Secret NASA Transmissions

[recon]

Just been reading the other thread on this topic, but couldnt reply for some reason.<br /><br />Anyone who thinks that the "Teather" footage is particles are clearly out of there mind!!! you can clearly see that there are objects going BEHIND the teather! and that's a FACT!<br />If the "Teather" is 80miles away from the shuttle, and the "Teather" is 12miles long, then the objects that clearly go behind the "Teather" are at least 2miles wide and could be as big as 5miles wide.<br />They are clearly under intelligent control, they move out of the way for each other, change direction and even make complete U-Turns.<br /><br />I am sceptic of a lot of the UFO things you see and hear, but i'm not stupid, there is no doubt that this footage shows that there is something/someone watching our space exploarations!<br /><br />Any Scientist who says that it is particles, will be jokes to future generations!!!

 

[rhodan]

O boy...shuttle_guy starts chatting with himself...better move this to Phenomena!

 

[beartooth]

There really should be a warning displayed when clicking on this part of SDC.

 

[recon]

That's right, when you don't have answers get personal!!! <br /><br />Nobody i've spoken too are saying that they are particles, they know that there is no way in hell they are particles, it's a complete joke to say that they are! everbody who is studying this footage knows we are way past the particle excuse, because we all know that they clearly go behind the Teather. <br /><br />WOW 2 to 5 mile wide particles!!!!<br />

 

[recon]

So tell me shuttle guy, do they go behind the Teather?

 

[lowendfreq]

Like what - independant opinions should not be expressed on this board?<br /><br />Remember another site is just a click away..

 

[recon]

Yeah i have no doubt that the object in the picture on the website you linked is in front of the teather, but this one goes behind the teather no probelm at all!

 

[MBA_UIU]

I love people who think they can take a picture and ID everything in it. Most professionals that do this for a living spend years in school learning the trade. It's nice to see that the average Joe can do the same thing with no training at all. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><strong><font color="#0000ff"><br /><br /> <br /><img id="268587ce-7170-4b41-a87b-8cd443f9351a" src="http://sitelife.space.com/ver1.0/Content/images/store/6/8/268587ce-7170-4b41-a87b-8cd443f9351a.Large.jpg" alt="blog post photo" /><br /></font></strong></p> </div>

 

[recon]

Thank's for that friendly reply!!! <br /><br />But instead of attacking me personaly debate the subject of the topic! why dont you tell me what it is that goes BEHIND the teather?<br /><br />And what training do you need to see that this object goes behind the teather? a twelve year old child could tell me that it is not a particle, and that it goes behind the teather.<br /><br /><br /><br />

 

[petepan]

from the web site that CS provided....<br /><br />"There are several reasons why this just isn't so, however. Chief amongst them is the necessary size of the objects. IF they do indeed pass behind the tether at the specified distance, it would mean that the objects were MILES in diameter. As such, they would have to have been visible from the ground even in broad daylight. The fact that there were no reports of gigantic disks seen above the atmosphere from anywhere on the globe that day tends to lend credence to the theory that the giants simply weren't there at all."<br /><br /><br /><br />So, where are your reports of MILES wide objects in the sky?<br />Please explain.<br /><br />

 

[MBA_UIU]

<blockquote><font class="small">In reply to:</font><hr /><p><font color="yellow">(W)hy dont you tell me what it is that goes BEHIND the teather?</font>p><hr /></p></blockquote><br /><br />I hope you do not mean in the picture you posted on here?!?! Be freaking real. No one, at least no one in their "right" frame of mind, would even try to define any object in that picture unless they were there when the picture was taken. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><strong><font color="#0000ff"><br /><br /> <br /><img id="268587ce-7170-4b41-a87b-8cd443f9351a" src="http://sitelife.space.com/ver1.0/Content/images/store/6/8/268587ce-7170-4b41-a87b-8cd443f9351a.Large.jpg" alt="blog post photo" /><br /></font></strong></p> </div>

 

[recon]

"I hope you do not mean in the picture you posted on here?!?! Be freaking real. No one, at least no one in their "right" frame of mind, would even try to define any object in that picture unless they were there when the picture was taken."<br /><br />Thank you your spot on and i agree with you! so how can people on here say they are particles? i'm not saying what they are, only that they are there and they go behind the teather! <br />

 

[recon]

"There are several reasons why this just isn't so, however. Chief amongst them is the necessary size of the objects. IF they do indeed pass behind the tether at the specified distance, it would mean that the objects were MILES in diameter. As such, they would have to have been visible from the ground even in broad daylight. The fact that there were no reports of gigantic disks seen above the atmosphere from anywhere on the globe that day tends to lend credence to the theory that the giants simply weren't there at all."<br /><br />Sorry but i've been laughing at that so much! it's the worst excuse i've heard!!! you cant be serious right? if somebody HAD filmed them from earth, then you would be saying "ooo that's venus, or ooo your crazy little green men", you cant win with you debunkers it will never be good enough. It's the worst science ever your saying that because nobody had seen them from earth hundreds of miles away that the footage taken at a distance of 80 miles with the Astronauts and ground control commenting on the objects, that really the objects weren't there!!!! oh my god! <br /><br />What about the footage of the Astronauts doing the space work and one of them says to the other, "Mark would you take a look out there, there's an object right in front of you!" and the other guys response? "i dont know what your talking about" WHAT DO YOU MEEN I DONT KNOW WHAT YOUR TALKING ABOUT!!!!! and the ground control comes in and says "we are giving you an order to stay vecter" wich means shut up and stop talking because we have a room full of the press here watching and listening to you, ánd then you see the object go slowly past them. <br /><br />I know i will not get a respectful answer to this, so this is my last post. It's a shame because i really wanted to learn and understand, and seriously debate the material of The Secret Nasa Transmissions with people who i have a lot of respect for who work in the space business.<br />I'm not a tree hugging hippie who believes

 

[petepan]

Again from the site CS linked to....<br /><br />"<b>Andy Ellis, of Yorkshire UFO Info</b>, had provided us with some very interesting still frames from the STS-75 video footage. We will let him take over from here. <i>emphasis added</i><br /><br /> <br /><br />Many things have been said of the STS 75 Tether footage, and the main point has been how these "things" pass behind the tether.......well I am not going to spend a lot of time talking about the footage, as I feel these few pics will speak for themselves. "<br /><br /><br />So a guy who actually studies UFO phenomena says that they are NOT UFO's, interesting.<br /><br /><br /><br /><font color="yellow">....with the Astronauts and ground control commenting on the objects,...</font><br /><br />Do you have links for this?<br /><br />BTW, What about all the other amateur and professional astronomers around the world, are they part of the conspiracy to cover it up? <br /><br /><font color="yellow">...because we have a room full of the press here watching and listening to you, ánd then you see the object go slowly past them....</font><br /><br />So a room full of press made no comment about it? Interesting.<br /><br /><font color="yellow">...but because as a neutral i know that there is something to the subject of UFO'S, that they really do exist. </font><br /><br />If you were truely neutral on the matter you would be saying you don't know they really exist. You have already made up your mind.<br /><br />Where did you acquire the pic you posted? <br /><br />So, where are the reports of MILES wide objects being seen?<br /><br /><font color="yellow">...my only question is how will you people deal with it when it does...</font><br /><br />How will 'we' deal with it? <br />Personally it will be the greatest day in history, so long as they are peaceful <img src="/images/icons/wink.gif" /> , then i'll be off to work like any other day...

 

[recon]

Maybe people should watch the tape to really understand, but there is a second phenomena on the recordings, something that is very hard to see because it is so fast, it has been explaned away by debunkers as cosmic rays.<br /><br />Some of the critics/debunkers/sceptics who have seen the video have responded to the 'Second Space Phenomena' has described by Martyn Stubbs have come up with 'Cosmic Rays' having been responsible for the images on the video. Well this was refuted by several leading researchers but endorsed by Mr Oberg and Ms Williams. Thanks to an alert enthusiast working around CCD technology he was able to get a response from the manufacturer of theses electronic sensors. Their reaction to the claims that 'Cosmic Rays' are the culprits will make interesting reading.<br /> <br /> <br />SECRET NASA TRANSMISSIONS - UPDATE <br /> <br />Space Phenomena Two "cannot be attributed to a CCD being affected by 'cosmic rays' or anything else." <br /> <br />During our filmed interview with Martyn Stubbs, the former Cable TV station manager who for a period of some five years recorded over 2,500 hours of space shuttle footage from NASA's own downlink, he makes it clear that while the 'First Space Phenomena' (anomalous spheres, such as those seen in and around STS-75, STS-48, STS-80 and STS-84) are "absolutely unimpeachable, in a preponderance sense", it is the 'Second Space Phenomena' that "intrigues me much more". <br /> <br />On 27 April 2000, America's FOX TV included a brief segment from the controversial STS-75 'Tether' sequence in a nationwide broadcast titled The Best Evidence Ever (Caught on Tape) #2. The footage, supplied by a one-time colleague of Martyn Stubbs, David Sereda, was among a couple of dozen or so UFO clips hastily assembled by the producers. <br /> <br />The programme, while serving to heighten interest in the STS-75 sequence, failed to make so much as a passing reference to the 'Second Space Phenomena'. <br /> <br />And while sceptics and debunkers

 

[recon]

Are the debunkers lost for words????? maybe you should watch the footage before commenting, believe me, the second space phenomena will, "Blow your minds."

 

[petepan]

Can you supply a link please?

 

[tomnackid]

what are you people talking about? what the hell is a "teather"???????

 

[chew_on_this]

If you don't have something to contribute to the discussion, shut your piehole. I think most everyone but your sycophantic heros is sick of your "psych rounds" epithet. It's a blatant abuse of the terms of service. Get over yourself.

 

[rubicondsrv]

<font color="yellow">If you don't have something to contribute to the discussion, shut your piehole. I think most everyone but your sycophantic heros is sick of your "psych rounds" epithet. It's a blatant abuse of the terms of service. Get over yourself.</font><br /><br />Actualy I find the psych rounds coment amusing. it is as amusing in this thread as it was in Bigbrain's threads. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> </div>

 

[chew_on_this]

I'm not saying most aren't loony, but when I see a new post, I'm hoping for more insanity relating to the topic. I hate wasting my time on troll posts.

 

[majkl]

Objects are only visible in ultraviolet spectra. Higher energy state.

 

[majkl]

Let us not forget the spectacular footage where these objects do some formation over africa and then the central one lights up. These objects appear on many different footages. I cannot find words to express how ridiculus it is, not to see that something strange is happening on this footages if authentic. I mean you really have to be blind not to see that these objects are doing something other than randomly fly around.

 

[qso1]

Recon:<br />and that's a FACT! <br />If the "Teather" is 80miles away from the shuttle, and the "Teather" is 12miles long, then the objects that clearly go behind the "Teather" are at least 2miles wide and could be as big as 5miles wide.<br /><br />Me:<br />Can you explain why an object 2 to 5 miles wide was not reported by anyone on Earth? Millions below the shuttles flight path in populated areas would have seen it. In fact, millions more many miles in either direction to the side of the flight path would have seen this UFO. Yet I do not recall a single report on CNN or other outlets that would have covered something that obviously visible.<br /><br />As many as half a billion people world wide should have seen it. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><strong>My borrowed quote for the time being:</strong></p><p><em>There are three kinds of people in life. Those who make it happen, those who watch it happen...and those who do not know what happened.</em></p> </div>

 

[tomnackid]

Does anyone know what "blooming" on a video image is? If not I suggest you look it up before doing any amateur image analysis!