Pattern Searching

Status
Not open for further replies.
B

bdaunno

Guest
What is that pseudoscience called where people search for patterns where they do not exist? (Like in pi or in static frequenecies, etc.)
 
H

HopDavid

Guest
bdaunno":5tzt0qt2 said:
What is that pseudoscience called where people search for patterns where they do not exist? (Like in pi or in static frequenecies, etc.)

I wouldn't call that a branch of psuedo science. Finding patterns that aren't there is something everyone does whether consciously or not. Pareidolia is one word I've heard for it.

An example of Pareidolia:
unexplainedface.jpg

from this Forgetomori page.

At what point do you call this tendency to find patterns naive superstition and when is it legit? Many bodies of evidence are like Rorschach inkblots that even well trained observers can misinterpret. Every human's perception is colored by his preconceived notions.
 
B

BoJangles2

Guest
An area of maths your touching on is called, curve matching, pattern matching, over optimisation, data fitting, it even touches on statistical significance.

Basically you can take any complex set of data and find patterns in it, but 99.999999% of the time they have absolutely no relevance. This is a common problem with newbie’s to financial markets; they will take 20 years of data, and mine it for patterns. IE a newcomer may ask, what is the best day of the week to go long (as a silly example)? And so they crunch their 20 years of data and work out Monday is the best day to go long. However, when they start trading this strategy they can’t work out why they are always loosing.

The reason lies in the fact, that all they have done is over optimised a set of random data, sure in 20 years Monday was the best day to go long, but if you looked at 40 years Tuesday was the best, and over a 100 years Wednesday was the best.

There are many examples of how this can work with or without financial data. Another “loose” example would be someone who looks for apparitions. The image being complex data, the face in the image being over optimisation. For if the pictures was taken at a different time of day, different angle, or even with a different camera, there would not be a face, or another (different face) may appear. It’s also easy to see there are sociological effects going on in my last example, but the theory is still the same.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.