Scientists found one of the largest carbon-based space molecules ever. Here's why that's a big deal

[Admin]

Scientists have identified one of the largest carbon-based molecules in space yet. It could help us decode the origins of life as we know it.

Scientists found one of the largest carbon-based space molecules ever. Here's why that's a big deal : Read more

 

[Classical Motion]

What is the molecule’s velocity? It’s important to start measuring the velocities of any molecules in space. Velocity seems to nullify EM and G forces for isolated charge in the solar wind. We need to compare velocities of these molecules, if possible.

 

[Torbjorn Larsson]

Carbon based compounds, "organics", production is ubiquitous in the universe, starting with carbon stars atmospheres and on. As long carbon (and the rest of the so called CHNOPS compounds) is supplied to habitable environments, evolution will presumably do the rest as it did on Earth.

What is the molecule’s velocity? It’s important to start measuring the velocities of any molecules in space. Velocity seems to nullify EM and G forces for isolated charge in the solar wind.

What does it matter for transport, after the molecule formed? The PAHs are often formed in cold molecular clouds, the clouds that can form stars, so they don't move fast within the clouds. At a few K, most molecules would move ~100 m/s. The clouds typically move with a few km/s in relation to the typical 200 km/s orbital speed of the Milky Way disk. [ https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/earth-and-planetary-sciences/molecular-clouds ]

The solar wind does not come into it, but the protons that constitute most of it has typical velocity ranges of 250 - 750 km/s. The escape velocity for Sun is ~ 600 km/s, so some solar wind is not "nullified" but will escape to interstellar space.

 

[Classical Motion]

I think my comments about particles has been misunderstood. I think that Sol’s particle atmosphere and Sol’s solar wind are two different dynamics. And two different configurations.

I think the atmosphere has a particle density gradient. Two things about this gradient. It’s a lot less dense than the surface. This allows higher velocities to be had, before collision. Or before field interactions. So, even though the atmosphere is rare, it’s a lot hotter than the surface. And also the atmosphere has an angular spacial density.

By some unknown stimulus, a portion of this atmosphere escapes and is constantly accelerated out beyond Neptune. No one has come up with a reason for this acceleration. No one knows where this acceleration ends. 99% of the wind is raw charge, 50/50 charge. This is an actual mass loss for all stars. Not just light loss. These charges appear to be inert. They are in close proximity to opposite charges and do not attack or repel. And they have mass, but are accelerated away from Sol for months.

These are NOT just the high speed particles. These are under a constant increasing force.

And apparently inert to EM and G. I am referring to the wind, not ejections. It would be interesting to see what a gamma shine would do to them. But raw charge wouldn’t emit light, only x-ray and gamma.

Being that raw charge has net charge, and a magnetic dipole, I would assume the acceleration is electrical. In some fashion. But for neutral matter, like molecules, I would assume that the only acceleration force would be gravity. And have much slower velocities.

Super novas are said to explain high velocity matter, and high atomic number mass. I doubt this. Today we have many instruments 24/7 and responsive, and have only proven that super novas are very rare. Cosmic rays, high speed nuclei, are all over the place. And if other bodies have the same percentages of heavy atoms like earth, it wouldn’t account for them.

And if this wind would ever get slowed down, the formation of H1(dipoles) would emit some EM and we should detect it. A glow of some kind.

And that’s why I think that atomic clouds or molecular clouds should be much slower than the wind. And can be interacted with. Speed and angle determine interaction time, and interaction requires some time.

If the fast charge remains at velocity and inert, then there is a lot less mass and gravity in the cosmos than there used to be. The cosmos is dissolving. Quantum dissolving.

The density of fast charge, thru-out the cosmos, would be very difficult to detect and measure. Our detectors and concepts are for gas molecules. The star wind is quantum molecules.

We might have a quantum shield around our system. We might need it.

But I’m no expert and just spitball.