Space roar: NASA detected the loudest sound in the universe, but what is it?

Aug 6, 2020
2
2
10
Ah, space hype. Accuracy gives way to click bait. 23 miles is hardly "outer space" by any definition, and radio waves are hardly "sound" by any definition. But it makes for good click bait. Right up there with "God Particle" for the Higgs and "Theory of Everything" for the UFT. Well done.
 
Aug 6, 2020
1
0
10
The answer is easy. Do ALL of the above. You have an instrument ready to go again. Use it! Develop new ones. Why be limited? Put an entrepreneur in charge. We get stuff done!
 
Nov 18, 2019
9
0
10
In the article, there is an interesting fact that "distant light becomes radio waves as it loses energy over distance" which tells us that interstellar vacuum space is not empty but filled up with a medium to absorb the lost energy from the light. This medium is called aether - a fluid medium for propagating light and other electromagnetic waves, which fills up the entire visible space around us. This is another evidence of the existence of aether. Just as the speed of sound is isotropic only relative to local air, the speed of light is isotropic only relative to local aether. Thus, the existence of aether as an evidence to disproves Einstein's special relativity is as strong as the evidence to disprove special relativity: the universally synchronized time shown by all the atomic clocks on the GPS satellites is absolute, not relative as claimed by special relativity which tells us that clocks can never be synchronized relative to more than one inertial reference frame no matter how you correct them. For more details disproving special relativity, please see https://www.researchgate.net/publication/297527784_Challenge_to_the_Special_Theory_of_Relativity

The disproof of special relativity and the restore of the absolute time and the 3D space directly deny the Big Bang theory, and thus, all efforts based on these wrong theories are waste of money and time.
 
Mar 27, 2020
18
2
15
In the article, there is an interesting fact that "distant light becomes radio waves as it loses energy over distance" which tells us that interstellar vacuum space is not empty but filled up with a medium to absorb the lost energy from the light. This medium is called aether - a fluid medium for propagating light and other electromagnetic waves, which fills up the entire visible space around us. This is another evidence of the existence of aether. Just as the speed of sound is isotropic only relative to local air, the speed of light is isotropic only relative to local aether. Thus, the existence of aether as an evidence to disproves Einstein's special relativity is as strong as the evidence to disprove special relativity: the universally synchronized time shown by all the atomic clocks on the GPS satellites is absolute, not relative as claimed by special relativity which tells us that clocks can never be synchronized relative to more than one inertial reference frame no matter how you correct them. For more details disproving special relativity, please see https://www.researchgate.net/publication/297527784_Challenge_to_the_Special_Theory_of_Relativity

The disproof of special relativity and the restore of the absolute time and the 3D space directly deny the Big Bang theory, and thus, all efforts based on these wrong theories are waste of money and time.
How does this deny the Big Bang Theory?
 
Nov 18, 2019
9
0
10
Please cite a source that says "time is absolute." Thanks. (haven't heard that before)
and
 
Jan 4, 2020
204
73
160
This is a decade old data that has been cited 18 times, but not by the large data integrations such as Planck 2018 or BOSS 2020. It isn't hindering cosmic background spectra analysis since the ARCADE frequency bands of 3-90 GHz [ https://asd.gsfc.nasa.gov/archive/arcade/pubs/arc2_apj_interp_2011.pdf ] mostly overlap the Planck data of 30 - 857 GHz [ https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/pdf/forth/aa33880-18.pdf ].

If you look at the data calibration of the lower frequency bands in Planck they are complicated by "polarized foregrounds". Much of the ARCADE survey region [ https://www.nasa.gov/centers/goddard/news/topstory/2009/arcade_balloon.html ] is meticulously masked away due to various sources including gas and dust emission [ https://arxiv.org/pdf/1907.12875.pdf ], while the ARCADE analysis [1st link] is extrapolated between models, data and frequencies in the same way that Planck did originally.
 
Jan 4, 2020
204
73
160
In the article, there is an interesting fact that "distant light becomes radio waves as it loses energy over distance" which tells us that interstellar vacuum space is not empty but filled up with a medium to absorb the lost energy from the light. This medium is called aether ...

The disproof of special relativity and the restore of the absolute time and the 3D space directly deny the Big Bang theory, ...
Your first claim is wrong, which you then take as a basis to introduce baseless pseudoscience and self promotion.

The reason cosmic background radiation light redshift into radio wavelengths is due to space expansion, a space expansion which indicates a big bang and is based on general relativity [ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_microwave_background ]. Relativistic cosmology explain all what we see on large scales and alternative physics were rejected a century ago by direct observation [ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_relativity#Origins_and_significance ].

The essay journal were you published your erroneous notions - a waste of time and money - is not indexed in the Journal Citation Reports and has no citation score. But some indexation places still has it and some has had it which history reveal what looks like a predatory, self citation driven journal [ https://www.scimagojr.com/journalsearch.php?q=29201&tip=sid&clean=0 ]. What readers of science sites expect - besides not being subjected to self interest spam - is peer reviewed published papers as references.
 

ASK THE COMMUNITY