Space-Time Continuum

Aug 14, 2020
713
126
2,060
It is assumed time runs what we humans experience, past > present > future, future meaning a Universe (U), and universes (u), yet to be and totally unknown even to "the Universe" (and, its other incarnation, "the Multiverse"). As if the Universe were a human without any sense whatsoever of, or control over, "its future." My sense is the Universe has far more sense and intrinsic, inherent, control of things than any human astronomer or physicist could ever believe:

Space-verse: "A World Without Time": Time = 0. Infinitely flat-smooth, infinite in extents (including depth as a dimensionless point).
Time-verse: A World Without Space: Space = 0. Infinite in set (Big Crunch Vortex) of constituent finites (infinity of grains....).
Space-Time Continuum: (Time-verse (s = 0)) Past (-t) > Future (t) > t=0 (Space-verse)
t = ((-t) (t)) = 0 || t = ((t) (-t)) = 0.

"t = 0", a cosmological constant.... and the Universe has control (never, ever, loses control), period.

Space-Time Continuum: [[Past > Future]] > 0.

Thus the finite of universe (u) has infinitely many beginnings and ends, infinitely many 'times', in-line and in parallel. Thus, the Planck level horizon, a.k.a. the Big Bang horizon, is a property of the Time-verse and no property of the Space-verse. Regarding the Space-Time Continuum, it is a cosmological constant of "horizon". Thus it has differing meanings and physicality to the Space-verse (no meaning or physicality whatsoever), the Time-verse (the physicist favorite meaning and physicality), and the Space-Time Continuum (as illusive as any illusive horizon that can never be approached much less reached).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: iwnt2kw
Aug 14, 2020
713
126
2,060
**I added on more explanation to the above opening.**

Exactly as I've said about light, time ("in-line" that is: regarding parallel universes it is an entirely different story) has no backend ever to find to travel into. "Past" eventuating to a cosmological constant of "0-point", by way of path "future", for universes (u) is single-sided 2-dimensional frame holography. "Past" (regarding in-line) is as physically uncertain as the "principle of uncertainty" in Quantum Mechanics. More so.... infinitely uncertain. Not a chance of positioning regarding it -- except as a matter of coordinate holography, Not a chance of having momentum toward it except as a matter of [[0-point being]] between coordinate points of and/or in an insubstantial hologram. All travel is pasts, via futures, ending in every point of the line in Space-Time Continuum 0-point.

The ultimate destination and destiny of "finite", "local", "relative", universe regarding 0-point being a blackhole.... whether a dimensionality of event horizon or, bigger and better yet, no event horizon at all (a dimensionless sink). The ultimate end of whatever that particular finite story of time is. To paraphrase a famous saying: All times' roads lead to 't = 0', beginning to end.... All those infinities of beginnings.... All those infinities of ends.
 
Jan 4, 2022
11
2
15
**I added on more explanation to the above opening.**

Exactly as I've said about light, time ("in-line" that is: regarding parallel universes it is an entirely different story) has no backend ever to find to travel into. "Past" eventuating to a cosmological constant of "0-point", by way of path "future", for universes (u) is single-sided 2-dimensional frame holography. "Past" (regarding in-line) is as physically uncertain as the "principle of uncertainty" in Quantum Mechanics. More so.... infinitely uncertain. Not a chance of positioning regarding it -- except as a matter of coordinate holography, Not a chance of having momentum toward it except as a matter of [[0-point being]] between coordinate points of and/or in an insubstantial hologram. All travel is pasts, via futures, ending in every point of the line in Space-Time Continuum 0-point.

The ultimate destination and destiny of "finite", "local", "relative", universe regarding 0-point being a blackhole.... whether a dimensionality of event horizon or, bigger and better yet, no event horizon at all (a dimensionless sink). The ultimate end of whatever that particular finite story of time is. To paraphrase a famous saying: All times' roads lead to 't = 0', beginning to end.... All those infinities of beginnings.... All those infinities of ends.
t=0 ...NO t => ends to 0 ..never becomes a zero .Time is continous flow of energy along side the space .like the Mobius band it never ends .. But the events rise and fall over it .Roll over ot with imprints ..that could be read .hence we search and research scrapping the floor of it .
 
Aug 14, 2020
713
126
2,060
(t = (+/-) '1') is the horizon of Origin, and (infinity = (+/-) '1') is the horizon of Infinity. It's the same multi-faceted, multi-dimensional, horizon, a superposition of [origin / infinity] being Big Mirror (Universe (U) (BC (M) | BV ((C) (C^2)) | BB (E))) mirroring within -- outside-in (inside-out) -- to infinities of overlapping island universes (u) (the infinities of exact duplicates effectively inlaying to one (due to something very like "Pauli's exclusion principle," if not it exactly) among the island infinities offset and overlapping).

Radius physic is '1/2'.

Now (t = '0'). Quantum entanglement, '0-point' (Hawking's "Grand Central Station" of 'all at once' with its particularly peculiar single-handed, single digited clock (Base '2' binary '0' and/or '1') positioned at / over the dead center of the Station). Radius physic being '1/2'. The Cosmological Constant is Base '2' primordial (primal) base (('0') and/or ('1')) constant.

A blackhole that looks and measures finite 'outside-in' may be quite the infinite Universe (U), quite the infinity of universes (u), 'inside-out'. Infinities of point-singularities wormholing to one and one only 'naked singularity'. Chao Theory points to stacked infinities of self-similar planes realized to reduce to '2', then '1'. History always repeats in the Big Picture (possibly to infinities), though rarely, if ever, in fine detail (again something like Pauli's exclusion principle applying).

The crunch at once bulges. One coin of two sides (two sides, two facets, two dimensions of a naked singularity of coin). The greater the crunch, the greater the bulge. An infinite 'Big Crunch' (BC (M)), an infinite 'Big Bulge' (BB (E)).

Universe (U):
Big Crunch (M) | Big Vacuum ((C) (C^2)) | Big Bulge (a. k. a. Big Bang) (E).
Space (M) | Space-Time ((C) (C^2)) | Time (E).
(C^2 = C . . . squaring.)

Big Mirror (Universe (U)), a. k. a. 'The looking Glass' and/or 'Gravity's Mirror', and/or 'Unity's Mirror', mirroring within ('outside-in') to infinities of island universes ('inside-out').

(M = E / C^2) | (C^2 = E / M) | (E = M x C^2)
((m = e / c^2) | (c^2 = e / m) | (e = m x c^2) (Just in case.))

The 'Irresistible Force' of the 'Immovable Object' (F = m x a).
--------------------------

It's a multi-faceted, multi-dimensional, Multiverse Universe.
 
Last edited:
Jul 24, 2020
24
7
1,515
All galaxies, light and all other matter exist in an infinite, eternal, flat,
homogeneous, isotropic, symmetric and cold cosmic vacuum.
In the 19th century "aether" was a theorized medium for propagation of light.
In the 20th c. "an absolute 4D spacetime" was a theorized medium for propagation of light.
In the 21th century " 4D spacetime" is still subject of debates
There isn't physics without real theory of "4D spacetime"
In classic Descates 3D, position, direction, duration and time have a specific meaning.
In an absolute 4D Minkowski space-time these parameters do not have concrete mieaning. Today, an absolute 4-dimensional space-time has no real physical definition.
 
Aug 14, 2020
713
126
2,060
All galaxies, light and all other matter exist in an infinite, eternal, flat,
homogeneous, isotropic, symmetric and cold cosmic vacuum.
In the 19th century "aether" was a theorized medium for propagation of light.
In the 20th c. "an absolute 4D spacetime" was a theorized medium for propagation of light.
In the 21th century " 4D spacetime" is still subject of debates
There isn't physics without real theory of "4D spacetime"
In classic Descates 3D, position, direction, duration and time have a specific meaning.
In an absolute 4D Minkowski space-time these parameters do not have concrete mieaning. Today, an absolute 4-dimensional space-time has no real physical definition.
The "flat", smooth, "homogenous", plane of Chaos Theory's "Sierpinski Carpet" isn't cold with just one exception to the rule. It's hot as hell. or at least as hot as the Planck horizon level Big Crunch (BC (M)) | Big Bulge / a. k. a. Big Bang (BB (E)) with just one exception to the rule. "Flat", smooth, "homogeneous", in no way describes the "Menger Sponge" lumpiness of cold with the sole exception of the 'Schrodinger's cat'-like superposition of "So hot it is as cold as the 'cold gates' of Hades" / "So cold it is as hot as the 'hot gates' of Hades." So super-hot, it is super-cold / So super-cold, it is super-hot: The point reached where there is no difference.
 
Last edited:

ASK THE COMMUNITY

Latest posts