2 places. check out either of the links below. http://pastebin.com/f1bca4e76 http://www.scribd.com/full/4816885?access_key=key-13a1xtivs8rikoxt5r31 please note: when i speak of surface area, i mean that of a picture of a sphere, wich is in fact a circle. i send my apologies, the weight of telescope owners, out weighs my theory of no planets. my main reason for thinking planets were fake are that when i look at a picture of what appears to be outer space or a planet, even earth. it appears fake. it just coincides that i debunked their calculations about planets. <br />Posted by hey_amigo</DIV></p><p>This was nonsense when you posted it on another board and it is nonsense here also.</p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> </div>

 

[hey_amigo]

<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>This was nonsense when you posted it on another board and it is nonsense here also. <br /> Posted by DrRocket</DIV></p><p>prove me wrong mathematicly and and i might agree its non-sense </p>

 

[derekmcd]

<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>prove me wrong mathematicly and and i might agree its non-sense <br /> Posted by hey_amigo</DIV></p>How could NASA be lying when, over 300 years ago, a few astronomers using trigonometry figured this stuff out?&nbsp; The only useful numbers you provided were the radii of the sun/planets. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <div> </div><br /><div><span style="color:#0000ff" class="Apple-style-span">"If something's hard to do, then it's not worth doing." - Homer Simpson</span></div> </div>

 

[JonClarke]

<p>Posting the same stuff in different threads is spamming the boards.&nbsp; The mods take this very seriously.</p><p>Jon</p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><em>Whether we become a multi-planet species with unlimited horizons, or are forever confined to Earth will be decided in the twenty-first century amid the vast plains, rugged canyons and lofty mountains of Mars</em>  Arthur Clarke</p> </div>

 

[nimbus]

Do you disprove science? &nbsp; <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> </div>

 

[rfoshaug]

<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>this is an article i wrote disproving science and existance of planets it is currently uploaded at 2 places. check out either of the links below. http://pastebin.com/f1bca4e76 http://www.scribd.com/full/4816885?access_key=key-13a1xtivs8rikoxt5r31 please note: when i speak of surface area, i mean that of a picture of a sphere, wich is in fact a circle. i send my apologies, the weight of telescope owners, out weighs my theory of no planets. my main reason for thinking planets were fake are that when i look at a picture of what appears to be outer space or a planet, even earth. it appears fake. it just coincides that i debunked their calculations about planets. <br /> Posted by hey_amigo</DIV></p><p>I've got a few questions for you:</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Why would anyone lie about the existence or distance of planets around the sun?</p><p>How does this help anyone "pocket taxpayers dollars"? How do you make money on such a lie, and wouldn't there be a lot of money for astronomers who would debunk such a lie decades or even centuries ago, if it's so simple to prove wrong? Why haven't they already done so? </p><p>What does NASA have to do with it? You do know that there are astronomers around the world that have calculated the masses and distances of objects in our solar system for centuries, right? That don't have anything to do with NASA, right?</p><p>Why does <em>everything</em> have to be a hoax and a conspiracy in this day and age?</p><p>Why should I believe the statements by someone who calls himself/herself "hey_amigo" more seriously than the statements of the world's astronomers who even dare to state their real name in the papers where they publish their calculations and findings?</p><p>Why should I ever bother spending even just half an hour of my life reading through your calculations "proving" everyone else in the world wrong?</p><p>Are all lunar probes, landers, and orbiters (manned and unmanned, American, European, Russian, Japanese and Chinese) hoaxes? Why whould all these countries help NASA (or whoever) "pocket taxpayers dollars" in the USA? </p><p>Did you actually also disprove science in your paper? Did you disprove it scientifically then? </p><p>Do you often feel that you are the only sane person in an insane world filled with conspiracies, government lies, and hoaxes?</p><p>Do you have one of those tin foil hats so that the government can't read your thoughts? If so, have you discussed this with your therapist?</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Ok, I'll stop now. I think you get the point. But maybe I'm just paid by the US. government (even though I'm Norwegian) to ridicule your claims. </p><p><img src="http://sitelife.space.com/ver1.0/content/scripts/tinymce/plugins/emotions/images/smiley-laughing.gif" border="0" alt="Laughing" title="Laughing" /></p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font color="#ff9900">----------------------------------</font></p><p><font color="#ff9900">My minds have many opinions</font></p> </div>

 

[rfoshaug]

<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>this is an article i wrote disproving science and existance of planets it is currently uploaded at 2 places. check out either of the links below. http://pastebin.com/f1bca4e76 http://www.scribd.com/full/4816885?access_key=key-13a1xtivs8rikoxt5r31 please note: when i speak of surface area, i mean that of a picture of a sphere, wich is in fact a circle. i send my apologies, the weight of telescope owners, out weighs my theory of no planets. my main reason for thinking planets were fake are that when i look at a picture of what appears to be outer space or a planet, even earth. it appears fake. it just coincides that i debunked their calculations about planets. <br /> Posted by hey_amigo</DIV></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>You know, posting the same topic in several sub-forums is spamming. </p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font color="#ff9900">----------------------------------</font></p><p><font color="#ff9900">My minds have many opinions</font></p> </div>

 

[JonClarke]

Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>This was nonsense when you posted it on another board and it is nonsense here also. <br />Posted by DrRocket</DIV><br /><br />Google is a wonderful thing.&nbsp; It shows that this twit has spammed at&nbsp;three other boards with the same rubbish in the last few days, in addition to this one. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><em>Whether we become a multi-planet species with unlimited horizons, or are forever confined to Earth will be decided in the twenty-first century amid the vast plains, rugged canyons and lofty mountains of Mars</em>  Arthur Clarke</p> </div>

 

[a_lost_packet_]

<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>this is an article i wrote disproving science and existance of planets it is currently uploaded at 2 places. check out either of the links below. http://pastebin.com/f1bca4e76 http://www.scribd.com/full/4816885?access_key=key-13a1xtivs8rikoxt5r31 please note: when i speak of surface area, i mean that of a picture of a sphere, wich is in fact a circle. i send my apologies, the weight of telescope owners, out weighs my theory of no planets. my main reason for thinking planets were fake are that when i look at a picture of what appears to be outer space or a planet, even earth. it appears fake. it just coincides that i debunked their calculations about planets. <br /> Posted by hey_amigo</DIV></p><p>..</p><p>I tried to read whatever the heck it was you wrote...&nbsp; I am still trying to recover from that.</p><p>There's no point trying to "disprove" anything that you have to say on the matter.&nbsp; There's no reason to.&nbsp; It'd be like trying to disprove the existence of the Chesire Cat to a madman.&nbsp; It just doesn't serve a purpose.</p><p>Have fun at the tea party. </p><p>&nbsp;</p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <font size="1">I put on my robe and wizard hat...</font> </div>

 

[3488]

<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'><font color="#ff0000">..I tried to read whatever the heck it was you wrote...&nbsp; I am still trying to recover from that.There's no point trying to "disprove" anything that you have to say on the matter.&nbsp; There's no reason to.&nbsp; It'd be like trying to disprove the existence of the Chesire Cat to a madman.&nbsp; It just doesn't serve a purpose.Have fun at the tea party. &nbsp; <br />Posted by a_lost_packet_</font></DIV></p><p><font size="2"><strong>Perhaps the&nbsp;therapist needs to review amigo's&nbsp;medication.</strong></font></p><p><font size="2"><strong>Andrew Brown.<br /></strong></font></p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font color="#000080">"I suddenly noticed an anomaly to the left of Io, just off the rim of that world. It was extremely large with respect to the overall size of Io and crescent shaped. It seemed unbelievable that something that big had not been visible before".</font> <em><strong><font color="#000000">Linda Morabito </font></strong><font color="#800000">on discovering that the Jupiter moon Io was volcanically active. Friday 9th March 1979.</font></em></p><p><font size="1" color="#000080">http://www.launchphotography.com/</font><br /><br /><font size="1" color="#000080">http://anthmartian.googlepages.com/thisislandearth</font></p><p><font size="1" color="#000080">http://web.me.com/meridianijournal</font></p> </div>

 

[KickLaBuka]

<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>this is an article i wrote disproving science and existance of planets it is currently uploaded at 2 places. check out either of the links below. http://pastebin.com/f1bca4e76 http://www.scribd.com/full/4816885?access_key=key-13a1xtivs8rikoxt5r31 please note: when i speak of surface area, i mean that of a picture of a sphere, wich is in fact a circle. i send my apologies, the weight of telescope owners, out weighs my theory of no planets. my main reason for thinking planets were fake are that when i look at a picture of what appears to be outer space or a planet, even earth. it appears fake. it just coincides that i debunked their calculations about planets. <br />Posted by hey_amigo</DIV><br /><br />Dude,</p><p>The sun is eclipsed by the moon because the moon is close to the earth.&nbsp; Try thinking about the distance from the earth to the moon, and draw lines from a single point on the earth to each side of the moon.&nbsp; In 2-d, you make a triangle with height (distance from earth to moon) and base (diameter of moon).&nbsp; Extend that triangle until you reach the sun, and you've set up similar triangles.</p><p>&nbsp;</p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p>-KickLaBuka</p> </div>

 

[Limo_God]

<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>Perhaps the&nbsp;therapist needs to review amigo's&nbsp;medication.Andrew Brown. <br />Posted by 3488</DIV><br /><br />I'm not sure a review of medication would help...</p><p>&nbsp;And just out of curiosity, how does "proving" an "error" in distance calculations "prove" the planets are not there?</p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><strong>Sermo datur cuntis; animi sapientia paucis</strong></p><p><em>Speech is given to many; intelligence to few</em></p> </div>