New model of the Universe

Status
Not open for further replies.
Mar 4, 2021
34
2
35
Formation of continents.

Take a close look at the animation of two huge, diametrically opposed formations on the surface of the earth’s core. They cannot but be directly related to the formation of continents. They are both biased to the same direction (east). Continents are displaced from them to the east. Compare with the official model for the formation of continents. These huge structures are contrary to the official model of the formation of continents.


The Unsolved Mystery of the Earth Blobs

The Cordillera – the Andes, the Iranian highlands – the Himalayas – are also two huge formations of a similar shape, also diametrically opposed to each other. Both are displaced to the east of two huge formations of the Earth’s core (HFEC). Cordillera – The Andes are displaced further from their HFEC and are more split. Iranian Highlands – The Himalayas are closer to their HFEC, and are strongly displaced to the north.



New model of the Universe.

From the above, we can conclude that before the moment of the so-called “Big Bang” in the Universe there was a certain material sphere with a diameter of about 20 thousand km, the substance in which was in the stage of the limit of density (the state of singularity). Let’s call this sphere ProtoEarth.



As a result of certain processes at the Proto-Earth’s poles two PreContinents were gradually formed – PreAmerica (North America, South America and Antarctica) and PreEurasia (Africa, Eurasia and Australia), in the centers of which the Sun and the Moon were gradually formed. Parallel to this, water was formed in a wide strip of the proto-Earth’s equator as a result of certain processes. At a certain moment, a critical mass difference accumulated at the poles, the equilibrium of the system was violated, the separation of the Sun and the Moon began, the proto-Earth’s axis of rotation shifted from conditional zero degrees to the current 23.5 degrees, and the formation of modern continents.

. . .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mar 4, 2021
34
2
35
. . .

(a huge trail of clearly cosmic origin between South America and Antarctica, animation of the trajectory of a solar eclipse shadow and a schematic drawing)

A few more arguments in favor of this model of the Universe:

-
The coincidence of the apparent diameters of the Sun and the Moon in the sky.
- The coincidence of the axial periods of rotation of the Sun and the Moon (27 days).
- Only Mercury and Venus have no satellites.
- Only Mercury and Venus have incommensurably large periods of rotation around their axes 58 and 243 days, respectively (Earth, Mars – 1 day; Jupiter, Saturn – 16, 17 hours; Uranus, Neptune – 9, 10 hours).
- In each lower conjunction (that is, during the closest approach to the Earth) Venus is facing the Earth by the same side.


(schematic comparison of the official and new model of the Universe; ProtoEarth, Moon, Sun, Venus, Mercury, Mars and common center of masses between Earth and Sun)

. . .
 
Mar 4, 2021
34
2
35
. . .
Thus, it is very similar to the fact that the Universe looks approximately like on the Tycho Brahe's model of the Universe, only with the correction for the rotation of the Earth and the Sun around the common center of mass. The Oort cloud is the border of the Universe, where all the “stars” and “galaxies” formed from the ProtoEarth's mantle, with diameters not exceeding several tens of kilometers, are located. The diameter of the Universe, presumably, does not exceed one light minute.



In all this, a correct understanding of the rotation of the Earth and the Sun around a common center of mass is very important. The ratio of diameters is approximately the same as in the animation (the Earth is larger, the Sun is smaller).



Addition.

The rotation of Venus around the Sun is very similar to the rotation of the Moon around the Earth, except for the direction of rotation. That is, Venus is not always facing the Sun with one side, but in each lower conjunction (that is, during the closest approach to the Earth) Venus is facing the Earth by the same side. As you can see from the quote above, in the official model of the solar system there is no explanation for such an orbital phenomenon of Venus, because it can in no way be a coincidence or the result, of the tidal interaction of the Earth and Venus (at least with the official parameters of the solar system). The Moon is tidally locked to the Earth, which means that it always shows one face to our planet. Venus is also tidally locked to the Earth. It is a fact, but this fact have no explanation and is impossible in the official model of the Solar System (with approximately same sizes of Earth and Venus of about 12 thousand kilometers in diameter). According to my rough estimates, the diameter of Venus is approximately 24 km., Mercury ~ 10 km., Mars ~ 14 km.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rod
Mar 4, 2021
34
2
35
The nature of light.

A photon has energy and momentum (weight) but no mass. It is obvious that light is vibrations of some medium (ether). This environment cannot but have resistance, damping or absorbing light vibrations with time and distance. I will describe the essence in simple words so as not to complicate and not drag out the explanation.

1) Water waves.
They spread longer (in time) than sound, but at a shorter distance (at a lower speed). Distribution medium: water.

2) Sound waves.
The lifetime of sound waves is shorter than that of water waves, but the speed (and distance) is greater. Distribution medium: atmosphere (gas).

3) Light waves.
By analogy, the lifetime of light waves should be much shorter than the lifetime of sound waves, but since the speed of light is about 300,000 km/s - the propagation distance is greater. Distribution medium: aether.


(a schematic representation of a photon - a conventional unit of oscillation (wave) of the aether) Image text translation: The movement of one light wave (photon) from the source to complete attenuation and / or absorption by the medium (aether).

At the beginning of the 20th century, scientists rejected the completely plausible hypothesis of the Tired Light, began to carry out fortune-telling by redshifts of the spectrum (like on coffee grounds, only by the spectral emissions), and billions of light years, black holes, dark energies, and distant-distant galaxies rushed.

Light years?

A photon cannot exist not only for years, but even for minutes. Example. Standing in the lake. You throw a stone. First you hear the sound, later the waves come. Waves on water, sound waves in a gaseous medium and light waves in ether are phenomena of the same nature, but of different orders due to the environment. If waves on water “live” for minutes, and sound waves in a gaseous medium “live” for seconds, then light waves in their medium (ether) “live” for a fraction of a second. All this depends on the power of the source of wave oscillations, so it can be assumed that light waves from the Sun can exist for several seconds, but not more (not minutes, and even less years).

Even if in the space environment (vacuum) there is no resistance, there is no heat exchange, then the distance is overcome (volume expansion with distance), which cannot occur absolutely without energy consumption. In addition, the space of the cosmic vacuum cannot be absolutely empty. There cannot but be certain, albeit minimal, resistance and heat transfer. Light years and 8 light minutes from Sun to Earth are physically impossible.

Again. Attentively. This is very important to understand. Overcoming distance in any environment, that is, regardless of the environment, cannot occur without energy consumption (or with zero energy consumption). Since a photon has a very low energy charge, and a very high speed of movement, and no medium (including space) can have absolutely zero resistance, then, accordingly, the lifetime (life) of one photon (wave oscillation of the medium - ether) is very short, not exceeding at least one minute.

Definition. The lifetime of a unit of wave oscillations (one wave) is inversely proportional to the speed of their propagation (or directly proportional to the inertia of the medium) and is directly proportional to the power of their source.

Since the aether is not scientifically recognized, it turns out that a photon is a conventional unit of wave oscillations of an incomprehensible medium? A photon has weight (energy and momentum), but no mass - it is obvious that this is an oscillation (wave) of some medium (aether).

Addition.

If the distance from the Earth to the Sun were 150,000,000 km, that is, 8 light minutes, then the STEREO Ahead and STEREO Behind spacecraft would simply be impossible to control, and it would be impossible to receive any data from them. For example. STEREO A (itself being in constant motion in orbit) sends a signal to the Earth that flies in space for 8 minutes, and during this time the Earth moves in orbit for 8 minutes. * 60 sec. * 30 km/s = 14 400 km. Not to mention the enormous degree of radio signal scattering over distances of tens of millions of kilometers or several light minutes.


(animation of the movement of STEREO spacecrafts around the Sun)

There is a photo animation on the web that shows a solar flare in the direction of one of these satellites. The STEREO Ahead spacecraft supposedly moves along the Earth's orbit, that is, at the same distance from the Sun as the Earth. This is an animation of STEREO A photos from July 23, 2012.



The solar flare flew exactly in the direction of STEREO A. It began at almost exactly 03:00 (UTC), and the first visible particles of coronal matter (white ripples in the animation) flew to STEREO A at about 07:00 (UTC). If the distance from the Sun to the Earth's orbit (on which the STEREO spacecraft are located) were 150,000,000 km, as is officially believed, then the speed of coronal material particles would be 150,000,000 km. / 4 hours / 60 minutes / 60 seconds = about 10,000 km / s. - this is 3% of the speed of light, which is hardly physically possible.

The solar wind is a stream of ionized particles (mainly helium-hydrogen plasma) flowing out from the solar corona at a speed of 300-1200 km/s into the surrounding space.

In addition, it is generally known that the flow of coronal matter from a solar flare reaches the Earth's orbit (in which the STEREO spacecraft are supposedly located) in an average of 150,000,000 km. / 750 km / s / 60 sec. / 60 min. / 24 hours = ~ 2.5 - 3 days. But in fact, the animation of the photos turns out to be 07:00 (UTC) - 03:00 (UTC) = 4 hours. Looks like it turns out this way, because STEREO spacecrafts are located on the orbit of Venus (around the Sun), and SOHO spacecraft is located in common center of mass between the Earth and the Sun in the Solar System (Universe) with approximately the same parameters as in the schematic image below.


(ProtoEarth, Sun, Moon, Mercury, Venus, Mars; common center of mass between Earth and Sun; distance to the Moon is about 100 000 km., distance to the Sun is about 300 000 km.; Oort Cloud is the border of the Universe where all the "stars" and "galaxies" located; the diameter of the Universe does not exceed one light minute)

The rotation of the Earth and the Sun, as two commensurate objects, around a common center of mass, is difficult to describe in words and to draw schematically - therefore, I end the article with a corresponding animation, in which the size ratios are close to reality (the Earth is larger, the Sun is smaller).

 

rod

Oct 22, 2019
1,877
655
2,560
Well in this discussion we have the universe with a specific diameter disclosed. "The diameter of the Universe, presumably, does not exceed one light minute.", post 1. Using Special Relativity, that is about 0.12 au distance based upon the standard heliocentric solar system definition for the astronomical unit, 1 au. The diameters of Venus ~ 24 km, Mercury ~ 10 km, Mars ~ 14 km in post #1. So what is the arcminute size of these planets then that I view using my telescopes? Tycho Brahe model was geo-heliocentric solar system where the Sun and planets revolved around the Sun and the system moved around the immovable Earth.
 

rod

Oct 22, 2019
1,877
655
2,560
FYI. The Tycho Brahe model for the solar system and stars is very different in distances and sizes compared to the modern, heliocentric solar system model. Of Mites and Men: Johannes Kepler on Stars and Size, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018arXiv180203313G/abstract

My observation, the Tycho Brahe solar system did not predict stellar parallax because the Earth was considered immovable and the astronomical unit of Tycho Brahe and Kepler was 1200 earth radii or 0.05 AU using the modern, heliocentric solar system. Astronomy distances and sizes changed greatly with the development of the heliocentric solar system model and telescope observations of Mars parallax, the solar parallax, and later stellar parallax for stars like 61 Cygni. This includes the size or diameter of stars too. This thread has the universe diameter 0.12 AU, see post #1 and #2.
 
Mar 4, 2021
34
2
35
Look closely at the scale of the relief, the number of objects on the surface. Four volcanoes and a huge half-planet canyon with a diameter of 6,779 km.? The four mountains on Mars are the remnants of the outer shell. A huge canyon (Mariner Valley) - a crack in the inner shell. The entire relief is clearly visible in one small photo. Too monotonous landscape for the official diameter of 6,779 kilometers.



Scale comparison of satellite photos of Earth and Mars shows that Mars' scale is greatly oversized.
 
Mar 4, 2021
34
2
35
Suspicious correlation between Betelgeuse brightness and solar activity.

Betelgeuse is estimated to be 642.5 light years away. Why is dynamics of brightness of Betelgeuse so closely aligned with the dynamics of solar activity?

Diagram source link.


Diagram source link.

Moreover, in addition to the correlation with 10-13 years solar cycles on the Betelgeuse brightness graph, there are clear 1 year cycles of brightness fluctuations also visible. Based on this fact, I assume that Betelgeuse, like all other "stars" and "galaxies", are located in the Oort Cloud and reflect sunlight.

Annual cyclicity of Betelgeuse brightness fluctuations.

The annual cyclical fluctuations in the brightness of Betelgeuse can be explained by the suggestion that in December the Sun is farther from it, and in June - is closer to it (considering the rotation of the Earth and the Sun as in the animation below, the Earth is larger). Betelgeuse is located in the constellation Orion. Sun in Orion (Orion behind Sun) is in June.



 

rod

Oct 22, 2019
1,877
655
2,560
Staying focused on post #1 and #2 here, the size and distances for the universe and planets are all wrong. The universe size is 0.12 au in diameter. An object as measured from Earth at 0.12 au distance from Earth with angular size 1 arcsecond, ~ 87 km in diameter. Just look at those sizes for Mars, Venus, and Mercury in the discussion. I used my telescopes 7x in October 2020 to enjoy the Mars opposition. Observations ranged from 10x to 216x using my 10-inch telescope. Mars is clearly not 1 arcsecond size or less. How the Universe Works in this discussion is all wrong. So focus on Mars size please. Stay on target, stay on target :) We in the community here need to see the distance of Mars from Earth and its true angular size as determined by the 14 km diameter claimed. This is too easy to test, including the 1672 Mars parallax measurement that took place and begin defining the true dimensions of our solar system. Betelgeuse star has a specific angular size measured today too. No need to look at Betelgeuse, look at the solar system and universe 0.12 au in diameter.
 

COLGeek

Moderator
Apr 3, 2020
545
260
1,260
  • Like
Reactions: rod

rod

Oct 22, 2019
1,877
655
2,560
I am sorry, my friend, but these "observations" are not factual in any way.



Regarding Betelgeuse, coincidental or anecdotal observations? Presenting the data in a way to make a particular argument?
Remember, are the solar observations plotted to the same scale and brightness of Betelgeuse observations.
 
  • Like
Reactions: COLGeek

rod

Oct 22, 2019
1,877
655
2,560

This is a new report on Betelgeuse. What about Mars and the distance from Earth to be 14 km in diameter? What will be Mars angular size as measured by telescopes?
 
  • Like
Reactions: COLGeek
Mar 4, 2021
34
2
35
Official diameter of Mercury is 4.8 thousand km, Moon - 3.5 thousand km.
Look at large craters with long, light streaks.
Stripes from one of such craters on Mercury cover (encircle) it completely. The Moon also has several such craters with long light stripes, but they are much smaller (shorter) relative to the Moon's surface.
Moon's diameter is about 500-700 km. The diameter of Mercury is about 10 km.
 

COLGeek

Moderator
Apr 3, 2020
545
260
1,260
Official diameter of Mercury is 4.8 thousand km, Moon - 3.5 thousand km.
Look at large craters with long, light streaks.
Stripes from one of such craters on Mercury cover (encircle) it completely. The Moon also has several such craters with long light stripes, but they are much smaller (shorter) relative to the Moon's surface.
Moon's diameter is about 500-700 km. The diameter of Mercury is about 10 km.
No. This is not true.

What is your source for these claims?
 
  • Like
Reactions: rod
Mar 4, 2021
34
2
35
Why in the SDO satellite photo, the Moon has a clear (not defocused) outline, given the fact that the camera is clearly focused on the Sun (the surface structure is clearly visible), and the “fact” that the Sun is officially 400 times farther than the Moon? This is also because the Moon has no atmosphere, but with a distance difference of 400 times and a clear focus on the Sun's surface, the Moon's contour cannot be as clear as in that SDO photo.
My rough estimations: distance to the Moon is about 100 000 km.; distance to the Sun is about 300 000 km.
So I think that the Sun is actually about 3 times farther and bigger than the Moon.
 
Mar 4, 2021
34
2
35
Traces of the Sun and Moon on the Earth's surface.

Huge mystery blob found under the moon's far side.
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/massive-blob-discovered-moon-surface
Title of the recent russian article and quote from it:
The largest crater of the moon helped scientists figure out how our satellite was formed
Quote
Scientists decided to clarify the process of the formation of the Moon by studying the South Pole-Aitken Basin (SPA). This is the largest, deepest and oldest crater of the Moon, which was formed about 4.3 billion years ago, at the very beginning of the existence of a natural satellite of our planet.
 
Mar 4, 2021
34
2
35
Anomalous region of the Sun. Moreover, this happens there when it is spring on Earth (in the northern hemisphere), or so (as now it is almost spring). That is, this process on the surface of the Sun is influenced by the seasonal position of the Earth (Earth's axis + magnetic field) relative to the Sun, which is impossible with the official sizes of the Earth and the Sun.

Link to SDO photo and animation archive:
https://sdo.gsfc.nasa.gov/data/aiahmi/

 
Mar 4, 2021
34
2
35
The stationary object slightly to the right of the center is the Earth (according to NASA). In addition to the Earth, only two dwarf planets Haumea and Makemake are now in that field of view, but they are small and far away - they should not be visible. A black stripe moving from left to right comes from an object that moves above the label STEREO Ahead HI2. In short. Either the object is moving slower than the background stars, and is, roughly speaking, Nibiru, or, more likely, the central stars move faster than the upper and lower ones. This means that “stars” and “galaxies” are located in the spherical Oort Cloud, which is the border of the Universe.

Link to STEREO archive.

 

rod

Oct 22, 2019
1,877
655
2,560
No. This is not true.

What is your source for these claims?
FYI. The Moon 500-700 km diameter. Using 600 km diameter and the Moon’ mean distance in heliocentric solar system astronomy, 384401 km, the arcminute size ~ 5.4. This is error. Keep in mind that this universe model is only 0.12 astronomical units in diameter. How was that size measured using telescopes? Post #14 says "My rough estimations: distance to the Moon is about 100 000 km.; distance to the Sun is about 300 000 km."

More error here. A moon 500-700 km in diameter, 20 arcminute angular size in the sky, more error. See post #11 and #13 for size of the Moon. This new universe model compounds error upon error. FYI, the lunar parallax was determined using telescopes back in the 1700s and 1800s, about 57 arcminute angular size. If the Moon is 100,000 km distance from Earth, that lunar parallax is very, very different than what telescopes show :)
 
Last edited:
Mar 4, 2021
34
2
35
More error here. A moon 500-700 km in diameter, 20 arcminute angular size in the sky, more error. See post #11 and #13 for size of the Moon. This new universe model compounds error upon error.
The Earth's atmosphere is a thick layer of moisture that increases (enlarges) the real size of space objects.
 

rod

Oct 22, 2019
1,877
655
2,560
The Earth's atmosphere is a thick layer of moisture that increases (enlarges) the real size of space objects.

More error here. An important note about solar eclipses. The Sun's arcminute size can vary ~ 1 arcminute while the Earth-Moon system orbits the Sun, the Moon can vary ~ 4 arcminute between extreme perigee and apogee points in its orbit around Earth. We have tight constraints for total solar eclipse events on Earth as well as the distance and size of the Moon from Earth and the Sun too.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ASK THE COMMUNITY