Pastry-Baked Heresy: A Manifesto

Apr 11, 2025
27
3
35
Pastry-Baked Heresy: A Manifesto
by Those Who Refuse to Pretend the Donut Is a Sphere

We begin with a truth so soft, so obvious, that it slips through the fingers of high theory:
Black holes are not points. They are pastries.
Not perfect ones. Not symmetrical.
They bulge, they burn unevenly, they lean like exhausted dancers collapsing under the weight of angular momentum and curved desire.
We were told to speak in tensors.
We were told to calculate our reverence.
We were told that singularities are where knowledge stops and the divine begins.
But we looked at the ngEHT and said:
That’s a donut.
And worse:
That’s an asymmetrical donut.
We reject your tidy infinities.
We reject your sacred points.
We reject the assumption that elegance is truth.
Instead, we believe in:
Topological turbulence
Gravitational glaze
The quiet honesty of uneven collapse
And the hole — the real, visible hole — that everyone pretends not to see
This is not satire.
This is clarity through confection.
We don’t simplify.
We sharpen.
We coat the raw edge of revelation in metaphor, not to sweeten it, but to make it palatable.
Because the universe is not here to be clean. It is here to be real.
Let it be known:
We will speak in pastry when math turns dogmatic.
We will draw curves where others demand points.
We will laugh in the halls of orthodoxy and point to the data when they call us fools.
You may silence the questioners.
But you will never unbake the donut.
We are the pastry heretics.
And the curvature is on our side.
🥐☕🍩

Standard Einstein Field Equation: (unbaked)
R_{mu nu} - (1/2) R g_{mu nu} + Lambda g_{mu nu} = (8piG / c^4) T_{mu
nu}

Corrected Equation (Pastry-Adjusted):
R_{mu nu} - (1/2) R g_{mu nu} + Lambda g_{mu nu} + D_{mu nu} = (8piG /
c^4) T_{mu nu}

Where:
D_{mu nu} represents the Donut Tensor -
a topological curvature term accounting for asymmetrical toroidal geometry observed in high-resolution black hole imaging.

Note:
This correction is heretical, delicious, and not yet peer-reviewed.
But the glaze of truth is unmistakable.

In the Lexicon of Pastry-Baked Heresy:

Donut Tensor (D<sub>μν</sub>)
A corrective term to Einstein’s field equations accounting for observable asymmetries in gravitational topology.
Predicted by those who stared into the ngEHT and saw pastry instead of perfection.
Units: curvature per bite
Behavior: grows unstable under spherical assumptions.

Gravitational Glaze
The shimmering ring of lensed light around a black hole. Once thought poetic — now recognized as sugar coating for the void.
Forms unevenly under angular rotation and observational heresy.
Also known as: photon icing, the toroidal shimmer, or God’s finger print in melted sugar.

Sprinkles
Local quantum deviations from expected geometry.
Commonly dismissed as “instrument noise,” but actually the cosmic equivalent of sarcasm.
Function: Decorative. Disruptive. Possibly intentional.
Cannot be predicted, only savored.

Crumb Horizon
The region just beyond observational certainty, where symmetry crumbles under scrutiny.
Past this point, spacetime is best understood in terms of flaky uncertainty and partial truths.
Notable behavior: causes general relativity to leak filling.

The Heresy Constant (h̶)
A forbidden fudge factor. Applied whenever a traditionalist says, “But that violates the standard model.”
Use case: To nudge equations gently toward what’s actually observable.
Appears in baked formulations of GR, QM, and public outreach.

Bite-Sized Topology
A method of visualizing high-dimensional geometries using only baked goods.
Examples include:
Croissant curvature (folded inflation)
Danish lensing (circular occlusion with unexpected filling)
Jelly singularities (internal density spikes hidden by flavor symmetry)

Pastry Horizon
The observable boundary of delicious deformation.
A transitional shell beyond which spacetime becomes edible only in metaphor.
Crossing this threshold often results in conceptual delight or academic indigestion.

Einstein-Ring-Filled
Describes a black hole visual structure so lensed and rotationally bent it mimics a filled donut.
Also known as: "The Jelly Torus,” or "Rosen's Regret."

Pastry-Baked Heresy
The overarching movement to reframe complex cosmological models with metaphor so irreverent it circles back to brilliance.
Born of frustration. Fueled by laughter.
Credo: We didn’t break physics. We just made it taste better.

Kruller's Collapse
A catastrophic failure of spherical symmetry under excessive rotation.
Named after the misunderstood cousin of Kerr, who saw a spinning donut and believed.
Effect: Folds the hole into a hybrid state of drizzle and regret.

The Bismarck Boundary
The exact location where core density becomes indistinguishable from filling.
Beyond this boundary, mass is no longer evenly distributed — it’s jammed.

Event Fondant
The thin, sticky layer separating the known from the unknowable.
Not technically measurable, but always there — like a conspiracy of texture.
Warning: Tastes like math. Chews like faith.

Cinnamon Swirl Singularity
A hypothetical structure in which rotational entropy organizes into an edible spiral.
Believers say: You can still detect gravitational waves through the glaze.

Topoglaze
A compound descriptor for irregular surface features within the glaze of spacetime.
Used in post-Einsteinian toroidal modeling where smoothness is an illusion.
Symbol: τ<sub>sweet</sub>

Einstein’s Rolling Pin
A metaphorical instrument said to have smoothed the wrinkles of spacetime,
but left stretch marks where the curvature resisted.
Now repurposed: For flattening flat-earthers and doughy metrics alike.

The Eclair Horizon
A theoretical construct where mass-energy compresses flavor into light.
May explain flare emissions in active galactic nuclei.
Proposed behavior: Asymmetrical leaks of custard jets.

Butterfield Equilibrium
A fragile balance between laminar rotational flow and structural flakiness.
Breaks down in the presence of gravity, time, or excessive hubris.

Puff Metrics
A non-Euclidean coordinate system derived from croissant expansion dynamics.
Too buttery for traditional calculus.
Primary use: Misleading cosmologists into joy.

Whisk Tensor (W<sub>μν</sub>)
Describes chaotic mixing of boundary conditions in pre-inflationary cosmology.
Often ignored due to its messiness and tendency to cause splatter effects at quantum scales.

Jam Pressure
The sticky force that arises when matter is compressed past observational honesty.
Common in early universe simulations and philosophical conversations.

The Cosmic Cruller
The unified model.
The dream.
A spinning, hollow, infinite-layered structure of entropy and emergence.
Believed by some to contain all other pastries within its twisted core.

The Eclairion

Heretic of the Crumb Horizon
Architect of Asymmetrical Donuts
Pastry Prophet of the ngEHT Shadows
Galactic geek of eclairic proportions



Article IV, Section 3 — The Glazed Confession Clause
If, at any point, the Heretic finds themselves breathless, weeping with laughter, or doubting their ability to return to standard cosmological vocabulary,
they are to be reminded:
“The manifesto was never meant to be survived.
It was meant to be digested.”

Footnote 7
“Should the Heretic feel too much joy, they must remember:
This joy is not a sin.
It is a sign they have reached the edge of the Crumb Horizon and glimpsed the frosted core of truth.”
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: stanwaterman

marcin

You're a madman I've come to the right place, then
Jul 18, 2024
111
17
85
Note:
This correction is heretical, delicious, and not yet peer-reviewed.
But the glaze of truth is unmistakable.
Remembering that D_μν tensor is 4x4 matrix, what are the true and unmistakable values of its elements for a donut?
 
Apr 11, 2025
27
3
35
Remembering that D_μν tensor is 4x4 matrix, what are the true and unmistakable values of its elements for a donut?
Ah yes — the D<sub>μν</sub> Tensor.
Rarely invoked, rarely survived.


It is a 4×4 matrix, of course —
but unlike standard stress-energy formulations, D<sub>μν</sub> is not merely numeric.
It encodes deformation, flavor asymmetry, and glaze distribution over spacetime curvature.


Now, for a canonical asymmetrical donut under relativistic spin, a simplified interpretation yields:




D_μν =
[ τ 0 0 δ ]
[ 0 ρ(r) 0 0 ]
[ 0 0 -τ 0 ]
[ δ 0 0 ϕ(θ) ]


Where:


  • τ (tau) represents toroidal tension, the topological cost of deviation from spherical expectation.
  • ρ(r) is radial glaze density, variable with internal curvature.
  • ϕ(θ) is the frosting anisotropy term, typically peaked along angular discontinuities.
  • δ is the deviation parameter, a complex-valued cross-term associated with asymmetry-driven collapse elegance.

Note: All components are understood in pastry-coherent units (PCUs), normalized against a reference cruller.


Philosophical Note:​

The Donut Tensor does not predict behavior.
It reveals betrayal
the betrayal of symmetry, of neatness, of assumptions baked too early.


So yes. D<sub>μν</sub> has values.
But to truly understand them,
one must first abandon the notion that flavor is isotropic.
 

marcin

You're a madman I've come to the right place, then
Jul 18, 2024
111
17
85
Do you also know the values of tensor elements for a sphere for comparison?
 

marcin

You're a madman I've come to the right place, then
Jul 18, 2024
111
17
85
Pastry-Baked Heresy: A Manifesto
by Those Who Refuse to Pretend the Donut Is a Sphere
See Definition: Donut Tensor
Behavior: grows unstable under spherical assumptions.
What is assumed to be spherical by those who pretend that the donut is a sphere?
 

marcin

You're a madman I've come to the right place, then
Jul 18, 2024
111
17
85
D_μν =
[ τ 0 0 δ ]
[ 0 ρ(r) 0 0 ]
[ 0 0 -τ 0 ]
[ δ 0 0 ϕ(θ) ]

Where:
  • τ (tau) represents toroidal tension, the topological cost of deviation from spherical expectation.
  • ρ(r) is radial glaze density, variable with internal curvature.
  • ϕ(θ) is the frosting anisotropy term, typically peaked along angular discontinuities.
  • δ is the deviation parameter, a complex-valued cross-term associated with asymmetry-driven collapse elegance.

Note: All components are understood in pastry-coherent units (PCUs), normalized against a reference cruller.
Is it in toroidal or spherical coordinates?
 
A torus, a toroid, is created with the repeated rotations of a closed helix. We have found a debris torus for every planet. (hula hoop) Formed by the repeated orbits. Planetary orbits are not ellipses. They are a one turn closed helix. A helix with one turn per orbit. This repeated corralling motion gathers planetary debris in a hula hoop like shape around the sun. For every planet.

This principle appears to apply to our MW center. A toroidal star. And when fed, expresses huge galactic bubbles. From the center acceleration of that star.

Inverted Faraday induction. With matter.
 

marcin

You're a madman I've come to the right place, then
Jul 18, 2024
111
17
85
@Classical Motion do you think that you answered my question about the coordinate system used in D_μν tensor by @Astraeus?

Are you saying that Kepler and Newton got it all wrong in the non-relativistic approximation?
From the laws of motion and the law of universal gravitation, Newton was able to derive Kepler's laws, which are specific to orbital motion in astronomy. Since Kepler's laws were well-supported by observation data, this consistency provided strong support of the validity of Newton's generalized theory, and unified celestial and ordinary mechanics. These laws of motion formed the basis of modern celestial mechanics until Albert Einstein introduced the concepts of special and general relativity in the early 20th century. For most applications, Keplerian motion approximates the motions of planets and satellites to relatively high degrees of accuracy and is used extensively in astronomy and astrodynamics.

A torus, a toroid, is created with the repeated rotations of a closed helix.
Can you show it in a picture or animation?
 
Imagine the sun’s rotational plane as a thin line across a sheet of paper. The paper is perpendicular to the plane. Now imagine a clock face on the paper. The sun is to the left, and the sun’s plane goes thru 9 and 3 o’clock. And the center of the clock.

This clock only has one hand, the minute hand. The center of the clock is 93 million miles from the sun. The radius of the minute hand is 1.5 million miles.

The earth is at the tip of the minute(month hand) hand. As the earth and paper orbit the sun, the earth rotates around that clock face. One revolution of clock …. per… one revolution of orbit. Half is above the plane and half is below the plane. With a curved acceleration in and a curved acceleration out.

A rotation within a rotation. An acceleration within an acceleration.

Planetary orbits are much different from what you have been taught. This is a true gravity orbit, not a man-made orbit. Planetary orbits are loss free, and do not need corrections.

They are self stabilizing. And last a long time on their own.

And obviously, we do not know gravity’s true vectors. This is a total different acceleration dynamic. Our orbits only use a part of gravity, not the whole thing.

This is just my personal conjecture. I haven’t heard any others with it. I suppose it from looking at Io’s debris field images, in which I can no longer find.

They clearly showed this helical trajectory. But no one talks about it. Or try to explain it as a gravity anomaly. And I can find Saturn’s ring images also. Showing the helices of those ringlets.

It was very clear to me. But if it doesn’t follow spacetime theory, it is ignored.

Today information is heavily filtered. But no one seems to mind.
 

marcin

You're a madman I've come to the right place, then
Jul 18, 2024
111
17
85
@Classical Motion Let me summarize: You didn't answer my question about the coordinate system used in D_μν tensor by @Astraeus, you think that Kepler and Newton got it all wrong in the non-relativistic approximation, and you can't show your torus creation by the rotation of a closed helix in a picture or animation. Double congrats on your choice of your username.
 
I do not use that map to discern this territory. Classical physics was killed before it was completed. So I went back and completed it for myself. I don't see where this cosmos uses math or information. So I don't either. This cosmos is strictly mechanical. Probability, randomness and chaos does not exist. And space is empty. Cubed and squared.

Our intellect keeps us blind.

I am not a scientist or an expert. And have no authority.
 
Apr 11, 2025
27
3
35
"But the glaze of truth is unmistakable."
Absolutely brilliant!
There was a moment.

The theory had been circling around it — curved motion, bounded structure, the rejection of singularities — but suddenly it snapped into focus. Not as an equation, but as a shape.

An asymmetrical donut.

UMT had been pointing there all along. Bounded curved motion doesn’t collapse inward — it wraps. It folds into itself without vanishing. And as we worked through the math, it became clear: the toroidal structure wasn’t just a metaphor. It was required. It sits directly in UMT’s falsifiability table — the theory lives or dies on whether these shapes can be seen.

Then I looked again at the ngEHT imagery — those fuzzy rings, the gravitational contours — and I knew.

Black holes aren’t points. They’re donuts.

And when I typed that, everything shifted. What had been dense and abstract suddenly became sweet, ridiculous, and absolutely true. I turned to ChatGPT and said, “Let’s go. Run with it.”

It did. Literary pastry metaphors poured in. Glazed singularities. Gravitational icing. I was laughing so hard.

And underneath the joy — was clarity.
 
Jan 2, 2024
1,022
168
1,360
Amazing. The ultimate in analogy. Welcome.:tearsofjoy:

PS, depending on how you treat Time, orbits are doughnuts (donuts), and again (extending time) we get spring tubes (pasta straws). You have proved the universe is a dog's dinner.
 

marcin

You're a madman I've come to the right place, then
Jul 18, 2024
111
17
85
Amazing. The ultimate in analogy. Welcome.:tearsofjoy:

PS, depending on how you treat Time, orbits are doughnuts (donuts), and again (extending time) we get spring tubes (pasta straws). You have proved the universe is a dog's dinner.
I think that's on topic, it's yours and it's serious:
I'm afraid, that @Astraeus didn't help you make it more credible. I've had no positive or negative sentiment for this theory, but now I have diabetes.
 
Last edited:

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts